This is a knowledge base on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) — what military and elected officials have actually said and done, separated from unverified claims. Sources include government documents, Congressional testimony, inspector general reports, and credible journalism. The credibility framework is explicit and applied case-by-case.
See Conventions & Methodology for how this base is built and how credibility is rated, or browse:
- Credibility assessment — tiered ratings of UAP figures with reasoning
- The 2017 watershed — how the modern UAP discourse began
- Congressional action — 1960-2026 disclosure-attempt timeline
- The contactee tradition — single-witness / hypnotic-regression claims and why they don’t carry evidentiary weight
- The interdimensional hypothesis — the main non-ET framework (Vallée → Hynek → Mack) and why it can’t be falsified
- Human involvement in abductions — the MILAB / human-staged-abduction hypotheses (Lammer, Greer, Blitch) and why they’re as unfalsifiable as what they critique
- Government UFO disinformation — the one documented case (Bennewitz/Doty/Moore) and how its manufactured lore still circulates as evidence today
- The December 2024 East Coast drone flap — the six-week multi-state event
- Cosmological claims — Ashtar Command → Eshed → Hellyer → Coulthart navigation
Or browse sources by kind: people · cases · reports · programs · legislation · events · documents · media · organizations.
By the numbers
- 98 people assessed with explicit credibility ratings
- 149 source-of-record pages · 28 topic analyses · 22 documented cases
- 713 primary documents captured, including 162 interview transcripts
- 921 pages · 5,749 internal cross-links · 5,120,302 words
This site is generated from a local knowledge base maintained in markdown. All content is sourced — see linked raw articles and transcripts for primary documents.