UAP Gerb — “Special Access Required: the Secrecy of UFO Crash Retrieval Programs” [VOL.2]
Source file: gerb-special-access-required-vol2.mp4. Duration: 3:22:45.
Transcribed: 2026-06-22 via Antigravity CLI (agy, model “Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)”) on 600s video chunks (320px/1fps); timestamps continuous across chunks.
Speech + speaker labels + on-screen visuals are machine-generated from the video; proper nouns and names may be mis-rendered — verify specific citations against the source.
[Visual, 0:00] Black screen, then David Grusch on a video call. [David Grusch, 0:01] The cognizance of who was kind of leading the program changed over time epochs. And the genesis was was in the Truman and Eisenhower National Security Council and and the CIA Office of Policy Strategy. [Visual, 0:05] Historical footage of President Truman. [Visual, 0:07] Historical footage of General Eisenhower. [Visual, 0:09] Central Intelligence Agency seals. [Interviewer, 0:09] Right. [David Grusch, 0:10] But, you know, the Atomic Energy Commission was involved, the Department of Defense at the time. [Visual, 0:12] Cartoon animation of a figure with an atom head reading books. [David Grusch, 0:17] With how they hide this program based on time epochs and who they trust - career civil servants, career senior executives in industry, they rotate it and it’s there’s no they randomize the schema too. [Visual, 0:23] Graphic of a black triangular craft rotating in a cloud vortex. [David Grusch, 0:27] It’s not like there’s one guy in this one DoD office always gets it. They spread it across and it’s it’s like rule by committee, flat hierarchy… [Visual, 0:29] Doug Wolfe, CIA CIO, speaking at a conference. [Visual, 0:32] National Reconnaissance Office logo over Earth. [Visual, 0:34] Central Intelligence Agency seal. [Visual, 0:36] National Security Agency seal. [Visual, 0:37] Department of Energy text overlay. [Visual, 0:38] Document reading “SECRET - TO BE SHOWN TO AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY”. [David Grusch, 0:40] What we’ve seen in previous administrations, like Clinton people the program thought Clinton was going to disclose in the 90s. [Visual, 0:41] President Bill Clinton speaking at a podium. [Visual, 0:46] Shredded paper in a burn bag. [David Grusch, 0:46] Well, there was a burn bag and shred party, um, at a particular agency in the mid 90s I’m aware of. [Visual, 0:48] CIA headquarters building. [David Grusch, 0:52] You have to remember, so, here’s one of the loopholes they use, right? So, there’s there’s White House Special Access Programs. [Visual, 0:54] White House press briefing room logo. [David Grusch, 0:58] Uh, there are something called covert access programs, 50 U.S. Code 3093. Those are the programs reported the Gang of Eight, Gang of Four. You know, that’s like assassinations stuff, etc. You know, other things the government doesn’t acknowledge. [Visual, 1:02] US Capitol building dome at night. [Visual, 1:05] President John F. Kennedy speaking at a podium. [Visual, 1:10] Representative Robert Garcia and David Grusch testifying at a hearing. [David Grusch, 1:10] But there’s a, you know, a way to develop a White House SAP that is non-covert action, you know, White House Special Access Program. If you look in the law, there are no reporting carve-outs. [Visual, 1:16] Seal of the President of the United States. [Visual, 1:23] Schematic diagram of a black triangular craft. [David Grusch, 1:23] Uh, that was one of the tricks of the trade, burying it over in the Department of Energy, but also keeping it in these non-covert action programs that like, you know, five people on the NSC know about, and the President at one time, and then, you know, it has custodianship over across the Potomac in McLean. [Visual, 1:25] Department of Energy seal and text. [Visual, 1:30] National Security Council document folder with “NSC 5412/2” label. [Visual, 1:32] Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon walking. [Visual, 1:34] Schematic diagram of a bell-shaped craft. [Visual, 1:36] Sign reading “CIA Operations Center”. [Visual, 1:38] Document reading “SECRET - TO BE SHOWN TO AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY”. [Visual, 1:41] Title graphic “UFO LEGACY PROGRAM”. [Narrator, 1:41] The singular purpose of my channel is to uncover the UFO legacy program architecture. Special access, unacknowledged special access, controlled access, and non-covert action White House programs that are housed within elements of the United States executive branch, armed forces, intelligence community, national laboratories, and defense industrial base infrastructure that is tasked with the retrieval, collection, storage, exploitation, and derivation of non-human technical vehicles and technologies of unknown origin. [Visual, 1:46] Aerial view of the Pentagon with text listing UFO legacy program security tiers. [Visual, 2:00] Sandia Laboratory logo featuring a mushroom cloud. [Visual, 2:02] Map of North America with text “MAJOR RANGE AND TEST FACILITY BASE” and agency seals. [Visual, 2:07] Disc-shaped craft inside a hangar. [Visual, 2:11] 3D model animation of a dome-shaped flying saucer next to a silhouette of a person. [Visual, 2:16] Soldiers in gas masks inspecting a crashed disc-shaped UFO. [Narrator, 2:16] This once mighty and stalwart national effort that I call the Manhattan Project 2.0, spearheaded by the U.S.’s greatest presidents, military leaders, senior statesmen, and seasoned politicians under the auspice of the National Security Council, devolved and degraded during the Cold War, breaking off pieces of itself and siloing itself into cover offices and programs to morph and adapt to special access program oversight reforms and expansions during the 1970s and 1980s, ultimately relegating program control to a quasi-government and industry control group of just over two dozen in 1994, in order to flee from the disclosure disposition of President Bill Clinton. [Visual, 2:20] Title text overlay “MANHATTAN PROJECT 2.0” over a crashed UFO. [Visual, 2:22] President Eisenhower shaking hands with associates. [Visual, 2:32] President Ronald Reagan speaking at a podium. [Visual, 2:36] Animation of a triangular craft in a lab with blue energy rays. [Visual, 2:50] Flashlight illuminating a crashed disc-shaped UFO at night with a person in a hazmat suit. [Visual, 2:55] Silhouette diagram showing Quasi USG/Industry Control Group, 1994. [Visual, 2:59] President Bill Clinton speaking in an office. [Visual, 3:04] American flag waving. [Narrator, 3:04] Further disfiguring was done to this once mighty effort when in the early days of the Global War on Terror, 2005 to be specific, certain defense contractors, like Northrop Grumman, harnessed company-funded independent research and development funds, IRAD, to ostensibly conduct their own breakaway UFO retrieval and exploitation activities, as well as 2009, when the last quote-unquote “mob boss” who reigned control of the entire legacy program portfolio across the scattered silos and grains of rice in a rice bowl, Dick Cheney, left office as VP. [Visual, 3:05] President George W. Bush stepping out of Marine One. [Visual, 3:10] Video footage of a street in Iraq from a military vehicle, text overlay “2005”. [Visual, 3:13] Manta-ray stealth drone underwater. [Visual, 3:14] Northrop Grumman logo. [Visual, 3:15] Sheets of US $100 bills on a printing press with “IRAD” text overlay. [Visual, 3:26] Dick Cheney standing in front of an American flag. [Visual, 3:39] Dick Cheney speaking in a news interview. [Visual, 3:43] Disc-shaped craft inside a hangar with a yellow crane. [Narrator, 3:43] Indeed, the immense UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering activities of Truman, Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, etc., are unrecognizable to the fractured ecosystem of today, a long past its prime portfolio of siloed program fiefdoms, subject to severe redundancies and brain drain, seriously at risk of losing a sub-rosa Cold War with our peer adversaries to harness control over these quote-unquote “otherworldly” technologies. [Visual, 3:48] President Eisenhower taking the oath of office. [Visual, 4:18] Chart showing National Security Council and associated aerospace contractors. [Narrator, 4:19] To visualize such a tangled and scattered web of programs that have seen nearly 80 years of morphing and mangling, I visualize the modern-day UFO legacy program structure as a pyramid, where further down the pyramid one travels, sees far less access to program institutional knowledge and exponentially decreasing ability to peer across program silos. [Visual, 4:29] Glowing green pyramid outline. [Visual, 4:44] Podcast host Jesse Michels speaking. [Narrator, 4:44] To keep a hyper-complex story short that I discuss in the introduction of nearly every single one of my videos, this pyramid was once governed by a now amorphous, centralized control group: Truman, Eisenhower, the National Security Council and its 5412 Committee Special Group, and that Special Group’s Maj 12 or Majestic 12, ultimately degrading into the quasi-industry and government control group of today, that features a flat hierarchy where nobody after Dick Cheney operates full control and oversight of all siloed program directives. [Visual, 4:46] Pyramid diagram of UFO Legacy Programs detailing its structure. [Visual, 5:02] NSC to NSC 5412 “Special Group” and MAJ12 flow chart. [Visual, 5:10] Diagram of Quasi USG/Industry Control Group 1994 overlaying President Clinton. [Visual, 5:15] Close-up of Dick Cheney. [Narrator, 5:23] Below the control group sits program administration, best thought of by me as silo containers housing specific programs and directives under specific elements of the armed forces and intelligence community. [Visual, 5:23] Glowing pyramid diagram highlighting the DOD/IC ADMIN tier. [Visual, 5:27] Agricultural silos. [Narrator, 5:38] Below the administrators sits Federally Funded Research and Development Centers, FFRDCs, and GOCOs, Government Owned Contractor Operated institutions. [Visual, 5:38] Pyramid diagram highlighting the FFRDC tier. [Visual, 5:45] Text overlay “COCO: GOVERNMENT OWNED CONTRACTOR OPERATED”. [Visual, 5:49] Whiteboard animation explaining FFRDC structure. [Narrator, 5:49] FFRDC and GOCO structures allow the US government to attract the brightest of industry and subject matter experts while still retaining strict control over programs, materials, breakthroughs, etc. [Narrator, 6:04] At the bottom layer of the pyramid sits the most security vulnerable aspect of the legacy structure: defense industrial base prime contractors and their subcontractors. [Visual, 6:04] Pyramid diagram highlighting the DIB Prime Contractors and Infrastructure tiers. [Visual, 6:11] Opening red doors of a secure facility. [Narrator, 6:16] Only specific personnel within these companies are read into the legacy effort at a functional level, including executive level positions, C-suite execs, or special program directors. [Visual, 6:22] Modern concrete underground hangar entrance with light glowing from it. [Visual, 6:23] Checklist of executive positions read into the program. [Visual, 6:29] Computer screen showing green programming code. [Narrator, 6:29] The mortar that binds this structure together, well, of course, this is the U.S. defense industrial base, whose authoritative channels are often bypassed to allow UFO legacy programs to harness any U.S. military and intelligence asset that may be needed to accomplish these covert mission directives. [Visual, 6:37] Interactive map of North America showing facility details. [Visual, 6:42] Map showing base locations, seals, and text “MAJOR RANGE AND TEST FACILITY BASE”. [Narrator, 6:51] But one aspect of this pyramid has not degraded and broken itself over time. Instead, this core element to the legacy pyramid has, in a way, increased exponentially alongside the morphing of the legacy program structure. Indeed, I am speaking about the equivalent to the limestone casing that once encapsulated the Great Pyramids of Giza to protect the structures from the elements: the UFO legacy program security apparatus. [Visual, 6:52] Scientists in hazmat suits inspecting a disc-shaped UFO in a lab. [Visual, 7:11] Blue neon padlock in front of the Great Pyramid of Giza. [Visual, 7:20] Shield icon overlaying the pyramid diagram. [Narrator, 7:25] The security architecture of UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs is so incredibly robust, not only have I had to break this topic into two separate parts to cover the changing security blanket obfuscating UFO covert activities from 1947 to present, but I have also had to convey such a security apparatus analogous to an onion, where akin to an onion center surrounded by many layers, the core secrets and extant presence of the UFO crash retrieval and exploitation portfolio is always hidden and obscured by another layer of protection and secrecy. [Visual, 7:32] UAP Gerb narrator speaking directly to the camera in a room. [Visual, 7:36] Debris field from an explosion, text overlay “1947 - UFO LEGACY ACTIVITIES FORMALIZED”. [Visual, 7:38] Flying saucer hovering over hills, text overlay “2026 - MODERN LEGACY STRUCTURE”. [Visual, 7:43] Close-up of a red onion being sliced. [Visual, 7:49] Concentric white circle layers on a black background. [Narrator, 8:06] So today, I warmly welcome you to join me for part two of our investigation into UFO legacy program secrecy. After all, one of the most appropriate and poignant questions asked about the existence of UFO legacy programs, is how can such technology, biologics, crash retrievals, and programs be kept secret, and kept secret for 80 years at that? [Visual, 8:24] Question text overlay: “HOW COULD THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY KEEP SUCH AN EFFORT SECRET?” [Visual, 8:34] Barack Obama interviewed by Stephen Colbert. [Barack Obama, 8:34] Here’s the thing. [Stephen Colbert, 8:35] Uh-huh. [Barack Obama, 8:35] For those of you who still think that, you know, we’ve got little green men, uh, underground somewhere… [Stephen Colbert, 8:43] Yeah. [Barack Obama, 8:44] One of the things you learn as president is government is terrible at keeping secrets. This idea of conspiracy theories, if