[00:07] Good day and welcome back to Reality
[00:10] Check Q&A. That day of the week when you
[00:13] get to ask me, Ross Kulart, the hard
[00:16] questions. And here to be my blowtorrch
[00:19] interrogator, Megan Medic. Good day,
[00:21] Megan. How are you?
[00:22] >> I am good, Ross. We have had quite the
[00:24] busy week. How are you doing?
[00:26] >> It's been an extraordinary week. I
[00:28] noticed that just today, Eric Berles has
[00:31] revealed that Donald Trump is now going
[00:34] to be issuing a memo mandating the
[00:37] release of UAP files. This is great
[00:40] news. Very, very positive development
[00:42] and thank you to Eric Berles for all the
[00:45] work he's doing along with the rest of
[00:47] the UAP caucus in Congress.
[00:50] >> Well, we'll start with uh you know, more
[00:52] on Berles and Congress and what's going
[00:54] on over there. you are having quite some
[00:56] fun on X talking about this story. So,
[00:59] we'd love your reaction to it. A new
[01:01] church style committee investigation is
[01:03] definitely warranted into the CIA's and
[01:05] other agencies continued suppression of
[01:06] UAP data. It's time for the blowtorrch.
[01:10] What's going on here, Russ?
[01:12] >> I am very concerned, Megan, that the CIA
[01:15] has lost sight of where it sits in the
[01:19] intelligence community pyramid. It is
[01:23] subordinate to the office of the
[01:25] director of national intelligence Tulsi
[01:28] Gabbard. Tulsi occupies a very very
[01:31] important role in the US intelligence
[01:34] community. She's the US intelligence ZAR
[01:37] and her office was created in 2004 in
[01:41] legislation that was specifically
[01:43] designed to stop the catastrophes that
[01:47] happened that led to the 9/11 terrorists
[01:50] causing a disaster that killed thousands
[01:52] of Americans. So, a CIA spokeswoman
[01:56] today came out and criticized the fact
[02:00] that a person had given evidence who was
[02:03] a CIA official. He'd given evidence
[02:07] without checking first with the CIA.
[02:10] Apparently, the Congress is under some
[02:12] obligation to tell the Central
[02:14] Intelligence Agency that it intends to
[02:17] subpoena and question witnesses under
[02:20] oath before the Congress. This is an
[02:23] absurd notion and I couldn't believe the
[02:27] breathtaking hub who brristic arrogance
[02:29] of the spokeswoman for the CIA who
[02:33] called the proceedings dishonest
[02:35] political theater and actually accused a
[02:37] Senate committee of acting in bad faith
[02:40] by subpoenaing a CIA officer without
[02:43] notifying the CIA.
[02:46] The incredible thing about this is I've
[02:48] checked. There is no legal obligation
[02:51] for the Congress, for the Senate to
[02:53] notify the CIA about whether it intends
[02:56] to call a former or active CIA officer.
[03:01] Just in case the CIA has forgotten, the
[03:04] Congress is government of the people,
[03:06] for the people, by the people. The
[03:08] Congress has a constitutional right to
[03:12] oversight the CIA. And frankly, at the
[03:15] moment, the way the CIA is conducting
[03:17] itself, I do think it's time for a
[03:20] revisit that was muted, I think, by um a
[03:23] uh Senator Johnson from Wisconsin. He
[03:26] suggested that maybe it's time for a new
[03:29] church commission to investigate the
[03:31] illegalities and abuses of the CIA.
[03:34] Too many of the revelations about
[03:37] failure to heed UAE requirements for
[03:41] disclosure are going back to the CIA.
[03:45] Too much of the obstruction is coming
[03:47] from the CIA. John Ratcliffe, the
[03:51] director of the Central Intelligence
[03:52] Agency, made much when he was out of the
[03:56] CIA about being open and transparent
[03:59] about UAP files. Now that he's in that
[04:02] office, what's he doing to control and
[04:05] constrain the gatekeepers inside the CIA
[04:09] who are responsible for hindering access
[04:12] by the Congress to files? Now, there's a
[04:16] very important matter that's come up
[04:18] before the Congress just in the last few
[04:20] days. A gentleman uh by the name of
[04:24] James Erdman, he's a former ranger.
