UFOpedia

reddit-borland-rubiks-cube-thread

7 min read

Reddit r/UFOs: Borland Rubik’s Cube reaction thread

Post text

Edit: not in A SCIF. Mistake by the audio transcriber, and me for seeing it and instantly forgetting it

Posted on X:

> Corbell: “Have you ever testified to ICIG about a UAP programme containing UAP called Project Rubik’s Cube?”

> Dylan Borland: “Let me collect my thoughts…”

> Audience member 1: “No”

> Audience member 2: “Dont do it”

> Dylan Borland: “I am not in a SCIF. I am not going to jail. I can neither confirm nor deny but if you want me to answer that question, ask for amnesty for the whistleblowers, as Congress and the Executive Branch should give it to us, and I’ll answer that question”

Top comments

[1] u/Medium_Raspberry8428: What’s the significance of this project?

[1] u/mantid_overlord: I don’t know the context of this video but why wouldn’t this be discussed/planned ahead of time?

This seems staged to me.

[1] u/DacStreetsDacAlright: Ok, so we now know something was called Project Rubik’s Cube. How is that going to help anyone? Also apparrently Project Rubik’s Cube has been publically searched on Google since 2016.

[1] u/DavidM47: It seems a little “performative,” no?

[1] u/Cyberkeys1: “I know what it is, but I can’t tell you…”
They’re going to play this game until the last sucker gets bored and won’t pay for attending lectures, books, or documentaries. What a con!

[1] u/AbeFromanEast: That’s shitty of Corbell to put him on the spot like that. There’s 3 people on that stage and only one of them will go to jail for disclosing classified information in public.

Other whistleblowers will see that and think: “nope, not me.”

[1] u/Ok_Nefariousness9019: This is all so fake and performative. I don’t trust any of this. Whether it’s psyop, or just them trying to sell whatever it is they sell… bs.

[1] u/asturkieelec: Look at Knapp’s face the whole time too. He’s like damn man what are you doing right now???

[1] u/Competitive-Cycle-38: Ffs someone just come out and risk their lives already for humanity God.

[1] u/Klavnir: I just watched him on Area 52 and he was soo insufferable to watch on there.

[1] u/Rohit_BFire: So some foia folks should foia for it I guess

[1] u/not_blmpkingiver: Bros are fist bumping each other like “yes they actually fell for it!”

[1] u/wallapuctus: Idk how to feel about this. We all complain “if he knows just say it!” So Corbell says it, and you can see Borland literally face palm and Knapp try to not lose his composure.

Jeremy wasn’t supposed to say that, it seems.

[1] u/Shardaxx: Jeremy likes to push and get these project names out there, it seemed mean but the fist bump at the end makes me think Borland was fine with it.

Sooooo what’s Project Rubik’s Cube aye precious? What’s Project Rubik’s Cube?

[1] u/arveus: If this doesnt convince you Corbell is not in this for the right reasons I dont know what to tell you

[1] u/BooRadleysFriend: Where have I heard this Rubiks cube thing before? There was some thing on Reddit about either-It was a remote viewer or something like that and an alien allegedly told him about this Rubik’s cube math to get from one place to another in an instant. Does anyone else recall this?

[1] u/Jesters_thorny_crown: Made for TV bullshit. Super low energy.

[1] u/UncleOdious: I was recently listening to an episode of Area 52 w Jeremy Corbell. That dude talks A LOT and says nothing at all. Talks in circles. Very annoying.

[1] u/13Eazy: its so dumb. these folks can say anything and and imply a lot but but won’t actually tell you anything definitive. thats not how security clearance and ndas work.

thats how you know they’re lying. even insinuations are breaches. the ufologists making these claims are doing so because they know the people who actually do know something about the phenomenon, are actually bound by protocol and law not to even bridge the topic let alone correct the record.

a breach doesn’t require revealing specific secrets. Even insinuating the existence of classified programs or hinting at sensitive knowledge can constitute a violation. in compartmentalized intelligence work (such as access to a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF)) personnel are prohibited from publicly acknowledging the program’s existence, let alone discussing it indirectly.

the notion that “insiders” wouldn’t speak definitively but might insinuate or imply knowledge misunderstands how secrecy protocols work. in high-clearance environments, even vague allusions to classified work are considered breaches. professionals trained in operational security (OPSEC) are taught to avoid creating suspicion or drawing attention to their roles.

someone who says, “i can’t talk about it, but trust me, it’s big,” is not demonstrating authenticity, they are violating the principle of need-to-know and potentially exposing themselves to investigation so claiming that they can’t disclose information because of protocols and some program is already a violation and a contradiction.

[1] u/TheBookOfLAM: Man I just made a post about liking this dude and the. He goes and puts Dylan on the spot

[1] u/nanaimohhh: Great event last night in McMinnville. Dylan was definitely nervous in his seat, far beyond just being in front a big crowd. I was sitting in the front row and could almost see him sweating. He was very careful with his words.

[1] u/FullOf_Bad_Ideas: Are you guys hearing audience members saying “No”, “Don’t do it” in this video. I don’t.

edit: now I do

[1] u/Omacrontron: Good thing he didn’t overreact otherwise I might think he knows a lot about something lol.

[1] u/Logical-Breakfast150: Has anyone actually gone to jail for this stuff?

[1] u/The_Seattle_Police: These people are literally playing pretend the same way little kids do.

[1] u/guacsockz: I will give my opinion on this, as a competitive solver of cubes. I have the standard “Rubik’s Cube”, as well as the more legit ones (like the GAN, it’s a Chinese company with amazing cubes).

In solving the cube, the algorithm matters. Essentially, it’s ALL THAT MATTERS. You can give me a cube that’s been scrambled for hours, and so long as the algorithm is known, it’s solvable, and fast. However, the part that nobody talks about in teaching how to solve a cube is that you first have to recognize WHERE in the process you are. A basic step by step process would be, for example, to solve the white cross, then white corners. Turn the solved white side face-down, and then solve the middle section. Solve the yellow cross on top, and once that’s done, you solve the top corners. If done correctly, the cube is done, regardless of how the colors were orientated when you got it.

In theory, not hard, but I look at the cube more philosophically than mathematically, and I believe that consciousness and the UAP/NHI phenomena works the same way, in the human mind’s view.

With a name like that, I would assume that there is a very specific, delicate process for accessing that “doorway” to these dimensions from where these things possibly come from. Distance and time are irrelevant once you start applying algorithms that make them as manipulatable as 3-D matter. The project they’re discussing, in my very modest opinion, would come down to recognizing steps that have already been taken for gaining access, and applying the “next level algorithm”, until the process is solved, aka opening whatever “metaphysical doorway” that allows access to these things via an assumptive 2-way portal or access point.

Just my thoughts as a cube solver.

[1] u/EducationalBrick2831: I don’t understand WHY, that Newscaster from Nevada is always backing up Corbell ! The more I hear Corbell the more I put him in the same category with the DoD guy who’s for sure full of false information !

Graph View

Backlinks