if there were aliens or alien spaceships or anything under the control of the United States government that we knew about, seen, photographed, what have you, I promise you, some guy guarding the installation would have taken a selfie with one of the aliens and sent it to his girlfriend to impress her. It would leak. [Stephen Colbert, 9:16] It would leak. [Visual, 9:17] UAP Gerb logo with keyhole. [Narrator, 9:17] Today’s project seeks to pick up right where we left off, correcting the record on similar obtuse comments like that from Obama. [Visual, 9:20] Metallic saucer craft, text overlay “MANHATTAN PROJECT 2.0, UFO LEGACY PROGRAM SECRECY, PART 2”. [Visual, 9:21] President Obama speaking at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. [Visual, 9:27] Historical photo of officials, text overlay “MJ-12”. [Narrator, 9:27] We will be leaving the epoch of 1947 to 1994, where we explored the Manhattan Project 2.0’s security apparatus ripped straight from the Manhattan Project, investigated key individuals instrumental to establishing covert UFO recovery and study infrastructure, distilled how statutory secrets derived from the 1954 Atomic Energy Act not only evade presidential declassification, but also serve as the perfect vessels to hide UFO activity. [Visual, 9:32] Mushroom cloud explosion, text overlay “MANHATTAN ONTO MANHATTAN 2.0”. [Visual, 9:33] Mushroom cloud with overlay list: “COMPARTMENTALIZATION, ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHITECTURE, PHYSICAL SECURITY, CLASSIFICATION & INFORMATION CONTROL, POLITICAL SHIELD/COVER”. [Visual, 9:47] Close-up of a human eye with an atom symbol pupil. [Visual, 9:53] Comparison diagram of “TRACK 1: EXECUTIVE ORDER BASED SYSTEM” vs “TRACK 2: STATUTORY AEC SYSTEM”. [Visual, 10:00] US Classification diagram comparing Track 1 (Executive Order Based System) and Track 2 (Statutory AEC System) [Narrator, 10:00] activities with an iron grid. [Visual, 10:02] Chart of the Organization for National Security [Narrator, 10:02] Identified the National Security Council as the top secret early legacy control group. [Visual, 10:08] Saucer graphic inside a vortex [Narrator, 10:08] Narrowed in on the great schism that led to the Manhattan Project 2.0 taking drastic security measures during the 1980s to maintain secrecy, leading directly to the fractured program ecosystem of today and so much more. [Visual, 10:10] Diagram showing Manhattan Project 2.0 transitioning to Modern Day Fractured Legacy Structure [Visual, 10:17] David Grusch testifying before a congressional committee [Visual, 10:21] A triangular UFO with glowing lights [Visual, 10:24] B&W footage of Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and other officials [Narrator, 10:24] As we depart the Manhattan Project 2.0, and quite frankly, its depressing devolution behind, we move on into the modern era to shift our lens on how UFO legacy activities today maintain secrecy. [Visual, 10:31] Lue Elizondo giving a thumbs-up next to text listing intelligence and defense organizations [Visual, 10:39] Hands slicing a red onion [Narrator, 10:39] We will reorient our lens to study layers of the UFO legacy onion, critical individual layers and concepts paramount to obfuscating the core of the 21st century legacy apparatus. [Visual, 10:44] Concentric red circles depicting the layers of the UFO legacy onion [Visual, 10:53] A pyramid diagram representing UFO Legacy Programs with a saucer in the background [Narrator, 10:53] After all here, a cadre of covert, compartmentalized, and beyond top secret programs, facilitating knowledge and need to know access to the greatest secret in the history of mankind, the presence and procurement of non-human technology and their biological operators, existing as a hidden shadow symbiotically attached to the United States government, armed forces, intelligence community, would require an ever evolving, impenetrable, and stalwart architecture to stay hidden from even presidents and other elected, quote-unquote, temporary employees, would it not? [Visual, 11:07] Hangar entrance in a desert with Joshua trees [Visual, 11:08] A saucer flying in a dark blue sky [Visual, 11:11] A saucer parked inside a hangar [Visual, 11:13] The US Capitol dome lit up at night [Visual, 11:17] Map showing Major Range and Test Facility Base locations [Visual, 11:19] Central Intelligence Agency floor seal [Visual, 11:21] Aerial view of the Pentagon with a red overlay [Visual, 11:26] Donald Trump speaking at a table [Visual, 11:34] Green analog static screen glitch [Visual, 11:35] Hands peeling a brown onion [Narrator, 11:35] So let’s peel back some layers of embedded secrecy, where layers protect layers that obscure core secrets. [Visual, 11:38] Knife cutting a white onion in half [Visual, 11:42] Washington D.C. skyline at dusk with text: “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP)” [Narrator, 11:42] From conceptualizing special access programs, or SAPs, [Visual, 11:46] A man in a blue suit speaking with text overlays: “MANAGED NEED-TO-KNOW (MNTK)” and “NON-COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” [Narrator, 11:46] to uncovering some of the loopholes for managed need-to-know compartmented programs legacy operations have used with, quote-unquote, non-covert White House programs, [Visual, 11:57] Two badges: “SECURE MISSION EXECUTION” and “ACCESS CONTROL SPECIALIST” [Narrator, 11:57] to program protection agencies, deputized to enforce insider and outsider threat protection to maintain total program secrecy, [Visual, 12:00] Badge of the Office of Special Projects [Visual, 12:03] Badge of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center [Visual, 12:07] Witnesses swearing in at a congressional hearing [Narrator, 12:07] to the antibodies David Grusch awoke when investigating the topic in a legal and empowered manner, [Visual, 12:13] Sean Kirkpatrick speaking with AARO logo [Narrator, 12:13] to the disgraced Sean Kirkpatrick and his ineffective All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, AARO, [Visual, 12:20] Title slide: “ADVANCED AEROSPACE THREAT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM” [Narrator, 12:20] to the AATIP program protection management campaign and attempts to talk about the subject outside of the proverbial onion, [Visual, 12:24] Lue Elizondo sitting in an office [Visual, 12:28] Doug Wolfe speaking at Strata + Hadoop World conference [Narrator, 12:28] to the myriad, and I mean myriad, criminal actions taken that aid the all-encompassing subject of, quote-unquote, unrivaled secrecy. [Visual, 12:32] External view of the CIA headquarters [Visual, 12:34] CIA seal on wall with text: “UNRIVALED SECRECY” [Visual, 12:38] A podcaster speaking into a microphone with concentric rings overlay [Narrator, 12:38] This project will not hold back, and aims to conduct a hyper-specific investigation into the modern-day legacy onion. [Visual, 12:46] Glitch animation of white circles [Visual, 12:47] US Capitol dome at night with text: “TS//SAR-LEGACY//WAIVED” [Narrator, 12:47] So, as I said in part one, sit back, mark your notes, special access required, and let us deep dive into the secrecy and security mechanisms that embolden UFO legacy programs to operate in the shadows with unrivaled secrecy, power, and reach. [Visual, 12:54] A black triangular craft hovering in the sky [Visual, 13:01] A dark hallway with closed doors [Visual, 13:03] Overhead shot of the Pentagon [Visual, 13:08] A city/airport at night, transitioning to text: “UAP GERB” [Visual, 13:12] Crashed saucer in a rocky desert with text: “SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED” [Visual, 13:15] A car driving at night with title: “SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED - PART 2” [Visual, 13:20] CIA floor seal with text: “SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED - PART 2” [Visual, 13:24] Black screen [Visual, 13:25] Sliced red onions with text: “THE ONION REVISITED” [Visual, 13:31] A hand pressing rewind on a cassette deck [Narrator, 13:31] Before jumping off into our investigation today, let us quickly define our onion analogy, recap part one of our investigation, and lay out today’s discussion points in an executive summary format. [Visual, 13:34] Knife cutting an onion [Visual, 13:37] Host speaking directly to camera [Visual, 13:39] Checklist of discussion points over a saucer graphic [Visual, 13:44] B&W footage of Harry S. Truman reading from a paper [Narrator, 13:44] Part one focused predominantly on the rise of the Manhattan Project 2.0 security infrastructure, and fall from grace during the Cold War into the fragmented and siloed program infrastructure of today. [Visual, 13:51] Ronald Reagan speaking at a podium [Visual, 13:53] A triangular craft rotating in a grey vortex [Visual, 13:57] Black screen [Visual, 13:58] Hazmat suit personnel investigating a crashed saucer, helicopter overhead [Narrator, 13:58] Within the Manhattan Project 2.0 volume, we listened closely to the sage words of David Grush, who directly stated the Manhattan project secrecy apparatus was translated directly onto early UFO retrieval and exploitation efforts. [Visual, 14:04] B&W footage of J. Robert Oppenheimer speaking [Visual, 14:08] Person in a hazmat suit with a flashlight next to a saucer at night [Visual, 14:14] David Grush speaking during a podcast interview [David Grusch, 14:14] First of it obviously it’s understanding the situation, right? What do we have our hands on? And, and like I’ve said in some other videos and stuff, you know, they took the Manhattan Project secrecy and overlaid it on this issue because that secrecy worked well for atomic bomb developments and whatnots. And, and certainly, this whole program in a nutshell, if I were to like summarize the 90 plus years of history, it is a reverse engineering program to garner some kind of insight [Visual, 14:45] Two men in a library looking at a book with text: “MANHATTAN PROJECT 2.0” [Narrator, 14:45] Indeed, we then explored five critical concepts of secrecy, translated from the Manhattan Project directly onto the Manhattan Project 2.0. [Visual, 14:54] Smoke background with a list of five secrecy concepts [Visual, 15:05] Close-up of tape reels spinning [Narrator, 15:05] To summarize an hour plus section in just a few sentences, let’s quickly recap and break down each of these points. [Visual, 15:10] B&W footage of a military officer speaking into a microphone [Visual, 15:14] Glitch screen [Visual, 15:15] US Army Restricted Area Warning sign with text overlay: “COMPARTMENTALIZATION” [Narrator, 15:15] Compartmenting or compartmentalizing programs or information operates as a defensive security mechanism, reducing attack vectors for espionage, leaks, and intrusions. [Visual, 15:22] A soldier inspecting a white truck behind a chain-link fence [Visual, 15:25] Soldiers standing guard [Visual, 15:27] Document text: “What is Compartmentalization?” [Narrator, 15:27] The practice of compartmentalization sees program personnel granted access only to the specific information they need to perform their duties, even if they hold the necessary clearance level. [Visual, 15:40] B&W footage of men working in a control room [Narrator, 15:40] The Manhattan Project served as a period of tremendous innovation of compartmented programs, leading to the modern-day basis for special access programs. [Visual, 15:46] Person in a hazmat suit with text overlay: “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS” [Visual, 15:51] Animated cell dividing with text overlay: “ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHITECTURE” [Narrator, 15:51] We also discussed organizational architecture being weaponized and leveraged for secrecy. [Visual, 15:57] Map of Manhattan Project sites with a logo: “MANHATTAN PROJECT A-BOMB” [Narrator, 15:57] The Manhattan Project was conducted out of the Manhattan Engineer District, MED, which served as the legal and administrative entity through which the Manhattan Project operated. [Visual, 16:03] B&W footage of people lined up along a fence [Visual, 16:06] B&W footage of security checkpoint with search warning sign [Visual, 16:09] Website screenshot about Corps of Engineers organizational structure [Narrator, 16:09] The MED was chosen to be inconspicuous, and essentially a container within the US Army Corps of Engineers to house the top secret atomic project. [Visual, 16:15] Photos of MED buildings and orders with a castle logo [Visual, 16:19] B&W photo of soldiers with “SPECIAL ENGINEER DETACHMENT” sign [Visual, 16:21] Jet fighter at sunset with a saucer flying above and text overlay “UAP GERB” [Narrator, 16:20] We compared this secrecy practice with the early days of the, quote-unquote, hidden wing, an Air Force series of UFO test and evaluation programs I’ve published extensively on, that are housed as a shadow hidden in plain sight within the Department of the Air Force. [Visual, 16:25] Fighter jet pilot cockpit view [Visual, 16:31] Hangar interior with digital overlays [Visual, 16:33] Shield logo with “AD INEXPLORATA” and website address “AFTC.AF.MIL” [Visual, 16:37] People in yellow hazmat suits with text overlay: “PHYSICAL SECURITY” [Narrator, 16:37] Moving on to physical security, saw translation of the Manhattan Project’s most secret and heavily guarded sites, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, and soon to be Los Alamos C division at Sandia Base, aka Sandia National Lab, onto the Manhattan Project 2.0. [Visual, 16:40] Slicing open a cardboard package [Visual, 16:42] A padlock on a metal case showing “LANL” [Visual, 16:43] Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory and logo [Visual, 16:47] Glass plate with an abstract drawing [Visual, 16:48] Logo of Sandia Laboratory [Visual, 16:51] A green bird/thunderbird emblem [Visual, 16:53] Two soldiers wearing helmets and gas masks [Visual, 16:56] B&W footage of Harry S. Truman signing a document with officials [Narrator, 16:56] Indeed within that section, we discussed alleged classified executive orders signed by Truman in 1948, which relegated custody of recovered discs to Atomic Energy Commission national laboratories to be studied by the prestigious Dr. Vannevar Bush. [Visual, 17:03] Graphic title card: “GUARDIAN OF THE ATOM” [Visual, 17:07] Black