[04:27] Rangers lead the way. I've been in some
[04:29] sticky places with Rangers. They're
[04:31] they're good people. He served in the US
[04:34] Army's second battalion 75th Ranger
[04:37] Regiment. He's a state department
[04:39] foreign service officer in his time.
[04:42] He's received the DNI award, the CIA
[04:44] Medal of Merit, and he was detailed to
[04:47] the Office of the Director of National
[04:49] Intelligence under Tulsi Gabbard as PAC
[04:51] part of her director's initiatives group
[04:54] DIG from roughly March last year to
[04:58] April this year and he was reviewing
[05:01] intelligence community matters including
[05:04] the origins of CO. Now, at the moment, I
[05:08] guess he's left the DIG role. He's not
[05:11] strictly former CIA. He's been called a
[05:14] whistleblower. Some people dispute that,
[05:16] but let's not split hairs. He's somebody
[05:18] giving evidence in a way that the CIA
[05:21] clearly didn't like. And on the 13th of
[05:24] May, in testimony before the Senate
[05:26] Homeland Security and Governmental
[05:28] Affairs Committee, which was chaired by
[05:30] Senator Rand Paul, they were looking at
[05:33] the origins of the coid9 origins
[05:37] coverup. And Erdman stated that when the
[05:40] DIG ceased operations, the CIA took back
[05:44] 40 boxes of JFK files and MK Ultra files
[05:49] that were still in the process of being
[05:52] processed for declassification by the
[05:55] DNI, by DNI Gabbard. Now, he framed this
[05:59] as the CIA intervening to reclaim
[06:02] documents from the ODNI that were in the
[06:05] process of being declassified pursuant
[06:08] to President Trump's executive order,
[06:10] which demanded full declassification of
[06:14] all the remaining JFK assassination
[06:17] records with related efforts on MLK and
[06:20] RFK. Now, the implication was from this
[06:24] Erdman chap that the action circumvented
[06:27] oversight, that it was in some way
[06:29] blocking transparency or that it was in
[06:32] some way a withholding of records long
[06:35] sought by Congress. Now, we can't be
[06:38] clear at the moment because it's just
[06:39] not clear what was in those boxes
[06:41] because the CIA's taken them back. But I
[06:45] think Representative Anna Paulina Luna
[06:47] is completely within her rights to
[06:49] demand that the CIA returns them and
[06:52] accounts to the Office of the Director
[06:54] of National Intelligence about what was
[06:56] in those boxes and gives a reassurance
[06:59] that nothing in them has since been
[07:01] destroyed. I I frankly can't believe
[07:04] that the director of national
[07:06] intelligence office which has the legal
[07:09] authority the DNI is it's the head of
[07:12] the US intelligence community um
[07:15] essentially it's set up under the
[07:17] intelligence reform and terrorism
[07:19] prevention act of 2004. The CIA director
[07:23] reports directly to the DNI. It is
[07:27] subordinate to the DNI. The DNI is the
[07:30] principal intelligence advisor to the
[07:33] president, not the other way around.
[07:37] So the authorities that the ODNI have
[07:40] include full access to all national
[07:43] intelligence. All national intelligence.
[07:46] The CIA is not allowed to withhold
[07:48] anything from the director of national
[07:50] intelligence. They also have at DNI full
[07:54] oversight of the National Intelligence
[07:57] Program budget that fully funds the CIA.