screen [Visual, 17:08] Wall sign: “UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION” [Visual, 17:09] B&W footage of Dr. Vannevar Bush [Visual, 17:13] B&W footage of men working on a device on a tower scaffolding [Narrator, 17:13] And here we arrive to our final two Manhattan Project security blankets, that are crucial to conceptualize as we move on to part two today, classification and info control, political shield/cover. [Visual, 17:14] Text overlay: “CLASSIFICATION/INFO CONTROLS” and “POLITICAL SHIELD / COVER” [Visual, 17:22] B&W footage of three officers at a table with text overlay: “CLASSIFICATION/INFO CONTROL” [Narrator, 17:22] Classification and information control saw discussion of self-imposed and mandatory self-classification protocols for atomic scientists, as well as a deep investigation into the 1946 and 1954 Atomic Energy Acts. [Visual, 17:25] Close-up of a military officer [Visual, 17:26] Atomic model animation [Visual, 17:31] Line-art animation of an atom [Visual, 17:34] Text overlay: “1946 ATOMIC ENERGY ACT” and “1954 ATOMIC ENERGY ACT” [Visual, 17:38] B&W footage of Dwight D. Eisenhower signing a document, surrounded by officials [Narrator, 17:38] One of the most critical discussions of the entirety of part one was highlighting the introduction of two separate tracks of classification within the United States upon establishment of the Atomic Energy Commission. [Visual, 17:44] A vertical split screen diagram of Track 1 and Track 2 over the Pentagon [Visual, 17:53] High-angle aerial view of the Pentagon [Narrator, 17:53] Track one of course, being the standard executive order based system, think of the standard confidential, secret, and top secret levels of classification. Track two, being the statutory Atomic Energy Commission, DOE and NNSA system, whose authority is derived from the 1954 Atomic Energy Agreement. [Visual, 17:54] Diagram showing Track 1 “EXECUTIVE ORDER BASED SYSTEM” and Track 2 “STATUTORY AEC SYSTEM” [Visual, 18:03] Exterior view of the Department of Energy building [Visual, 18:15] US Capitol dome at night [Narrator, 18:15] The second track of US classification here, sees equivalence to secret and top secret classifications with L and Q clearance respectively, but also restricted data, formerly restricted data, special nuclear materials, all information, quote-unquote, born classified. [Visual, 18:18] Diagram showing clearances Q and L and their equivalents [Visual, 18:24] Abstract animation of glowing particles [Visual, 18:25] Article excerpt: “Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, and Transclassified Foreign Nuclear Information” [Visual, 18:28] Document page: “Chapter 5. Production of Special Nuclear Material” [Visual, 18:34] Cell dividing animation [Narrator, 18:34] Such a second system is not subject to executive order and will likely prove to be a real can of worms for any president to take full steps to disclose. [Visual, 18:37] Article page: “RESTRICTED DATA” [Visual, 18:45] David Grush speaking in the passenger seat of a moving car [Narrator, 18:45] Thanks to the sage counsel and discussion of Grush, we know both systems of classification are used by legacy programs to maintain secrecy. [Visual, 18:55] David Grush speaking during a podcast interview [David Grusch, 18:55] They’re basically treating this as nuclear secrets because it gives off, you know, nuclear radiation. Because if you look at the ultra-vague definition of special nuclear material, which is section 51, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, it says anything that gives off a sizable amount of atomic energy. Literally that’s what it says. Well, what’s sizable, and what legal gymnastics are you saying this stuff, which is obviously not a, well, who knows, maybe it is a nuclear weapon, and you’re saying this is a US nuclear secret, you’re transclassifying it into a nuclear secret. [Visual, 19:36] B&W footage of Harry S. Truman and other officials standing [Narrator, 19:36] Finally here, we have the political shield/cover, which existed as the, quote-unquote, top policy group at the apex of the Manhattan Project. [Visual, 19:37] Text overlay: “POLITICAL SHIELD / COVER” [Visual, 19:42] Text overlay: “TOP POLICY GROUP” [Visual, 19:46] Portraits of historical figures (FDR, Truman, Stimson, Marshall, Bush, Conant) [Narrator, 19:46] The top policy group was the narrow and strip chain of command to which General Leslie Groves reported, consisting of a handful of powerful figures like FDR/Truman, Army Chief of Staff General George C. Marshall, Vannevar Bush, James Conant, [Visual, 20:00] Diagram of Top Policy Group with historical photographs of government and military officials. [Narrator, 20:00] …Marshall, and Secretary of War Henry Stimson. And of course, don’t forget head of the OSRD, or Office of Scientific Research and Development, Vannevar Bush, and his assistant. [Visual, 20:04] A circular seal labeled “OSRD” appears over Vannevar Bush’s photo. [Visual, 20:10] A transition showing a sign that says “SECURITY”, followed by historical security footage. [Narrator, 20:11] And the purpose of this group, well, this was to keep read-in personnel and the existing control groups small, minimize a paper trail, and maintain presidential control. [Visual, 20:15] Black-and-white security footage of visitors entering a building. [Visual, 20:19] Close-up of a “PROTECTIVE FORCE USAEC” badge. [Visual, 20:20] Archival footage of President Harry S. Truman being sworn in. [Narrator, 20:21] Funny enough here, Truman wasn’t briefed on the Manhattan Project as a senator, or even vice president. Only when he was sworn in as president after FDR’s death, was he actually read in. [Visual, 20:27] A text document overlay titled “First Encounter with the Manhattan Project”. [Visual, 20:32] An organizational chart titled “ORGANIZATION FOR NATIONAL SECURITY”. [Narrator, 20:33] Indeed, we discussed how Truman relegated control over the UFO portfolio to the National Security Council after the establishment of the 1947 National Security Act. [Visual, 20:44] Archival footage of Dwight D. Eisenhower’s inauguration ceremony. [Narrator, 20:44] But of significantly greater consequence, we discussed how in 1954 and 1955, President Eisenhower created the NSC 5412 committee special group, and designated such a body focused on covert action as the Manhattan Project 2.0’s control group. This is the Majestic 12, appropriately called at this time, Maj 12. [Visual, 20:51] A document titled “Director of Central Intelligence” with a subject regarding registration of objects in space. [Visual, 21:03] The text “MAJ12” flashes on screen. [Visual, 21:10] Soviet military parade with the text “COLD WAR - CHANGING TIDES”. [Narrator, 21:10] Ultimately, within part one, we discussed the Cold War and the concept of changing tides, where the wild, wild west days of the legacy program ran from the 1950s up until the early 1980s. [Visual, 21:16] A steaming mug in a dark room with the text “MANHATTAN PROJECT 2.0 GOLDEN ERA” and a timeline. [Visual, 21:23] An outdoor concrete bunker with labels “EO 10502”, “EO 11652”, and “EO 12356” appearing. [Narrator, 21:23] This epoch saw several executive orders expand and contract oversight over special access program precursors, a.k.a. black projects. [Visual, 21:33] President Richard Nixon at a press conference, followed by the Federal Register cover of Executive Order 11652. [Narrator, 21:33] Indeed, Nixon’s executive order 11652 saw tremendous concern over ad-hoc security protocols, including top secret codeword access. [Visual, 21:36] An official report excerpt titled “Use of Access, Distribution, or Control Markings”. [Visual, 21:44] President Ronald Reagan speaking, followed by the Federal Register cover for Executive Order 12356. [Narrator, 21:44] We concluded the great schism that ended the Manhattan Project 2.0 was actually Ronald Reagan’s 1982 Executive Order 12356, which ended the wild, wild west days of legacy activities by effectively concluding top secret codeword read-on access and other ad-hoc security protocols, as well as the 1983 revelation of Yellow Fruit, an Army SOD, or Special Operations Division, unacknowledged special access program, USAP. [Visual, 21:54] A rider on a horse. [Visual, 21:56] Aerial view of the Pentagon with labels “TOP SECRET CODEWORD READ-ON ACCESS” and “AD HOC SECURITY PROTOCOLS” crossed out. [Visual, 22:03] The book “Secret Warriors” by Steven Emerson with pages shown, and the text “YELLOW FRUIT” appearing. [Visual, 22:13] Footage of military activities including soldiers loading equipment onto a helicopter. [Narrator, 22:13] This USAP, a term we will use often today, was discovered through a series of normal audits and revealed a shady world of data masking, cover offices, staged retirements, funding schemes, illegal covert activities, and so on. Yellow Fruit partially led to the uncovering of the Iran-Contras, and directly led to massive SAP reforms. [Visual, 22:27] Footage of Colonel Oliver North being swamped by press cameras. [Visual, 22:35] Close-up of an American flag sticker, followed by a television showing Edward Aldridge. [Narrator, 22:35] Such reforms forced legacy activities to sever off their own limbs to hide and silo themselves within cover offices and programs. [Visual, 22:45] A saucer-shaped craft sitting inside a hangar. [Narrator, 22:45] As a finishing bow on part one, we discussed how legacy operations, fearful of Clinton’s disclosure appetite, permanently vested the UFO legacy program control group in 1994 into a quasi-industry and government control group of just over two dozen. And again, it appears Dave Grusch agrees with this statement. [Visual, 22:49] President Bill Clinton speaking, followed by an evening view of the Capitol dome. [Visual, 22:56] Graphic labeled “QUASI USG/INDUSTRY CONTROL GROUP 1994” with person icons and a saucer UFO. [Visual, 23:01] Archival footage of a congressional hearing with Mr. Graves and Mr. Grusch nameplates. [Visual, 23:04] Dave Grusch speaking in a video interview. [Dave Grusch, 23:05] What we’ve seen in previous administrations, like Clint- people the program thought Clint was going to disclose in the 90s, well, there was a burn-bag and shred party, um, at a particular agency in the mid 90s I’m aware of. [Visual, 23:17] Historic footage of an atomic bomb explosion, transitioning to hands holding a tape reel. [Narrator, 23:17] The Manhattan Project formed our proverbial onion. However, unlike the great schism of the Manhattan Project 2.0, which led to tremendous fracturing and weakening of the overall national effort to retrieve and exploit non-human technical vehicles, every single special access reform period, whether it be expansion or retraction of oversight, every time legacy was forced to silo one of its limbs within a cover office like the SAF/AA, even when the legacy program vested control into a quasi-government and industry control group, this all saw amplification, strengthening, and new layers added to the onion. [Visual, 23:21] Close-up of a rotating cassette tape, followed by a saucer UFO flying in circular clouds. [Visual, 23:23] A split-screen visual with a saucer UFO on the left labeled “MANHATTAN PROJECT 2.0” and a diagram on the right. [Visual, 23:34] President Ronald Reagan speaking, followed by tall metal silos. [Visual, 23:45] A low-angle view of industrial metal silos with the label “SAF/AA”. [Visual, 23:46] President Bill Clinton speaking. [Visual, 23:52] Animation of expanding concentric rings with text labels. [Visual, 24:00] A wall of black-and-white identification photos of project personnel. [Narrator, 24:00] The Manhattan Project’s secrecy apparatus itself can also be represented by a proverbial onion, sure. If you were a low-level physicist, you were subject to Vannevar Bush’s system of self-censorship, Groves’ compartmentalization, need-to-know access, the Manhattan Engineer District, the top policy group, numerous layers that kept ordinary people on the project always a step away from the core of the atomic project. [Visual, 24:06] Archival footage of workers passing through a checkpoint with a security sign. [Visual, 24:09] Portrait photos of Vannevar Bush, Leslie Groves, and others in front of a map. [Visual, 24:19] Footage of personnel working on technical equipment, overlaid with vertical stripes. [Visual, 24:27] A scientist in a hazmat suit with a flashlight near a crashed saucer UFO, with a Manhattan Project badge overlay. [Narrator, 24:27] Now, recontextualize that atomic project onion model for the Manhattan Project 2.0 in the 50s. With the addition of restricted data and special nuclear materials under the 1954 Atomic Energy Act, custody of non-human materials being delegated via classified presidential executive order, a special group focused on covert activities being established within the National Security Council, top secret codeword program access similar to NRO BYEMAN, and a litany of security protocols even more strict and expansive than the atomic project, overlaying this project portfolio. [Visual, 24:33] Cartoon illustration of a hand touching a green atomic model, with text annotations. [Visual, 24:40] Postcard of Sandia Laboratory, followed by a green hawk emblem, and archival footage of Eisenhower signing a bill with text annotations. [Visual, 24:51] A green dragon emblem badge, followed by a dark bunker tunnel entrance with the text ”+ SIGNIFICANTLY MORE”. [Visual, 25:00] Interior view of a large warehouse facility with a crane. [Visual, 25:04] A black screen with text bullet points, followed by a triangular black UFO with yellow lights rotating against a blue background. [Narrator, 25:04] Now imagine that same security system in the 1980s, but with a fractured centralized leadership group to direct and establish security baselines for this once mighty national effort, where program elements were forced to burrow even deeper into the shadows to hide from Pentagon audits. And throw in the Air Force and NRO program involvement being broken off and hidden within the Air Force SAF/AA, and understand that naval involvement is hidden within programs hidden within other programs, themselves hidden within even further programs, like the Polaris program and Sand Dollar. [Visual, 25:15] A bright light star-like portal in space. [Visual, 25:22] A satellite orbiting Earth, followed by the National Reconnaissance Office logo. [Visual, 25:29] Color-tinted depiction of a naval ship with a partially submerged saucer UFO. [Visual, 25:39] Three industrial metal silos. [Narrator, 25:40] Observe instances of projects within the armed forces and intelligence community being siloed into their own containers with a flat hierarchy. This leaves you with an onion model that, quite literally, doubles, triples, or even exponentially grows in size. [Visual, 25:49] A concentric radar animation with red labels. [Visual, 25:57] A whiteboard diagram drawing containing sketches and the text “FFRDC”. [Narrator, 25:57] Add to that, concentrated efforts in the early 2010s by specific FFRDCs and elements of the US government to, quite literally, restrict program history briefings on legacy incumbents, to purposefully keep new program personnel ignorant to the scope and history of the legacy program portfolio, and their specific siloed project. And no, I’m not joking there. [Visual, 26:06] Aerial sunset view of the Pentagon and Washington Monument, followed by a dark grey saucer UFO. [Visual, 26:18] Inside look of a dark hangar door opening. [Visual, 26:21] A man speaking in a wood-paneled room next to a microphone. [Visual, 26:23] Swirling abstract multi-colored patterns. [Narrator, 26:23] Thus today, we are left with an onion model of secrecy that is so vast, convoluted, and severe. I am willing to wager any amount of money the following statement is true, as I say this with the utmost confidence. Today, only 40 to 50 people alive, at any given time, know the full breadth and history of the programs. [Visual, 26:31] A rotating cassette tape followed by a tabletop desk filled with U.A.P. files and magazines. [Visual, 26:39] Inside a large hangar with a black saucer UFO, showing overlays “FULL KNOWLEDGE” and “40-50 PEOPLE”. [Visual, 26:48] Black-and-white animation of a rotating planet-like object. [Visual, 26:50] Video interview of Dr. John Craven with a lighthouse in the background. [Narrator, 26:50] Former chief scientist of the Navy Special Projects Office, Dr. John Pena Craven, said it best when speaking about the Sand Dollar compartmentalized program — a program I highly wager was involved in undersea UFO recoveries — with his, quote-unquote, “seventh veil” analogy, where even highly cleared individuals within top secret, unacknowledged classified projects, could never truly know if they’d reached the innermost layer of compartmentalization, or were, in fact, just working on a cover program in service of another cover program, going on for an unknown length of time. [Visual, 26:56] A book titled “THE SILENT WAR” open to a chapter titled “10 Spooked”, with text highlighted in yellow. [Visual, 27:05] Text on screen: “SEVENTH VEIL”. [Visual, 27:07] Aerial view of a city next to a river with a quoted text block overlaid. [Visual, 27:26] A document with hand-drawn annotations. [Visual, 27:27] Close-up of hands peeling an onion with a knife. [Narrator, 27:27] So as we investigate today, we cannot reconstruct the onion. But we can identify several of the layers that majorly factor into the modern-day security structure behind the mess that is the UFO legacy program portfolio. These include possibly one of the most robust and imperative, outer-ish layers of the onion: the very vessels under which UFO legacy activities operate, receive funding and appropriations, maintain a baseline level of security, classification, and need-to-know access, and the vessel legacy activities often mold and stretch to suit the needs of these covert operations. I am talking, of course, of special access programs, SAPs, out of the DoD and DoE, and their intelligence community equivalents, controlled access programs, or CAPs. [Visual, 27:31] A helicopter flying at night carrying a container. [Visual, 27:37] A pyramid diagram titled “UFO LEGACY PROGRAMS” showing levels of security and administration. [Visual, 27:43] View of Earth from orbit. [Visual, 27:49] Close-up of a metallic vehicle’s exterior. [Visual, 27:52] A sheet of printed $100 bills, followed by a document stamped “TOP SECRET”. [Visual, 28:01] Abstract blue and green swirling ink pattern. [Visual, 28:07] Aerial view of the Pentagon with text overlays describing “UFO LEGACY PROGRAMS”. [Visual, 28:19] Lines of blue computer code. [Visual, 28:20] A triangular black UFO rotating, with text “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP)“. [Narrator, 28:20] As the very structure of SAPs, which we will focus on significantly more than CAPs, is so fundamental to understanding UFO legacy programs, we will spend an exorbitant amount of time studying the ultra-strict definitions, history, authority, limitations, etc., of SAPs, and explain why exactly covert UFO activities have been for years hidden within special access programs, and their precursor black programs, under the authorities of Executive Order 10502, Executive Order 11652, and Executive Order 12356, as we outlined in part one. [Visual, 28:29] Two DoD documents regarding Special Access Programs shown side-by-side. [Visual, 28:39] A saucer shadow overlays the DoD documents. [Visual, 28:44] Black-and-white photo of President Eisenhower smiling. [Visual, 28:47] A soldier holding a flashlight near a crashed UFO in a field at night, with text labels “EO 10502”, “EO 11652”, and “EO 12356” appearing. [Visual, 28:58] A rotating digital globe with network lines. [Narrator, 28:58] Most critical to understand about SAPs actually goes far beyond the standard definition and application of SAPs, where SAPs are, quote, “established to control access, distribution, and provide protection for sensitive classified information beyond that normally required,” end quote. [Visual, 29:07] Aerial view of a stadium racetrack with a text box defining “What is a Special Access Program (SAP)?“. [Visual, 29:15] A man in a blue suit speaking at a microphone. [Narrator, 29:16] Indeed for us, it is crucial to understand the three types of SAPs: acquisition, intelligence, and operations and support programs, how such SAPs report to relevant OSD, or Office of the Secretary of Defense, offices that are culpable in legacy operations, including USD(I&S), or Intelligence and Security, USD(R&E), or Research and Engineering, and USD(A&S), or Acquisition and Sustainment; give examples of how each type of SAP can be implicated in UFO legacy activities; as well as really digest the consequence behind the categories of SAPs: acknowledged, unacknowledged, and waived. It is, in fact, the ability… [Visual, 29:17] Text overlay “SAP TYPES” on screen. [Visual, 29:21] A concrete hallway with text listing three SAP types. [Visual, 29:25] Aerial view of the Pentagon with text overlays listing OSD departments. [Visual, 29:33] First-person view from a fighter jet cockpit. [Visual, 29:35] Air Force aircraft on a carrier, with department badges appearing. [Visual, 29:44] An abstract graphic showing a saucer UFO inside a bubble with text “SAP TYPES → UFO LEGACY ACTIVITIES”. [Visual, 29:50] Red horizontal bars passing over a metallic shape. [Visual, 29:51] Workers in a hangar under a large aircraft wing. [Visual, 29:54] Graphic titled “PROTECTION LEVEL” listing SAP categories. [Visual, 29:58] Swirling yellow and blue patterns, transitioning to the Capitol dome. [Visual, 30:00] Capitol dome and US flag with on-screen text “TS//” [Narrator, 30:00] to waive unacknowledged SAPs with additional security protocols, legacy programs have enjoyed to hide from traditional oversight channels. [Visual, 30:01] Black screen with text “TS//SAR-##//WAIVED” and labels “SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED”, “ACCESS REQUIRED”, “TOP SECRET”, “PROGRAM NICKNAME”, “DISSEMINATION CONTROL” [Visual, 30:09] Man in a podcast studio with headphones, speaking into a microphone. [Narrator, 30:09] Of course guys, it’s me, so we will go much deeper here. We will not stop at a standard SAP analysis, and thorough investigation of the skeleton of the gatekeeping and governance structure of SAPs, including the SAPOC and SAPCO. [Visual, 30:13] Aerial shot of the Capitol dome at sunset. [Visual, 30:19] Aerial shot of the Capitol dome at dusk with on-screen text “SAP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE” and “SAP CENTRAL OFFICE” [Narrator, 30:23] And if you don’t know those definitions yet, don’t worry, cause we will get to them. [Visual, 30:24] A black staircase/ladder in a dark room. [Narrator, 30:27] But also introduce the subject of, quote unquote, content-only SAPs. [Visual, 30:27] Capitol dome under a blue sky. [Visual, 30:31] On-screen text “CONTENT-ONLY SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS” [Visual, 30:33] Hangar with a stealth-like aircraft. [Narrator, 30:33] Content-only SAPs are quite the ingenious loophole legacy programs, specifically the White House and National Security Council-run UFO crash retrieval activities, have employed. [Visual, 30:37] Close-up of the President’s seal. [Visual, 30:43] Aerial night view of the White House. [Narrator, 30:44] As we will discuss, content-only SAPs are not a type of SAP, but a descriptive funding/administrative designation, whereas a SAP holds or protects classified information, AKA content, [Visual, 30:45] Checklist on screen with items: “SAP TYPE” (cross), “PROTECTION LEVEL” (cross), “ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGNATION” (check), “HOLDS CPI ONLY” (check), “BUDGETARY DESCRIPTOR” (check) [Visual, 30:51] Document header “TOP SECRET” with the title “CONTENT-ONLY SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS” and list with checkmarks and crosses. [Narrator, 30:56] without dedicated program-specific funding lines, major resource allocation, or separate budgetary authority. Such a system has been enjoyed to completely waive reporting requirements, as indeed the SAP contains just information. [Visual, 30:57] Two document pages: Left page title “COMPLIANCE WITH CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION”, Right page title “SECURITY CLASSIFICATION GUIDE” with highlighted text “SAP Trust”. [Visual, 31:03] Aerial view of the Pentagon and Washington Monument. [Visual, 31:11] Three men sitting around a round table with microphones in a studio with wood paneling. [Narrator, 31:11] I strongly recommend, if you take one thing away from this project, it is the topic of content-only SAPs and what we summarize next. [Visual, 31:13] Close-up of the center man speaking. [Narrator, 31:20] In addition to content-only SAPs, we will distill what David Grusch stated on his incredible Judicial Watch interview. The topic of covert action programs, born out of 50 US Code 3093. [Visual, 31:20] A man in a blue suit and yellow striped tie speaking in an office environment with diplomas on the wall. [Visual, 31:27] On-screen text “COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” [Narrator, 31:33] As David Grusch stated, all eyes on the White House here, and specific importance on the National Security Council. And I love how when David Grusch spoke on this topic, he mentioned alongside Eisenhower and Truman being the genesis for legacy activities, specifically five people in the National Security Council were involved at one time in the programs. [Visual, 31:33] Black and white footage of the White House and fountain. [Visual, 31:37] Black and white footage of the White House with on-screen text “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL” [Visual, 31:40] Side-by-side screen showing Judicial Watch interviewer on the left, and David Grusch on the right. [Narrator, 31:54] Of course, part one focused heavily on Eisenhower’s NSC 5412/2 Committee special group, which was founded specifically to address covert actions. [Visual, 31:54] Yellow folder with “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL” and red tape labeled “NSC 5412/2” [Visual, 32:01] Black and white footage of Eisenhower and other officials standing. [Narrator, 32:05] Indeed, as I stated, Eisenhower relegated the NSC 5412/2 Committee special group as the UFO legacy program administrator. And guess how many people were in the 5412 Committee? That’s right, five. So, thank again, David Grusch. [Visual, 32:05] Black and white footage of Eisenhower stepping down from an airplane. [Visual, 32:09] Black and white footage of Eisenhower speaking with on-screen text: “NSC 5412 COMMITTEE SPECIAL GROUP CONTAINED ‘MAJ12’” [Visual, 32:17] Document text block explaining Taylor Report and Special Group. [Visual, 32:21] David Grusch speaking in the interview. [David Grusch, 32:21] Ah, that was one of the tricks of the trade, burying it over in the Department of Energy, but also keeping it in these non-covert action programs, that like, you know, five people in the NSC know about, and the President at one time, and then, you know, has custodianship over across the Potomac and McLean. [Visual, 32:37] Close-up of the President’s seal. [Narrator, 32:37] Anyways, as we will discuss, the White House and NSC have taken covert action programs, designated them as non-covert action programs by utilizing content-only SAPs and compartments, completely waiving reporting requirements, and use such vessels for legacy activities. [Visual, 32:42] On-screen text “COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” with an arrow pointing to the White House. [Visual, 32:44] Text “NON-COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” added, with “CONTENT-ONLY” pointing to the arrow. [Visual, 32:50] Hangar scene with the stealth aircraft and the diagram overlaid on it. [Narrator, 32:56] So again, I can’t stress this enough, if you recall just two things from this video, non-covert action programs and content-only SAPs are what I ask you to recall. [Visual, 32:56] Polaroid photo of the narrator on a desk. [Visual, 32:59] Two men in the studio talking, on-screen checklist showing “NON-COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” and “CONTENT-ONLY SAPS”. [Visual, 33:07] Two fighter jets flying over a landscape with spacecraft-like objects flying above them. [Narrator, 33:07] ingenious loopholes that have been historically utilized by the National Security Council’s UFO legacy program portfolio. [Visual, 