[08:00] So if the CIA is constraining access by
[08:03] the Office of the Director of National
[08:05] Intelligence, by golly, they've better
[08:07] watch out. I have a sense that Tulsi
[08:09] Gabard is not going to put up with any
[08:12] nonsense. And neither from the Congress
[08:14] side is Representative Anna Paulina
[08:17] Luna. Now, the CIA does have practical
[08:22] and legal authority to manage and
[08:25] reclaim physical custody of its own
[08:28] records, even while they are being
[08:31] processed for declassification by the
[08:33] Office of the Director of National
[08:35] Intelligence. It doesn't have a
[08:38] unilateral power to override the
[08:41] director of national intelligence or a
[08:44] presidential executive order. And we're
[08:46] not saying that's what's happened here
[08:47] because we just don't know. So under
[08:50] Executive Order 13526, classified
[08:54] national security information and
[08:55] related regulations, the CIA retains
[08:59] primary control and declassification
[09:02] authority for information it originally
[09:04] classified. It can the ODNI can review
[09:09] and direct declassification after
[09:12] consult consultation with the CIA but
[09:16] the records themselves are typically
[09:19] loaned or referred to the director of
[09:21] national intelligence rather than
[09:23] permanently transferred. That doesn't
[09:25] mean that the CIA has the right to come
[09:28] in and just take those records away
[09:30] while the Director of National
[09:32] Intelligence Office is declassifying
[09:34] them. Because the reason this matters,
[09:37] we've been assured that all of the JFK
[09:40] records, the MLK records, and funnily
[09:43] enough, all the Epstein records have
[09:45] been released. And that's just not true.
[09:47] It's clearly not true from what we're
[09:49] being told today by this Erdman chap.
[09:52] and it's very important that he be
[09:54] supported. It's absolutely outrageous
[09:57] that the CIA feels it has the right and
[10:01] the contemptable arrogance to accuse the
[10:04] Congress of of indulging in political
[10:07] theater for calling somebody from the
[10:09] CIA without getting the CIA's permission
[10:12] first. Oh, dams. I'm sorry for you. The
[10:16] CIA is subordinate to the director of
[10:19] national intelligence. It's time it
[10:21] learned its ranking in the intelligence
[10:24] community pyramid. And there really is a
[10:27] question mark in my mind as to whether
[10:28] or not it's time 50 years on from the
[10:31] Church Committee inquiry to reassess the
[10:34] CIA and see whether it's time for them
[10:36] to be put under a rigorous blowtorrch
[10:39] investigation where allegations of
[10:42] crimes, including the alleged murder of
[10:44] people in the UAP community, are brought
[10:47] to public light. How much longer is the
[10:50] president and the congress going to put
[10:52] up with this nonsense from the
[10:55] CIA?
[10:57] Sorry, I've had my red. Thank you very
[10:59] much.
[11:00] >> All right, no problem. We will go into
[11:01] our inbox. This is from Antonio. Hi,
[11:04] Ross and Megan. Love your content on
[11:06] YouTube. Watch both your channels. The
[11:07] world needs more people like you. So,
[11:09] the recent declassification of a bunch
[11:11] of UAP files had me thinking. I'm seeing
[11:14] a bunch of the videos and photographs
[11:15] getting debunked online. Is this just a
[11:17] big scop from the US government whereby
[11:20] they release stuff? We internet sleuths
[11:22] debunk them all so they can just sit
[11:24] back and say, "See, we told you so.
[11:26] Nothing to see here." Then carry on
[11:28] hiding the truth for years. Am I being
[11:31] too cynical? I really like to feel
[11:33] hopeful, but I really don't trust the
[11:35] Pentagon to deliver the goods. Keep up
[11:36] the good work, Antonio.
[11:38] >> I think that's exactly what's going on.
[11:40] And I think the biggest indicator of
[11:41] this was when the former ARO, the
[11:43] Pentagon UAP investigations boss, Dr.
[11:46] Sha Kirkpatrick, whom I suspect is
[11:49] actually deeply involved in the legacy
[11:51] program, came out and displayed a
[11:54] contious, arrogant disregard for the
[11:57] forthcoming release, predicting that it
[11:59] would be a big fat nothing. It's almost
[12:01] as if he knew what was coming. Funny
[12:04] that. Yes, I do think that there is an
[12:06] extremely high likelihood that people in
[12:09] the Pentagon and the intelligence
[12:11] community deliberately dropped the
[12:13] lowhanging boring fruit in the in the
[12:16] feeling the sense that the public would
[12:18] go, "Oh, what a big yawn and go away." I
[12:21] think they've been taken aback that
[12:23] there have been literally hundreds of
[12:26] millions of views of what frankly at the
[12:30] moment is a fairly underwhelming drop in
[12:32] the first tranch of UAP files. Hopefully
[12:37] within the next week or so there will be
[12:39] a further tranch which reveals more. If
[12:43] they continue with what I think is scant
[12:46] disregard for the president's demand
[12:48] that there be full UAP disclosure, I can
[12:52] tell you there is a distinct change of
[12:55] mood inside the Congress. When you have
[12:58] representatives calling for church
[13:01] committee inquiries into the CIA, I
[13:04] don't think the CIA knows what it's
[13:06] doing. I really don't. I don't think
[13:07] they have any sense or understanding of
[13:10] the depth of public anger and contempt
[13:13] for arrogant intelligence agencies that
[13:16] believe that they can roll Russ over the
[13:19] public's right to know. Yes, there may
[13:21] be things that need to be classified in
[13:23] the protection of genuine national
[13:26] security concerns, but I do not think
[13:28] the CIA or any other intelligence agency
[13:31] should be making that decision. This
[13:34] takes us right back to what we've been
[13:36] talking about for months, which is the
[13:38] risk of catastrophic disclosure. There
[13:41] were key senators and congressmen who
[13:44] blocked the imposition, the creation of
[13:46] a presidential records review panel in
[13:49] the uh defense appropriations bill at
[13:52] the end of last year. If that
[13:55] presidential records review board had
[13:57] been instituted, you would have a
[13:59] ninemember panel of greybeards, people
[14:03] who were properly authorized and
[14:05] instructed in releasing national
[14:07] security information, who were able to
[14:10] operate independent of the intelligence
[14:12] community and make decisions about
[14:15] disclosure. Instead, because some, how
[14:19] does one say this politely? because some
[14:21] individual inside the Congress decided
[14:23] to stop the release of UAP presidential
[14:28] records review panel data in legislation
[14:30] that would have allowed this panel to
[14:32] operate. We are no longer able to use
[14:35] that system of declassification.
[14:37] This is blowback on the people that
[14:40] tried to stop the release of UAP data. I
[14:44] can only reiterate there is a very grave
[14:47] risk for the United States that if it
[14:50] doesn't move quickly to show good faith
[14:52] with the public on the release of UAP
[14:55] information, there is going to be a
[14:59] catastrophic disclosure. They don't know
[15:01] what's coming and they better watch out.
[15:04] A lot of good people are waiting to see
[15:06] what the US government is going to do.
[15:08] And it's very important and I think it's
[15:11] positive news that the president through
[15:13] Eric Burles who's revealed this just
[15:15] today. Representative Berles has
[15:17] revealed that the president will be
[15:19] releasing a memo very shortly. Sorry.
[15:22] Representative Bison has revealed that
[15:24] the president will be releasing a memo
[15:27] very shortly which will uh institute
[15:30] into law a mandated requirement that UAP
[15:34] disclosure occur. And if there's an
[15:37] attempt, a continuing attempt by people
[15:39] within the intelligence community, the
[15:41] defense department, and in the private
[15:44] military contractor community to try to
[15:46] gag this release, we're going to start
[15:48] naming and shaming them. And I think so
[15:50] also is the Congress. They truly had
[15:53] enough. There's a real change of mood
[15:56] right now. The public has smelt the
[15:58] blood in the water. Hundreds of millions
[16:01] of people have accessed the UFO site on
[16:05] the Department of War and they want real
[16:08] information. They are not going to be
[16:11] bullshitted anymore.