33:15] Star trail pattern rotating, transitioning to a red radar-like display with circles. [Narrator, 33:15] Let us also, of course, address some of the more nefarious and disturbing inner-ish layers of the onion, program protection offices, [Visual, 33:17] Radar display showing labels: “NEED TO KNOW”, “CLASSIFICATION”, “AGENCY PROGRAM PROTECTION” (highlighted green), “CLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE ORDERS”. [Visual, 33:25] Men in a security/operations center looking at screens. [Narrator, 33:25] US agencies and services who see specific personnel and elements deputized to enforce UFO legacy activity security protocols, [Visual, 33:30] A badge and text “OSI”, with a pixelated face of a man in a suit. [Visual, 33:33] Fox News broadcast screen: “SEARCH FOR EVIDENCE”, “UAP WHISTLEBLOWER WORKS WITH CONGRESS ON TRANSPARENCY”, “SPECIAL REPORT SPOTLIGHT”. [Narrator, 33:33] akin to the antibodies David Grusch stirred when he heroically pursued the UFO issue. [Visual, 33:39] Glitch effect, transitioning to a large hangar with a triangular aircraft covered under a white sheet. [Narrator, 33:39] These offices are inherently tasked with safeguarding some of the United States’ most intimate national security secrets, operate deep within unacknowledged SAP channels, [Visual, 33:43] Top-down view of the triangular aircraft covered under the sheet. [Visual, 33:47] Close-up of a soldier wearing a gas mask/helmet. [Visual, 33:49] Soldiers in a room with gas masks preparing equipment. [Visual, 33:50] Glenn Gaffney speaking on stage, labeled “Glenn Gaffney, Tech Strategist, g2 Consulting Solutions”. [Narrator, 33:50] and often feature career spooks with, let’s just say, interesting careers in and out of government service, [Visual, 33:58] Close-up of the stealth aircraft’s dome/top. [Narrator, 33:58] effectively making a perfect gatekeeping structure to mitigate program exposure and neutralize outsider and insider threats. [Visual, 34:00] Red crosses over labels on screen: “UFO LEGACY PROGRAMS”, “PROGRAM PROTECTION”, “TRADITIONAL OVERSIGHT” (red X), “INSIDER & OUTSIDER THREATS” (red X). [Visual, 34:07] A military jet refueling mid-air. [Narrator, 34:07] One of the most prolific examples here, which we will actually not spend too much time on as I covered this office and individual extensively in my Air Force project, [Visual, 34:17] Document page: “Office of Special Projects” with a group photo in front of a spacecraft. [Narrator, 34:17] is the AFOSI PJ, or Air Force Office of Special Investigations’ Office of Special Projects. [Visual, 34:20] Document page: “PJ On the Case” with an insignia and a photo of a man in a mask. [Visual, 34:24] Insignia of “OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS” with the Latin motto “SECRETUM CONSERVO POPULI”. [Narrator, 34:24] PJ is OSI’s office tasked with safeguarding the Air Force’s most sensitive and national security imperative Top Secret research, development, and acquisition programs. [Visual, 34:34] Graphic equalizer display with lines. [Narrator, 34:34] And I am aware of specific instances in which former PJ Executive Director and former director of the entire Air Force SAP Security Enterprise, and now Vice President for Security at Northrop Grumman, Terry Phillips, [Visual, 34:37] Photo of Terry W. Phillips in suit with list: “SES-1”, “AFOSUPJ EXECUTIVE DIR.”, “USAF SAP SECURITY DIR.”, “SENIOR VP, CSO - LAIDOS”, “VP, SECURITY - NG”. [Visual, 34:47] Name card “TERRY W. PHILLIPS” on screen. [Visual, 34:49] Side-by-side photos of Terry W. Phillips and Lee M. Russ. [Narrator, 34:49] and current PJ Executive Director and director of the entire Air Force SAP Security Enterprise, Mr. Lee M. Russ, have acted as attack dogs for the UFO legacy architecture. I would go so far as to say, Terry and Lee are quite integral figures to legacy operations. [Visual, 34:56] Organizational chart with photos of Terry W. Phillips, Lee M. Russ, and arrows pointing down to a soldier and two question mark faces. [Visual, 35:08] Static glitch transition, then aerial view of the Pentagon with two helicopters landing. [Narrator, 35:08] Indeed today, we will mainly focus on three such program protection offices deputized to operate as legacy program Gestapo. [Visual, 35:17] DARPA logo. [Narrator, 35:17] The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Security and Intelligence Directorate, or DARPA SID; Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Information Protection Directorate, or AFLCMC IP; and the Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, or OICI. [Visual, 35:20] Side-by-side seals: “SID Security & Intelligence Directorate” and “Access Control Specialist”. [Visual, 35:24] Air Force LCMC seal. [Visual, 35:26] AFLCMC Information Protection seal. [Visual, 35:30] Department of Energy building exterior. [Visual, 35:32] On-screen text “OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE & COUNTERINTELLIGENCE” [Visual, 35:36] DARPA logo in white on blue background. [Narrator, 35:36] On the subject of DARPA, I am going to introduce a legacy program senior who operates a very senior role within the program currently, as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Critical Technologies out of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, USD(R&E). [Visual, 35:37] Factory assembly line showing microchips/circuit boards. [Visual, 35:39] Meeting with DARPA logo on table and drones flying. [Visual, 35:41] Jet in a hangar, taking off. [Visual, 35:42] Person filming night sky. [Visual, 35:43] Silhouette of a person walking out of a hangar at sunset. [Visual, 35:44] Close-up of “DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY” building wall. [Visual, 35:45] Aerial view of the Capitol at dusk with on-screen text: “PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES” and “OFFICE OF THE UNDERSECRETARY OF DEFENSE (RESEARCH & ENGINEERING)“. [Visual, 35:54] Glitch overlay with “NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY” and “DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH” [Narrator, 35:54] Former director of research at the NGA, former director of IARPA, or the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency, and former deputy director and director of DARPA, Dr. Peter Highnam. [Visual, 35:56] IARPA logo and text. [Visual, 36:01] DARPA logo. [Visual, 36:05] Dr. Peter Highnam speaking, labeled “Peter Highnam, Deputy Director, DARPA”. [Visual, 36:07] Dr. Peter Highnam in a casual setting, walking and speaking. [Narrator, 36:07] People want names, and here is a name of an individual at the highest echelons of UFO legacy program science and technology currently. [Visual, 36:16] Side-by-side-by-side seals of Department of Energy, DARPA SID, and AFLCMC. [Narrator, 36:16] We will investigate each of these offices’ missions, their cognizant authority, intriguing personnel, and outline my argument why these three offices in particular, plus AFOSI PJ, are some of the most critical legacy program protection features. [Visual, 36:26] Side-by-side-by-side seals of Department of Energy, DARPA SID, and AFLCMC, plus AFOSI PJ on the right. [Visual, 36:33] Static screen showing a crowd, then radar screen showing labels: “DISINFO/NARRATIVE MANAGEMENT” and “AARO COIN”. [Narrator, 36:33] I would also be remiss to not speak a bit on the surface of the onion, disinformation and narrative control. [Visual, 36:40] Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick sitting at a hearing table, labeled “Dr. Kirkpatrick”. [Narrator, 36:40] The UFO topic is rife with disinformation, information control, narrative campaigns, etc. and has been for decades. [Visual, 36:48] Black and white footage of a clapperboard from 1952 reading “FLYING SAUCERS”. [Narrator, 36:48] So, I would like to quickly revisit the stigma that was carefully manufactured to make this topic obscure and appear nonsensical. [Visual, 36:51] Black and white footage of a metal flying saucer replica hanging from a string. [Visual, 36:56] Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick speaking during an interview labeled “nightline”. [Narrator, 36:56] I would also like to revisit the legacy apparatus’ most recent narrative management tool, AARO, and speak more on former disgraced AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick and his many half-truths and lies. [Visual, 37:02] Seal of AARO and photo of Sean Kirkpatrick, labeled “Sean Kirkpatrick, Director, All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO)“. [Visual, 37:09] Luis Elizondo walking outdoors. [Narrator, 37:09] Most consequently to the topic of narrative control and information ops, will be to touch on the AATIP cover program, Luis Elizondo, To The Stars Academy, and the coordinated attempt to prop up Hillary Clinton as the disclosure president. [Visual, 37:12] Luis Elizondo walking with the Washington Monument in background. [Visual, 37:16] Luis Elizondo writing on a blackboard. [Visual, 37:18] Logo of “TO THE STARS… ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCE”. [Visual, 37:19] Hillary Clinton speaking with US flags in the background, labeled “WSJ”. [Visual, 37:24] Luis Elizondo speaking in a chair. [Luis Elizondo, 37:24] What else you want to know? [Visual, 37:25] Title card “AATIP” and “ADVANCED AEROSPACE THREAT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM”. [Narrator, 37:25] In summary, the AATIP cover program for all intents and purposes, operated as a cover for several National Security Council activities under DNI and former USD(I&S) Lieutenant General James Clapper, as a way to talk about the onion outside of the onion. [Visual, 37:29] Seal of Executive Office of the President of the United States. [Visual, 37:33] James Clapper speaking, labeled “JAMES CLAPPER, USAF LTG/DNI/USD(I&S)/DIR DIA” and “AATIP” with letters floating. [Visual, 37:38] Hand slicing an onion in half. [Narrator, 37:38] The frontman for this operation was indeed Lou Elizondo, who has far more of an intimate history with quote unquote national programs, USD(I&S), and the National Security Council than he has ever let on. [Visual, 37:41] Close-up of Luis Elizondo speaking, with “NEWS NATION” logo. [Visual, 37:46] Aerial view of the Pentagon. [Visual, 37:54] Department of Defense sign in a hallway. [Visual, 37:57] Presidential seal close-up. [Narrator, 37:57] We will extend coverage of this bizarre partial disclosure campaign and touch on the fallacies and partial truths outlined by Elizondo and others, within the Age of Disclosure documentary that attempted a revisionist structure of the legacy programs, plural, likely to delegate who gets to catch the live hand grenade when disclosure finally comes. [Visual, 38:03] Back view of Luis Elizondo and another man walking down a corridor. [Visual, 38:06] Title card “THE AGE OF DISCLOSURE” with CIA seal. [Visual, 38:09] Flowchart diagram: “THE LEGACY PROGRAM” leading to “DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY”, “DEFENSE CONTRACTORS”, and “UNITED STATES AIR FORCE” under “CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY”. [Visual, 38:12] Inside view of the CIA headquarters lobby with the seal on the floor. [Visual, 38:18] View of a crescent moon. [Narrator, 38:18] And lastly, we will touch on the topic of unrivaled secrecy. Numerous small or sub-layers the legacy apparatus harnesses and have harnessed to maintain total secrecy. [Visual, 38:19] Dark hallway with lights on the ceiling, with text “UNRIVALED SECRECY”. [Visual, 38:24] Red radar/sonar pattern with circles. [Visual, 38:30] Blue radar display. [Narrator, 38:30] We will discuss cover offices and programs, gatekeeping structures, administrative terrorism, the subject of wet works, and prospective whistleblowers possibly permanently being silenced. The practice of hiding in plain sight, frankly ingenious misappropriation of funds and funding schemes, information siloing through GOCO and FFRDCs, program siloing leading to egregious redundancies, and so much more. [Visual, 38:31] Seal of the Air Force Office of Special Projects with eagle. [Visual, 38:33] Loading bar screen. [Visual, 38:34] Radar display showing satellite coordinates. [Visual, 38:35] David Grusch speaking in a hearing, labeled “Mr. Grusch”. [Visual, 38:36] Hands holding and aiming a handgun. [Visual, 38:38] Photo of a military pilot standing in front of a fighter jet. [Visual, 38:42] Aerial view of the Pentagon with glitch pattern. [Visual, 38:44] Stack of one hundred dollar bills. [Visual, 38:48] Tall industrial metal silos, labeled “GOVERNMENT-OWNED, CONTRACTOR-OPERATED” and “FEDERALLY FUNDED R&D CENTERS”. [Visual, 38:52] Three silos with an arrow indicating loop. [Visual, 38:55] Camera looking at the White House press briefing podium. [Visual, 38:57] A triangular spacecraft-like object inside a fenced facility at night. [Narrator, 38:57] So, let’s waste no more time and dive right in. [Visual, 39:01] Black screen. [Visual, 39:02] A stealth aircraft dome with text: “SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED” [Visual, 39:08] Representative Moskowitz speaking in a hearing, labeled “MR. MOSKOWITZ”. [Jared Moskowitz, 39:08] And when you say that they’re above congressional oversight, what do you mean? [Visual, 39:12] David Grusch speaking in a hearing, labeled “Mr. Grusch”. [David Grusch, 39:12] Uh, complicated question. Uh, so there’s, you know, some, I would call it abuse here. So, congressional oversight of conventional special special access programs, and I’ll use Title 10, so DoD as an example, right? So, 10 U.S. Code section 119 discusses congressional oversight of SAPs, discusses, uh, the, the DepSecDef’s ability to waive congressional reporting, however the Gang of Eight is at least supposed to be notified of, uh, you know, waived or waived-bigoted, unacknowledged SAP is, uh, created, and that’s public law. [Visual, 39:44] David Grusch speaking in a hearing. [Narrator, 39:44] The 2023 revelations of David Grusch strongly cemented the reality of the UFO legacy program modus operandi. The retrieval, storage, exploitation, and possibly a host of weirder activities, such as communication, being housed within national [Visual, 39:48] A disc-shaped UFO flying above snow-capped mountains. [Visual, 39:52] Black and white view looking