[16:14] >> Right. I've had to bleep you a couple
[16:15] times already today. So you're obviously
[16:17] doing really well. I love it.
[16:18] >> Do I have to be bleeded? What? Why do I
[16:20] have to get bleeped on YouTube? Is there
[16:21] something about
[16:22] >> I think we do I think it's I think
[16:24] it's that we we always bleep you on.
[16:26] >> What about
[16:28] I'm definitely I'm definitely believing
[16:30] that. Yeah.
[16:32] Um 100% I can guarantee you. Um I'm
[16:35] believing that. Anything else we should
[16:37] try before I
[16:38] >> No, no, no, no, no. I'll just think of
[16:40] suitable expletives that fall within the
[16:42] prescribed FCC definitions of acceptable
[16:44] language.
[16:46] >> Okay, perfect. I know that you love the
[16:47] rules. We'll go to X1959. Super lead
[16:50] wants to know, "Hi Megan, can Ross
[16:52] comment on Dr. Latsk's statement
[16:54] regarding the disinformation spread by
[16:56] some of the whistleblowers that gave
[16:58] testimony to Congress, particularly to
[17:00] OAP? Is disclosure being exploited and
[17:03] who would benefit?"
[17:05] Okay. So, James Latsky, Jim Latsky is a
[17:08] former DIA intelligence analyst, rocket
[17:12] scientist, and director at the time of
[17:14] the advanced aerospace weapons special
[17:17] systems applications program or ORAP.
[17:21] And there's been a long ding-dong going
[17:23] on between him and let's name and shame,
[17:26] Louondo, who has talked about his role
[17:29] at AIP, the Advanced Aerospace Threat
[17:32] Identification Program.
[17:34] And I have to admit I still don't quite
[17:37] understand why James Latsky is still
[17:40] doing this. And I I still also don't
[17:42] understand why Lou can't make a clear
[17:45] clarification about what ATIP's role was
[17:48] in relation to OSAP. I suspect there is
[17:52] a lot more there to be told, but
[17:54] essentially what Jim Latsky said in a
[17:56] weaponized episode with Jeremy Corbell
[17:59] and George Knap uh was uh I would say
[18:03] that no one I would hope that no one is
[18:06] lying to Congress. However, I know
[18:08] differently in these hearings. I know
[18:12] that people have lied. James Latsky
[18:15] said, "They said what they said and I
[18:18] can't go back and correct it even though
[18:20] I have proof that could correct it. I
[18:22] can't do that. It's too late." He's a
[18:25] terrible tease, Jim, because he doesn't
[18:27] actually say who he's talking about. And
[18:29] so that's left fuel on the fire. It's
[18:32] inflamed speculation on social media
[18:34] about just who he's talking about. But
[18:37] the the surrounding discussion and um
[18:40] community analysis tie this directly to
[18:43] alleged misrepresentations of
[18:45] conflations involving ORAP uh the
[18:48] official congressionally funded DIA
[18:51] program that um that Latsky proposed,
[18:55] designed and managed from 2008
[18:59] to 2010 versus the latter informally
[19:04] nicknamed continued effort. sometimes
[19:06] called ATIP. And I know Lou uh Lou
[19:10] Alzando has at times asserted that ATIP
[19:13] was associated with part of Osap and Jim
[19:17] Latsky has rejoined that that is not the
[19:20] case. And look, there is a bigger story
[19:23] here and I think it has a lot to do with
[19:24] Lou Alzando's true role as a counter
[19:27] intelligence official in the defense
[19:30] department. That's as far as I'm
[19:32] prepared to go. At some stage, Lou, I
[19:34] think, is going to have to give a
[19:36] clearer accounting of what his precise
[19:38] role was, both in the alleged ATIP
[19:42] program and possibly also in his
[19:44] knowledge of and involvement with the
[19:47] legacy program. I'll leave it at that.
[19:50] But I do think that for the UAP
[19:53] commentary community, this is very
[19:55] unhealthy. I think it's time the air was
[19:58] cleared. And I think as disclosure rolls
[20:01] out hopefully in the next few months, I
[20:04] do think it's going to become clearer
[20:05] about what the prescribed roles were of
[20:08] certain individuals and whether the um
[20:11] UAP community has been given the full
[20:14] story about people's roles. I think part
[20:18] of the issue here is national security
[20:20] constraints. I do think that there are
[20:22] people operating within UAP disclosure
[20:26] as advocates for disclosure and I do
[20:29] think they are very genuine. But I do
[20:32] think that a decision was made right
[20:34] back at the time of the 2016 Clinton
[20:38] Trump election campaign for the
[20:40] presidency that there was going to be a
[20:42] faction within the defense department in
[20:44] the intelligence community that tried to
[20:47] preempt what they thought was the
[20:48] likelihood that Clinton was going to
[20:50] become president. And in the expectation
[20:53] that Hillary Clinton was going to become
[20:55] president, there was the creation of the
[20:57] to the stars academy with various
[21:00] people. Jim Simovan, Lua Lzando, others
[21:04] being brought in as representatives or
[21:07] kind faces of disclosure. And I do think
[21:11] that was a laudable and genuine
[21:15] initiative, but I suspect it may also
[21:17] have been an initiative designed to try
[21:20] to control or constrain the narrative. I
[21:24] don't know. I'm only speculating. But at
[21:26] some stage there is going to have to be
[21:28] a clearer accounting because it's clear
[21:30] there is bad blood, let's be honest
[21:32] about it, between James Leky and Lu
[21:35] Lzando. And there is towards Lou from
[21:38] other people in the social media UAP
[21:41] commentary community, people who have
[21:43] served within government who obviously
[21:45] feel I think some resentment that things
[21:48] are not being properly represented. And
[21:50] I can kind of sympathize with Lou to
[21:52] some degree. I know exactly what Lou's
[21:54] role was and I know he hasn't been
[21:56] allowed to talk about it because for him
[21:58] to talk about it would be a breach of
[22:00] his national security oath because it
[22:02] would go to the heart of the existence
[22:04] of the legacy UAP retrieval and reverse
[22:07] engineering program. But I do think that
[22:10] in the interests of clarity and public
[22:12] full disclosure, it really is time that
[22:14] this silly tiff between James Latsky and
[22:17] Lou Alzando was resolved because all
[22:20] it's doing is sending a message to the
[22:21] debunkers that they can have some fun
[22:23] with the discord and um uh en enmity
[22:27] between different groups and factions
[22:29] inside this community.
[22:31] >> All right, we have a exp post from
[22:33] Adrian. Good day. Say that in your best
[22:36] Aussie accent, Megan. Um, okay. Uh, good
[22:39] day, Ross. Interested to hear your
[22:41] thoughts on the theory of a galactic
[22:43] federation that is essentially a
[22:45] coalition of advanced species that
[22:47] monitor and protect the galaxy and even
[22:49] interact with key figures on Earth.
[22:51] Wacky, yes. But,
[22:54] >> okay, the Galactic Federation. I have no
[22:57] idea whether there is such a thing.