up at a metal staircase/structure inside a silo/facility. [Visual, 39:57] Glitchy graphic equalizer display. [Visual, 39:59] Black and white aerial view of the Pentagon. [Visual, 40:00] Aerial view of the Pentagon at night [Narrator, 40:00] programs. Specifically Special Access Programs, or SAPs, as I have called and will call them from here on out. [Visual, 40:02] SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS text overlay [Visual, 40:06] Three men sitting at a studio desk [Narrator, 40:07] Indeed, in every single project of mine, you will hear me speak ad nauseam about elements of legacy activities being housed within SAPs. [Visual, 40:16] Digital Earth network graphic [Narrator, 40:16] So, I think it necessary and, quite frankly, mandatory, we finally step back and get ultra-specific on why such covert UFO activities have been hidden within SAPs for decades. [Visual, 40:23] Flying saucer craft in a hangar with SAP text overlay [Visual, 40:30] DoD Instruction 5205.11 and DoD Manual 5205.07 document pages [Narrator, 40:30] Identify how the structure of SAPs is perfect for this need-to-know ecosystem… [Visual, 40:34] Washington D.C. skyline at dusk [Narrator, 40:35] …and get real specific on loopholes harnessed to keep such activities free from traditional oversight channels. [Visual, 40:41] Cassette tape spinning [Narrator, 40:42] Sure, this section may be a little academic at first, but I absolutely implore you to pay close attention and keep notes… [Visual, 40:46] Narrator wearing headphones in recording studio [Narrator, 40:47] …because Special Access Programs plus additional access protocols, as well as some creative loopholes, are the vehicles through which UFO legacy programs operate, get funded, and stay hidden from congressional oversight, and those they consider, quote-unquote, temporary employees. [Visual, 40:51] Hangar with stealth jets and Special Access Programs text bullets [Visual, 40:57] ”+ LOOPHOLES/LEGAL MOLDING” text added to screen [Visual, 41:00] Stack of US hundred-dollar bills [Visual, 41:02] Capitol building at night [Visual, 41:09] Narrator in a studio with green background lighting [Narrator, 41:09] And if you’re like me and want some physical materials to follow along, two documents I would strongly recommend keeping handy are DoD Instruction 5205.11, Management, Administration, and Oversight of DoD Special Access Programs, as well as DoD Instruction 5205.07, Special Access Program Security Manual. [Visual, 41:13] Nebula cloud animation [Visual, 41:16] DoD Instruction 5205.11 document page [Visual, 41:25] DoD Manual 5205.07 document page [Visual, 41:31] Ringed planet in space [Narrator, 41:33] The term Special Access Program was first acknowledged in the 1980s. And prior to the 80s, precursors to SAPs did indeed exist, but as what one might call black programs. [Visual, 41:34] Soldiers loading a stretcher into a helicopter at night [Visual, 41:38] Stealth fighter jet moving at night [Visual, 41:42] BLACK PROGRAMS text overlay [Visual, 41:45] Close-up of satellite camera instrumentation [Narrator, 41:45] This era of black programs consisted of the early days of the NRO, stealth aircraft programs out of the Lockheed Skunk Works, etc. [Visual, 41:50] Jet cockpit view flying over clouds [Visual, 41:55] Timecode display counting [Narrator, 41:55] As we’ve discussed so far in Part 1 and here in Part 2 at length, national programs critical to national security, US classification standards, and oversight of compartmented, need-to-know programs have fluctuated greatly from the 1947 National Security Act until present. [Visual, 42:00] Capitol dome at night with text overlay [Visual, 42:02] Document with red TOP SECRET stamp [Visual, 42:04] Aerial view of the Pentagon [Visual, 42:08] Sine wave animation with 1947 National Security Act and Present markers [Visual, 42:13] President Dwight D. Eisenhower speaking [Narrator, 42:13] Specifically in Part 1, we referenced Eisenhower’s Executive Order 10501, which removed the restricted classification designation, and introduced the era of ad hoc security protocols on sensitive programs, such as Top Secret codeword access, really introducing the concept of, quote-unquote, special access. [Visual, 42:17] Federal Register page and classification checklist with Restricted crossed out [Visual, 42:23] Flying saucer next to classification checklist [Visual, 42:28] TOP SECRET CODEWORD ACCESS text overlay [Visual, 42:35] President Richard Nixon standing in Congress [Narrator, 42:36] In Part 1, we also referenced Nixon’s 1972 Executive Order 11652, which saw the formal framework for Special Access Programs established, resulting in widespread concern of uncontrolled and rampant growth of unauthorized applications of special access labels across DoD departments, with the House Committee on Government Operations report discussing, quote, ‘widespread use of dozens of special access, distribution, or control labels, stamps, or markings on both classified and unclassified documents,’ end quote. [Visual, 42:38] Federal Register page for Executive Order 11652 [Visual, 42:43] Three pages of Executive Order 11652 [Visual, 42:57] Capitol building dome under cloudy skies [Visual, 43:00] Printed document titled Use of Access, Distribution, or Control Markings [Narrator, 43:11] These access controls were harnessed by, quote, ‘many executive agencies having classification authority and dozens of other agencies who do not possess such authority,’ end quote. [Visual, 43:22] President Ronald Reagan speaking [Narrator, 43:23] Finally, we discussed Reagan’s 1982 Executive Order 12356, which expanded the categories of classifiable information and lowered the threshold for classification, essentially tightening the grip of government secrecy from Carter’s previous administration’s attempts of government secrecy shifting towards declassification and transparency. [Visual, 43:25] Federal Register page for Executive Order 12356 [Visual, 43:28] Three Federal Register documents side-by-side [Visual, 43:34] President Jimmy Carter speaking [Visual, 43:45] Narrator in front of green background lighting [Narrator, 43:45] However, as we discussed in Part 1, EO 12356 essentially ended the wild, wild west days of the golden age of legacy, with the removal of Top Secret codeword access. This, plus the revelations of the Yellow Fruit USAP, led to the great program schism we spoke on so much. [Visual, 43:47] Federal Register page next to desert hills [Visual, 43:57] YELLOW FRUIT USAP document excerpt [Visual, 44:04] Scrolling green computer code [Visual, 44:05] Pentagon aerial view with blue light effect [Narrator, 44:05] But I digress here. Today the framework of Special Access Programs are primarily managed, authorized, and run out of the Department of Defense, and governed by Executive Order 13526, titled, quote, ‘Classified National Security Information,’ end quote. [Visual, 44:07] Department of Defense seal [Visual, 44:14] Federal Register page for EO 13526 [Visual, 44:21] Department of Defense seal and digital globe with text overlay [Narrator, 44:21] Because remember here, the intelligence community has their own special programs, CAPs, Controlled Access Programs, and the Atomic Energy Commission, now the Department of Energy, has their own Special Access Programs governed by the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. But put a pin in that for later. [Visual, 44:24] Seals of Department of Defense and Intelligence Community [Visual, 44:29] Seals of DoD, Intelligence Community, and Department of Energy [Visual, 44:33] Table showing differing statutory authorities [Visual, 44:40] Dark capsule spacecraft in orbit [Narrator, 44:40] Executive Order 13526 defines a SAP as a, quote, ‘program established for a specific class of classified information that imposes safeguarding and access requirements exceeding those normally required for information at the same classification level,’ end quote. [Visual, 44:44] Text overlay of EO 13526 definition of a SAP [Visual, 44:57] Stealth aircraft in a hangar [Narrator, 44:58] SAPs are established when a program is required by statute, or according to the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency’s SAP training course, which we will be referencing quite often, quote, ‘upon the finding of exceptional vulnerability of, or threat to, specific information, and if the normal criteria for determining access to information classified at the same level are insufficient,’ end quote. [Visual, 45:03] US flag and the Capitol building [Visual, 45:05] Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency seal [Visual, 45:08] Narrator presenting in a conference room [Visual, 45:10] Highlighted document page detailing when SAPs are established [Visual, 45:24] American flags waving in front of a building [Narrator, 45:24] The existence of Special Access Programs are imperative to US national security for several reasons. [Visual, 45:30] Silhouette of communication tower at sunset [Narrator, 45:30] Some SAPs protect technology breakthroughs and ensure the US maintains its leading technological edge. Some SAPs, once - wait, some SAPs, according to the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, quote, ‘ensure once we discover and exploit an adversary’s vulnerabilities, the knowledge of the exploitation remains secure and the adversary does not develop a countermeasure,’ end quote. [Visual, 45:31] Military drone silhouette against sunset [Visual, 45:36] Stealth bomber on runway [Visual, 45:42] Text overlay explaining the importance of SAPs [Visual, 45:54] Soldier wearing protective gear and gas mask [Narrator, 45:54] Some SAPs ensure sensitive operational plans are completed without disclosure, and some SAPs protect sensitive intelligence information. [Visual, 45:59] Satellite orbiting in space [Visual, 46:03] DoD Instruction 5205.11 document page [Narrator, 46:03] I am willing to bet I do not need to explain why such a system is perfect for a portfolio of programs founded of exceptionally higher security than that of the atomic bomb project, tasked with top-secret retrieval, exploitation, and storage of non-human technical vehicles, mandated to be hidden from both US adversaries and any USG element not deemed, quote-unquote, need to know. [Visual, 46:08] Photograph of J. Robert Oppenheimer [Visual, 46:14] Flying saucer flying through clouds [Visual, 46:20] Tanks in a military parade [Visual, 46:24] Capitol dome building [Visual, 46:29] Cassette recorder button labeled REW being pressed [Narrator, 46:29] And before we move any further, let’s clear up just a few misconceptions about SAPs. [Visual, 46:34] Pile of money with SAP text overlay [Narrator, 46:34] SAPs are not a method to hide money spent on certain programs. [Visual, 46:36] Red X drawn over the SAP box [Visual, 46:39] Drone on runway with SAP text overlay [Narrator, 46:39] SAPs are used to ensure the security and accountability of a specific project is maintained to the highest level. [Visual, 46:46] Narrator in blue suit speaking [Narrator, 46:47] Of course, as we have prior and will discuss further, legacy programs have used several loopholes to misappropriate illegal and inappropriate funding streams for their portfolio of UFO SAPs. [Visual, 46:50] Hangar interior labeled S4 opening to show flying saucers [Visual, 46:58] Document with red TOP SECRET stamp [Narrator, 47:00] Additionally, SAPs are not a classification designation, like Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret. [Visual, 47:00] Red X over SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS text [Visual, 47:03] Checklist of classification levels: Confidential, Secret, Top Secret [Visual, 47:07] Aerial view of a military base at night [Narrator, 47:07] No, SAPs use the standard level of classification, so in simplest terms, a SAP is a classified and compartmented, sensitive research, acquisition, intelligence, or operational activities program with enhanced safeguarding and access requirements. [Visual, 47:11] DoD Instruction 5205.11 document pages [Visual, 47:22] Congressional hearing room [Congressman, 47:23] There’s nothing that you’re aware of that is above Special Access Program classification. [Visual, 47:28] David Grusch at hearing table [David Grusch, 47:28] It’s a misnomer that there’s anything actually above Top Secret. Executive Order 13526 delineates the classification levels. [Visual, 47:35] Cassette tape spinning [Narrator, 47:35] If you are with me so far, just to contextualize here, some infamous examples of SAPs in the past include the F-117A Nighthawk, B-21 Raider, RQ-180, and Yellow Fruit we spoke on in Part 1. [Visual, 47:39] Silhouetted flight of F-117 [Visual, 47:41] F-117 Nighthawk landing [Visual, 47:43] B-21 Raider bomber [Visual, 47:44] Hangar housing stealth drone (RQ-180) [Visual, 47:47] Soldier boarding a helicopter [Visual, 47:50] Digital microchip circuitry [Narrator, 47:50] SAPs are inherently designed to compartment information and employ need-to-know access. [Visual, 47:52] Camera lens close-up [Visual, 47:56] Narrator in front of green background lighting [Narrator, 47:57] Indeed in Part 1, we discussed how the Manhattan Project inspired and influenced such controls. [Visual, 48:02] Section 5: Security page of DoD Instruction 5205.11 [Narrator, 48:03] For one to access a SAP, they must possess an appropriate need-to-know assessed and determined by a designated access approval authority. [Visual, 48:12] Jet pilot helmet close-up [Narrator, 48:13] SAPs are so securely safeguarded that access to a SAP is limited to the minimum number of individuals essential for program success, irrespective of rank, title, or position. [Visual, 48:21] Jet cockpit view over the sea [Visual, 48:24] Flying saucer flying over hills [Narrator, 48:25] Shifting over for a moment to legacy activities here, I am aware of read-ins to a specific legacy activity SAP being kept so small and minimal, program personnel were often given additional work tasks below their paygrade to avoid reading in additional personnel. [Visual, 48:28] Earth at night showing city lights [Visual, 48:34] Personnel in hazmat suits in the desert [Narrator, 48:41] An example there would include a senior scientist also performing account management, or an industrial