[22:59] Obviously, if there is NHI and if there
[23:02] are NHI engaging benevolently or
[23:05] malevolently towards humanity, one might
[23:08] assume that there is a community or a
[23:11] grouping thereof of NHI. I just don't
[23:14] know. Um, it all sounds very Star Treky
[23:17] and I think the first origins of the
[23:20] notion of a galactic federation go right
[23:22] back to the 1950s to the 1970s where
[23:26] people started channeling. People
[23:28] claimed that they were in psychic
[23:29] contact with what they called the Ashtar
[23:32] command. It was a me messages were
[23:35] coming in from an alleged commander of
[23:38] extraterrestrials called Ashtar. And
[23:41] this was channeled by people like George
[23:43] Vanassel and later others. And it
[23:46] described a vast galactic federation of
[23:48] light as a peacekeeping force opposing
[23:51] dark forces with millions of spaceships
[23:54] ready to assist and help humanity. Of
[23:57] course, that hasn't happened, and I
[23:58] think we're entitled to be deeply
[23:59] skeptical. In the 1990s, it became more
[24:02] of a new age idea, and Sheldon N's
[24:05] ground crew crew project heavily
[24:08] featured chneled communications from a
[24:10] photonbuilt
[24:12] galactic federation of planets claiming
[24:14] an impending mass landing. Um, there was
[24:18] claims also of a union of over 200,000
[24:21] star nations focused on ascension and
[24:23] defense against negative entities. It's
[24:25] all very happy and there's not a jot of
[24:28] bloody evidence for any of it. Where
[24:30] it's got interesting, I noticed Elena
[24:32] Denan, for example, a contemporary UAP
[24:35] commentator, is claiming direct contact
[24:38] with a galactic federation of worlds.
[24:41] And um media TV like Gia, ancient aliens
[24:44] have had a lot of fun with the idea of a
[24:46] galactic federation. I just haven't seen
[24:49] any hard evidence. Probably the most
[24:53] interesting claim is a claim made by a
[24:56] guy who I would dearly love to sit down
[24:59] in front of a camera and believe me I
[25:01] have tried Mr. Him is shed, the former
[25:04] head of Israel's space program. He's the
[25:08] former space security chief, former head
[25:11] of the defense ministry of Israel's
[25:12] space directorate for nearly 30 years
[25:15] and a threetime Israeli security award
[25:19] recipient. in a Hebrew language
[25:20] interview with the Yidiot Aharonaut
[25:23] newspaper in Jerusalem, which was later
[25:26] widely picked up by Western media across
[25:29] the world. He made some extraordinary
[25:32] claims about things that he said in his
[25:34] book called The Universe Beyond the
[25:37] Horizon. He claimed that the US and
[25:40] Israel had been in secret contact with
[25:43] extraterrestrials from a galactic
[25:46] federation for years. He said that
[25:50] agreements were signed allowing ETSs to
[25:52] conduct experiments on Earth in exchange
[25:55] for technological knowledge. He also
[25:58] claimed that there is a joint
[26:00] underground base on Mars with American
[26:02] astronauts ET representatives. This is
[26:06] really interesting stuff. This is coming
[26:07] from the former head of Israel's space
[26:10] program. Nobody is saying that he is
[26:12] mentally unwell. He also said that
[26:15] President Trump was aware and on the
[26:17] verge of public disclosure. And this is
[26:20] interesting because he said this about
[26:21] two years ago, but he was asked
[26:23] apparently Trump was asked by the
[26:25] Federation not to do so to avoid mass
[26:29] hysteria until humanity evolves and
[26:32] reaches a stage where we will understand
[26:35] what space and spaceships are.
[26:39] Now, he presented these claims as
[26:41] factual based on insider knowledge, but
[26:45] he offered no documents. There's no
[26:47] proof. There's no physical evidence.
[26:49] There's no corroboration. Other Israeli
[26:52] space officials, uh, including a guy
[26:54] called Isaac Ben Israel, who's in the
[26:57] space program,
[26:59] acknowledged that Israel takes the
[27:01] possibility of extraterrestrial life
[27:03] very seriously. But he did a massive
[27:05] sideswipe of urge and tried to avoid
[27:08] even talking about what it was that his
[27:10] former boss was talking about. He
[27:12] dismissed the specific Federation claims
[27:15] as quote going too far. So what do we
[27:19] know? There is no specific empirical
[27:23] documentary corroborative witness
[27:24] evidence to support the idea that there
[27:26] is such a thing as a galactic
[27:28] federation. All references trace back to
[27:31] either channelers making unsourced un
[27:34] unverified messages, anecdotal claims by
[27:37] people like shed. There's another
[27:40] official actually a former um Canadian
[27:43] official Paul Helier, the former
[27:45] Canadian Minister of Defense, no less or
[27:48] minister of national defense. and he
[27:50] gave several UFO related interviews
[27:53] where he referenced ET federations or
[27:56] councils where he claimed he'd been told
[27:59] about the existence of such a
[28:00] federation.
[28:02] It it's really sad actually Paul Helas
[28:04] since passed. He was a keen advocate for
[28:06] disclosure. Again, not somebody whose
[28:09] colleagues say was mentally ill or in
[28:11] any way given to any kind of mass
[28:13] delusion. He claimed to have spoken to
[28:16] American generals and to have been
[28:18] briefed about this stuff. But
[28:20] essentially, frankly, I think Haime's
[28:23] 2020 claims, that's how long ago it was,
[28:26] they are the highest profile on record
[28:30] official sounding statements. But
[28:32] believe me, efforts by myself and others
[28:35] to get anywhere near him shed to sit
[28:38] down with him to have a one-on-one have
[28:40] been frustrated by a very intense
[28:43] curtain of quite unusual security
[28:46] surrounding him, his family, his home,
[28:49] and any of his associates. If Haimeshed
[28:52] ever did want to talk about the Galactic
[28:55] Federation or indeed any of those such
[28:58] allegations, we would welcome him with
[29:00] open arms on reality check, wouldn't we,
[29:02] Megan? Unfortunately, there is no
[29:05] prospect of that at the moment.
[29:07] >> Yeah, I've also reached out as well and
[29:09] um has not happened, but we're very
[29:11] interested in it.
[29:13] >> Absolutely. No, I'd love to see I'd love
[29:15] to do an interview with him. one of the
[29:17] things we get questions about a lot and
[29:19] uh frankly uh sadly it would appear that
[29:23] there are people inside inside the
[29:24] Israeli government that don't want Mr.
[29:26] Ashed to talk.
[29:29] >> All right. Well, Ross, that is all the
[29:30] time we have for today. Thank you so
[29:32] much.
[29:33] >> Okay. And thank you very much. And of
[29:34] course, if you do want to send us your
[29:36] questions, we can't guarantee we'll
[29:38] always have the time to answer them, but
[29:39] we'll give them a good hard go. The
[29:42] email is reality check@newsnation
[29:45] now.com. And please don't forget, as
[29:48] well as watching reality check here on
[29:50] YouTube, you can also listen to us now
[29:53] on Audible and Spotify. So, too much
[29:56] reality check of course is barely
[29:58] enough. Thank you very much, Megan.
[30:01] >> Thanks, Ross.
[30:04] >> Hey everybody, Megan Medic here from
[30:05] Unreported and Reality Check. And this
[30:08] week we have an incredible guest for you
[30:10] coming up on the show. This is a man
[30:12] named David Russell and he is a lifelong
[30:15] experiencer and professional musician
[30:18] and he has been followed around by the
[30:20] phenomena his entire life since he was
[30:23] in the single digits numbers age- wise
[30:26] and it's still happening to this day. He
[30:28] tells me all about how he feels
[30:30] sometimes that he can summon them or
[30:32] they're trying to communicate with him
[30:34] and that he's actually experienced this
[30:36] with other people around including
[30:38] people who you know Chris Bledsoe and he
[30:40] has a lot to say about what David has
[30:43] been experiencing his entire life and I
[30:45] find this really interesting because
[30:46] David is a man of faith and he did ask
[30:50] this being once are you from Jesus and
[30:55] it gave a response. David has all the
[30:58] videos to show and document his
[31:00] experiences and I can't wait for you
[31:02] guys to see those and hear his stories
[31:04] because it is truly very unique and I
[31:07] think that you'll all be enlightened by
[31:08] the end of the conversation. So, we will
[31:10] see you this week on Unreported with
[31:12] special guest David Russell.