security professional also performing janitorial work. [Visual, 48:42] Flying saucer in a hangar viewed from above [Visual, 48:47] Saucer craft with steps leading to it [Visual, 48:52] President Truman signing a document [Narrator, 48:52] And just so we can be clear here, we discussed this at length in Part 1, but real fast: what exactly is and determines need-to-know? [Visual, 48:57] Soldier looking through night vision scope [Narrator, 48:58] To quote again the DCSA SAP training course, need-to-know is defined as a, quote, ‘fundamental principle in the protection of classified information and the protection of SAPs. It is not enough just to have the appropriate clearance and formal approval to access a SAP. In addition, a person must have a need-to-know that pertains to the specific information,’ end quote. [Visual, 49:07] Night vision view of helicopter landing with text overlay definition [Visual, 49:24] Aerial view of the Pentagon [Narrator, 49:25] A SAP operates with an intriguing hierarchy, a system of further compartmentalization within the program to further isolate programs. [Visual, 49:26] Pentagon highlighted with SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM text [Visual, 49:33] Black umbrella in the rain [Narrator, 49:34] Thus, SAPs are structured into hierarchical tiers called, quote-unquote, umbrellas. [Visual, 49:39] Hierarchical chart of a Sample Hierarchy [Narrator, 49:40] Beneath a SAP umbrella sits several SAP compartments, and below these compartments sit several SAP sub-compartments housing several operational projects. This framework is organized to group similar capabilities or information into a single sub-compartment or compartment, similar critical program information, CPI. [Visual, 50:00] Diagram of SAP hierarchical structure [Narrator, 50:00] here is grouped into a single SAP. [Visual, 50:03] Black flag with “POLARIS” [Narrator, 50:03] We covered several such examples in part one, such as the Polaris submarine special program housing numerous hidden programs, which in turn held the Sand Dollar covert program that I am highly confident was involved in under-sea UFO retrieval operations. [Visual, 50:07] Text “POLARIS PROGRAM” [Visual, 50:12] Text “SAND DOLLAR” [Visual, 50:17] Launch of Polaris missile from submarine [Visual, 50:19] Document pages showing “THE YELLOW FRUIT PROJECT” [Narrator, 50:19] We additionally discussed the Army Special Operations Division’s sought Yellow Fruit USAP, which contained several classified operations as well as the Army’s CIA support for Latin American operations. [Visual, 50:31] Aerial view of the Pentagon [Narrator, 50:31] This umbrella structure makes it shockingly easy to take an already classified program and further compartment and hide both projects and information within. [Visual, 50:41] Gray vertical glitch transition [Visual, 50:42] View of Earth from space [Narrator, 50:42] Even the naming of special access programs are meant to compartment and hide information. SAPs commonly use an unclassified nickname comprised of two unrelated words that represent what’s known as a program identifier or PID. [Visual, 50:48] B-2 stealth bomber on tarmac [Narrator, 50:57] Think here of Yellow Fruit, or the 2010 Department of Homeland Security prospective special access program Kona Blue, [Visual, 50:58] Text “YELLOW FRUIT” [Visual, 51:00] Text “KONA BLUE” [Visual, 51:03] B-2 bomber flying over grassy field [Visual, 51:05] Document titled “KONA BLUE” with classification markings [Narrator, 51:05] which was meant to serve as a vehicle for Lockheed Martin to pass UFO materials to the AAWSAP program as examples here. [Visual, 51:12] Grid of military video screens [Narrator, 51:12] In addition to the two-word unclassified nickname representing the program identifier, PID, sometimes the Special Access Program Central Office, SAPCO, might add an additional singular classified codeword onto a program for enhanced compartmentation. [Visual, 51:18] Text “UNCLASS NICKNAME + CLASS CODEWORD (OPTIONAL)” [Visual, 51:27] Close-up of rotating cassette tape [Narrator, 51:27] So, here’s an example for a naming convention for a SAP: [Visual, 51:31] Text “TS//SAR-HANGAR BULLY//WAIVED” [Narrator, 51:31] TS, SAR, Hangar Bully, waived, [Visual, 51:35] Diagram explaining naming convention components [Narrator, 51:35] where TS means Top Secret classification, SAR means Special Access Required, Hangar Bully is the unclassified nickname representing the program identifier, and waived is an additional control marking slash secondary layer of security we will expand on momentarily. [Visual, 51:53] Document slide of “KONA BLUE” highlighting “UNACKNOWLEDGED, WAIVED” [Narrator, 51:53] Another example is the Kona Blue marking on-screen now with the additional control marker of NOFORN, short for not releasable to foreign nationals. And I am aware of specific UFO-related SAPs in the early 2000s that extensively featured waived and NOFORN controls. [Visual, 52:02] Animated UFO flying and crashing in desert [Visual, 52:12] Close-up of cassette tape [Narrator, 52:12] To make this even more complicated here, I am aware of testimony from whistleblowers who have sworn statements before Congress that SAPs housing UFO legacy activities routinely rotate names, possibly even as frequently as monthly, for the purpose of more easily identifying security leaks. [Visual, 52:19] UFO inside hangar [Visual, 52:23] Figures walking near desert bunker entrance [Visual, 52:31] Rotating white concentric circles [Visual, 52:32] Washington D.C. skyline at night showing the Pentagon [Narrator, 52:32] But before we get too ahead of our skis here, let’s rewind and start to break down the tangible functions and delineations of SAPs. [Visual, 52:41] Text “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS” over Earth from space [Narrator, 52:41] SAPs are divided into three principal categories: acquisition programs, intelligence programs, and operational programs involving active missions or activities. [Visual, 52:45] List of three SAP categories [Narrator, 52:51] These three principal categories are further distinguished by three classification categories or protection levels: acknowledged, unacknowledged, and waived. [Visual, 52:52] Close-up of the Presidential Seal [Visual, 52:53] Diagram tree of SAP types and protection levels [Narrator, 53:02] Acquisition SAPs comprise the vast majority of Department of Defense special programs, constituting 75 to 80 percent of all SAPs. [Visual, 53:03] Flowchart highlighting ACQUISITION category branch [Visual, 53:08] Aerial view of the Pentagon with text “ACQUISITION SAPS = 75-80% OF ALL SAPS” [Visual, 53:13] Document titled “Student Guide” highlighting text in yellow [Narrator, 53:13] Acquisition programs focus on protecting sensitive RDTE, or research, development, test, and evaluation, modification, and procurement efforts that, if compromised, would reveal critical asymmetric technological capabilities or vulnerabilities. [Visual, 53:29] Policy document “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM POLICY” [Narrator, 53:29] Oversight for acquisition SAPs fall under the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, USD(A&S). [Visual, 53:32] Seal of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition and Sustainment [Visual, 53:37] Memorandum titled “Special Access Program Corporate Portfolio Program Establishment” [Narrator, 53:37] USD(A&S) manages the SAP corporate portfolio to integrate corporate work on carve-out contracts within broader defense acquisition strategies. [Visual, 53:48] Narrator speaking in front of green lit background [Narrator, 53:48] If you have watched a single one of my projects, you will immediately recall the consequences of the USD(A&S), whose office has been previously known as the USD(A&T) or USD(AT&L). [Visual, 53:54] Seal of USD(A&S) with text “USD(A&S) → USD(A&T) → USD(AT&L)” [Visual, 54:02] EWD Notes document page dated “10/16/02” [Narrator, 54:02] The Wilson Davis Notes—I said this in part one, and I mean it again. I talk about these allegedly leaked notes so often I will not give a summary past one to two sentences. [Visual, 54:14] Brief clip of alien puppet [Visual, 54:15] Richard Dolan speaking on a podcast [Narrator, 54:15] As always, I do question the credibility of the man who generated this document, Dr. Eric Davis, but I do believe the fundamental facts of this document to be indeed true, [Visual, 54:21] EWD Notes document pages side-by-side [Visual, 54:25] DIA and US flags waving [Narrator, 54:25] that in the late 1990s, as deputy director of the DIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, [Visual, 54:28] Sign “Defense Intelligence Agency” [Visual, 54:30] Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson at podium [Narrator, 54:30] Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson attempted to brute force a read-in into the legacy program portfolio but was ultimately stonewalled even with appropriate access credentials. [Visual, 54:41] Three men discussing at a table [Narrator, 54:41] Indeed, I additionally believe Wilson shared his misadventures with Davis. [Visual, 54:46] Bill Clinton speaking at podium with officials [Narrator, 54:46] Within these notes, Admiral Wilson allegedly stated that in 1994, under sweeping SAP changes under then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Bill Perry, the UFO legacy program portfolio was reorganized into a separate special records group, quote, “a special subset of the unacknowledged/carve-outs/waived programs, not belonging to usual SAP divisions,” end quote. [Visual, 54:50] 1994 memorandum document page regarding SAP policy [Visual, 54:56] Flying saucer over sky background with document text [Visual, 55:03] Excerpt of EWD Notes text showing the quote [Visual, 55:12] Admiral Thomas Wilson at podium [Narrator, 55:12] The document then states the SAPOC, or Special Access Program Oversight Committee’s newly established in 1994 Senior Review Group, SRG, served as a stalwart gatekeeping structure for legacy activities from even appropriately cleared agency directors. [Visual, 55:14] Text “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE” [Visual, 55:20] Text “SENIOR REVIEW GROUP” [Visual, 55:22] Metallic flying saucer in hangar (monochrome) [Visual, 55:30] Deputy Secretary Bill Perry speaking at podium [Narrator, 55:30] In short, the document is stating Bill Perry’s 1994 actions to significantly strengthen and enhance DoD SAP management and control structures saw introduction of a Goliath gatekeeping structure within DoD’s internal SAP channels, specifically within SAPCO and SAPOC SRG—and don’t worry, we will spend time distilling these terms. [Visual, 55:32] Policy document page over Bill Perry [Visual, 55:40] UFO flying over yellow/green landscape [Visual, 55:48] Text “SAPOC SRG” and “SAPCO” [Visual, 55:54] Narrator speaking in front of green background [Narrator, 55:54] And to my understanding, this is absolutely true. [Visual, 55:58] President Bill Clinton speaking [Narrator, 55:58] I understand that in 1994, to hide from Clinton’s disclosure appetite, legacy programs under Bill Perry’s SAP management and control structure expansion saw both gatekeeping duties largely tasked to the SAPOC SRG, but infinitely more important here, [Visual, 56:03] Bill Clinton and Bill Perry at podium [Visual, 56:09] Green-tinted hallway [Visual, 56:14] Tape player button “REW” close-up [Visual, 56:16] Night view of the Capitol dome [Narrator, 56:16] this also saw the legacy structure permanently vest top-down program control out of exclusively the USG, shifting the control structure to a quasi-government and industry control group of a handful over two dozen individuals. [Visual, 56:24] Text “QUASI USG/INDUSTRY CONTROL GROUP”, “1994”, and figures [Visual, 56:32] Cassette tape spinning [Narrator, 56:32] We will of course talk about this much more, but let’s rein it in here and get back to acquisition SAPs, whose oversight authoritative body is the USD(A&S), again, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. [Visual, 56:35] Workers cleaning aircraft windshield [Visual, 56:36] Text “AQ-SAP” [Visual, 56:39] USD(A&S) seal [Visual, 56:46] Satellite orbiting Earth [Narrator, 56:46] And for more context, I do highly recommend viewing my NRO project, which talks much more about this 1994 reorganization and Bill Perry. [Visual, 56:52] Text “NRO NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE” [Visual, 56:55] Admiral Wilson on television screen [Narrator, 56:55] Well, within the Wilson Davis Notes, the USD(A&S)‘s former title, the USD(A&T) or OUSD(A&T), Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, is cited as one of the critical offices housing UFO legacy activity information post-1994 Bill Perry SAP reorganization. [Visual, 56:58] Title diagram USD(A&S) → USD(A&T) → USD(AT&L) [Visual, 57:05] Excerpt of EWD notes page [Visual, 57:14] Photo of Air Force General H. Marshall Ward alongside document page [Narrator, 57:14] Indeed, allegedly, it was Air Force General H. Marshall Ward, who served as former director of SAPCO, or the Special Access Program Central Office in the DoD, former executive secretary of the Special Access Program Oversight Committee, or SAPOC, and former director of special programs within the modern-day term USD(A&S), [Visual, 57:16] Title “MARSHAL WARD / WILKINSON MEETING - 1990s” [Visual, 57:34] Excerpt of EWD Notes text showing General Ward reference [Narrator, 57:34] that outright told Admiral Wilson this special subset of the unacknowledged, carve-outs, waived programs containing information on the legacy programs was housed within then-USD(A&T), now USD(A&S). [Visual, 57:48] Figures in hazmat suits with flashlights investigating crashed UFO [Narrator, 57:48] The important thing here is Wilson allegedly found this unusual record group within the USD(A&T), now USD(A&S), and read the index abstracts. [Visual, 57:52] On-screen subtitle text “TW: So found the unusual record group…” [Visual, 58:00] Numbers vertically spinning [Narrator, 58:00] The program record contained zero budget info. Such information was kept in separate records for audit purposes. [Visual, 58:05] EWD Notes text excerpt: “TW: No budget info…” [Visual, 58:09] Black triangle UFO in flight [Narrator, 58:09] And please, please remember this. The fact there was no budget info here is probably the most critical piece of the entire Wilson Davis Notes, and one of the most consequential pieces to this document that gives the document authenticity to me. [Visual, 58:12] Spread of hundred-dollar bills [Visual, 58:20] Richard Dolan speaking on a podcast [Narrator, 58:26] Please remember that in 1997, Wilson found the UFO legacy program portfolio record had zero budget info. [Visual, 58:27] Admiral Wilson speaking at podium [Visual, 58:36] Paul Kaminski sitting in auditorium [Narrator, 58:36] The USD(A&T) at the time of Wilson’s conquest was one Mr. Paul Kaminski, [Visual, 58:37] Subtitle of EWD Notes text [Visual, 58:41] Paul Kaminski at podium [Narrator, 58:41] a man whom I have direct knowledge was indeed a very senior individual within the UFO legacy program portfolio. [Visual, 58:48] Paul Kaminski in blue chairs [Narrator, 58:48] Kaminski additionally served as a senior member of the SAPOC and, more present day, on the board of Mitre. [Visual, 58:53] Text “MITRE | SPACE” [Visual, 58:56] USD(A&S) seal [Narrator, 58:56] Indeed, I wager the modern-day USD(A&S), who maintains oversight of acquisition SAPs, and according to Wilson’s alleged disclosures, [Visual, 59:02] Admiral Wilson speaking at hearing [Narrator, 59:05] has in the past housed records for the UFO legacy program portfolio, is absolutely critical to covert UFO operations, alongside the USD(R&E), Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, which is the evolution of Vannevar Bush’s Research and Development Board, RDB, as well as USD(I&S), Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, Lieutenant General James Clapper’s previous role. [Visual, 59:07] UFO in hangar [Visual, 59:10] Night-vision clip of helicopter landing [Visual, 59:15] Seal of USD(R&E) [Visual, 59:19] Historical footage of two men talking [Visual, 59:21] Close-up of Vannevar Bush [Visual, 59:24] James Clapper photo with USD(I) seal [Visual, 59:31] Green static glitch [Visual, 59:32] Edward Aldridge speaking at hearing [Narrator, 59:32] High-level acquisition directors, offices, and functions have been highlighted again and again in my work as being imperative to the UFO legacy program structure. [Visual, 59:42] Control tower at sunset [Visual, 59:44] SAF/AQ organizational chart [Narrator, 59:42] Indeed, I spent hours discussing SAF/AQ, or Air Force Acquisition, managed by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, [Visual, 59:52] Silhouette of airplane cockpit [Visual, 59:53] C-130 aircraft parked on tarmac [Narrator, 59:53] and three components within SAF/AQ: SAF/AQR, Science, Technology, and Engineering, SAF/AQX, Acquisition… [Visual, 59:55] Organizational chart “THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (ACQUISITION) (SAF/AQ)” [Visual, 1:00:00] Organogram diagram of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition) [Narrator, 1:00:00] SAF/AQX, Acquisition Integration, and SAF/AQL, Special Programs, [Visual, 1:00:04] 3D model of the dome-shaped craft in a lab [Narrator, 1:00:04] as being critical elements to the Air Force’s Hidden Wing program. [Visual, 1:00:08] B&W animation of the dome craft next to a human silhouette [Narrator, 1:00:09] The Hidden Wing centers on T&E, or Test and Evaluation, of alien reproduction vehicles, derivative airframes, and the occasional NHI craft. [Visual, 1:00:15] Three white spheres floating in a hangar behind “TEST & EVALUATION” text [Visual, 1:00:19] Opening camera aperture transition to a rocket launchpad at night [Narrator, 1:00:19] I’ve additionally spoken on the importance of NRO acquisitions in the context of covert UFO activities. [Visual, 1:00:25] Rocket blueprint followed by aerial shot of the Capitol dome with the National Reconnaissance Office seal [Narrator, 1:00:26] NRO acquisitions are joint-run by the DDNI (AT&F), or Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Acquisition, Technology and Facilities, [Visual, 1:00:29] White arrow pointing to “DDNI (AT&F)” over the NRO seal [Visual, 1:00:36] White arrow pointing to “USD (A&S)” over the NRO seal [Narrator, 1:00:36] and, you guessed it, the USD (A&S). [Visual, 1:00:39] Glitch transition to interview of an elderly man in front of an “HRL LABORATORIES” screen [Narrator, 1:00:40] We’ve already talked plenty about USD (A&S). [Visual, 1:00:43] Central Intelligence Agency floor seal [Narrator, 1:00:43] But I am shocked at just how many agency spook legacy gatekeepers have also served within the DDNI (AT&F). [Visual, 1:00:52] Doug Wolfe speaking at “data + Hadoop WORLD” conference [Narrator, 1:00:52] These include Doug Wolfe [Visual, 1:00:53] Dawn Meyerreicks gesturing in front of a CIA logo [Narrator, 1:00:54] and Dawn Meyerreicks, [Narrator, 1:00:55] both of whom also served as Deputy Director for the CIA’s Directorate of Science and Technology. [Visual, 1:00:58] Directorate of Science and Technology logo [Visual, 1:01:02] Doug Wolfe speaking on stage [Narrator, 1:01:02] Doug Wolfe is a very bad man. [Visual, 1:01:05] Saturn graphic transition [Visual, 1:01:06] Aerial shot of the Pentagon with a diagram of “SAP TYPES” [Narrator, 1:01:06] Okay, let’s finally loop back to the three types of SAPs: Acquisition, Intelligence, and Operations and Support SAPs. [Visual, 1:01:15] Zooming in on “INTELLIGENCE” on the Pentagon diagram [Narrator, 1:01:15] Intelligence SAPs safeguard the execution and planning of sensitive intelligence and counterintelligence operations. [Visual, 1:01:21] DoD Directive 5205.07 document overlaid with Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence seal [Narrator, 1:01:22] Intelligence SAPs, as you can probably guess, are overseen by the USD (I&S), Intelligence and Security. [Visual, 1:01:29] Close-up of James Clapper [Narrator, 1:01:30] Again, former USD (I&S) Lieutenant General James Clapper [Visual, 1:01:32] James Clapper interview in a living room [Narrator, 1:01:33] served as the closest thing to a Dick Cheney-level UFO legacy program mafioso [Visual, 1:01:39] James Clapper speaking at a podium [Narrator, 1:01:40] whilst he was DNI from 2010 to 2017, where he previously served as USD (I&S) from 2007 to 2010. [Visual, 1:01:49] Glitch transition to a younger man in a blue suit speaking [Narrator, 1:01:50] I am going to say something rather controversial here, which we will expand on later. But with extreme confidence, I will go out on a limb here and state that the AATIP, [Visual, 1:01:58] Red graphic title card: “ADVANCED AEROSPACE THREAT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM” [Narrator, 1:01:58] the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, [Visual, 1:02:03] Presidential Seal of the United States [Narrator, 1:02:04] a cover project for several National Security Council activities, [Visual, 1:02:07] James Clapper walking with President Barack Obama [Narrator, 1:02:08] operated as a Clapper-given cover when he was USD (I&S) onto DNI [Visual, 1:02:14] James Clapper interview in the living room [Narrator, 1:02:14] as a system to, quote-unquote, “talk about the onion outside of the onion.” [Visual, 1:02:16] Extreme close-up of a sliced red onion [Visual, 1:02:18] Hillary Clinton smiling and gesturing on stage [Narrator, 1:02:19] The motives for Clapper pushing for partial transparency on UFOs are unknown, but I highly wager [Visual, 1:02:24] Evening view of the Washington Monument and the Capitol dome [Narrator, 1:02:26] the fake AATIP program was partially a cover for National Security Council Intelligence SAPs. [Visual, 1:02:32] Luis Elizondo walking outside [Narrator, 1:02:33] And who better to spearhead this job than Luis Elizondo, [Visual, 1:02:35] Luis Elizondo walking near a body of water with the Washington Monument in the background [Narrator, 1:02:36] who from 2013 to 2017 [Visual, 1:02:39] Luis Elizondo interview on NewsNation [Narrator, 1:02:40] served as Director for the National Programs Special Management Staff, or NPMS. [Visual, 1:02:45] Resignation memorandum document [Narrator, 1:02:46] The USD (I&S) NPMS, or again, National Program Special Management Staff Director, [Visual, 1:02:49] Close-up of Luis Elizondo’s signature inside a glass orb [Visual, 1:02:51] Aerial view of Washington D.C. showing the Pentagon with a coordination flow diagram [Narrator, 1:02:52] runs coordination between National Security Council SAPs and the US Department of Defense/Intelligence Community. [Visual, 1:03:00] An F-117 stealth aircraft parked at sunset [Narrator, 1:03:01] The Director of NPMS is one of the most critical jobs in the entirety of the United States that most people have never even heard of. [Visual, 1:03:10] High-altitude view zooming in on the Pentagon [Narrator, 1:03:10] The Director of NPMS is usually the most cleared person in the entire DoD besides the Secretary of Defense themselves, [Visual, 1:03:19] Zooming in on the Pentagon with text overlay: “DIRECTOR NPMS MORE CLEARED THAN DIRECTOR DOD SAPCO” [Narrator, 1:03:20] indeed, more cleared than the DoD Special Access Program Central Office Director. [Visual, 1:03:25] Luis Elizondo interview on NewsNation [Narrator, 1:03:25] So when I say Lou tangoed with the legacy architecture far more than he has ever let on, [Visual, 1:03:31] Luis Elizondo walking on a sidewalk near the US Capitol [Narrator, 1:03:32] understand the extreme consequences and importance of his former position as Director of the National Programs Special Management Staff. [Visual, 1:03:33] Close-up of Luis Elizondo’s arms crossed [Visual, 1:03:41] Blue digital display: “ERROR - SIGNAL” [Visual, 1:03:42] Small American flag sticker on a metallic surface [Narrator, 1:03:42] Now throughout this project, we’ve been talking a lot about elements and offices within the Secretary of Defense. [Visual, 1:03:45] Blue glowing seal of the Department of Defense [Narrator, 1:03:48] Just recall here that all three elements of the Office of the Secretary of Defense [Visual, 1:03:49] Bullet list of USD offices on the left of the screen [Narrator, 1:03:52] I frequently accuse of being imperative to the UFO legacy program effort [Visual, 1:03:54] Stealth drone inside a hangar [Visual, 1:03:57] Bullet list of SAP structures on the right of the screen [Narrator, 1:03:57] are also paramount to SAP structure: [Visual, 1:04:00] Department of Defense seal orbiting the Earth in space [Narrator, 1:04:01] USD (A&S), which spearheads oversight for DoD Acquisition SAPs; [Visual, 1:04:06] Department of Defense seal against a blue digital map of the Earth [Narrator, 1:04:06] USD (I&S), which spearheads oversight of Intelligence SAPs; [Visual, 1:04:11] Cockpit dashboard dial gauge [Narrator, 1:04:11] and USD (R&E), the evolution of Vannevar Bush’s Research and Development Board, RDB, [Visual, 1:04:12] Black and white photograph of Vannevar Bush [Narrator, 1:04:17] which, according to DoDI 5205.11, quotes, [Visual, 1:04:17] Document titled “DoD Instruction 5205.11” [Visual, 1:04:21] Page 2 of DoDI 5205.11 with yellow highlight [Narrator, 1:04:21] “identifies and cultivates cutting-edge technology development, technology transition, developmental prototyping, experimentation, and developmental testing activities, and programs requiring SAP protection to ensure continued US warfighter advantage,” end quotes. [Visual, 1:04:39] Night view of the illuminated US Capitol dome [Narrator, 1:04:39] I highlight this here to once again say the US government really isn’t that smart. [Visual, 1:04:45] Rapid succession of intelligence and military agency logos [Narrator, 1:04:45] The infrastructure that has the cognizant authority, operational capacity, expressed mission, etc., to operate within UFO RDT&E programs [Visual, 1:04:51] Large disc-shaped craft in a dark hangar [Narrator, 1:04:54] are more often than not the exact offices you’d expect, [Visual, 1:04:55] A different shot of the hangar with the disc-shaped craft [Narrator, 1:05:00] albeit in a shadow, dual-hatted capacity. [Visual, 1:05:01] Looking out of the hangar doors at sunset [Visual, 1:05:04] White screen transition [Visual, 1:05:05] Aerial view of the Pentagon with diagram of “SAP TYPES”, highlighting “OPERATIONS & SUPPORT” [Narrator, 1:05:05] Lastly here, Operations and Support SAPs, or OS SAPs, quote, [Visual, 1:05:09] Zooming in on “OPERATIONS & SUPPORT” on the Pentagon diagram with text overlay [Narrator, 1:05:10] “protect the planning, execution, and logistical support of sensitive military operations, often involving tactical or strategic activities where operational details must remain obscured to preserve surprise or deny adversaries insight into US force capabilities,” end quotes. [Visual, 1:05:27] Wide aerial view of the Pentagon [Visual, 1:05:29] Black screen [Visual, 1:05:30] Close-up of the dome craft with text overlay of SAP types [Narrator, 1:05:30] So let’s give an example on how all three SAP types would fit into a UFO legacy program activity. [Visual, 1:05:36] Map of California highlighted in blue, with label “California, 412th Test Wing” [Narrator, 1:05:36] Let’s say we are out on the western ranges, Edwards’ 412th Test Wing specifically, within the Air Force Test Center, AFTC, to operate on the Hidden Wing program. [Visual, 1:05:42] Seal of “AD INEXPLORATA” [Visual, 1:05:44] B-2 bomber inside hangar at sunset [Visual, 1:05:48] Black triangular craft flying in a cloud vortex [Narrator, 1:05:48] We have a triangular airframe whose electrogravitic propulsion system and cloaking capabilities were derived from a non-human technical vehicle that was recovered in the American Southwest. [Visual, 1:05:50] Triangular craft with text overlays [Visual, 1:05:58] Small American flag sticker on metal [Visual, 1:06:00] 3D model of the dome craft in a lab [Narrator, 1:06:00] The development of such a craft, likely down at GOCO Air Force Plant 42, would be protected under an acquisition SAP. [Visual, 1:06:02] Facility viewed through a fence, followed by a warning sign [Visual, 1:06:06] The triangular craft with text overlay: “ACQUISITION SAP” [Visual, 1:06:10] Triangular craft flying in the sky [Narrator, 1:06:10] Once this triangle is operational and fielded for covert ISR missions, protection of these missions would be protected by an operations and support SAP. [Visual, 1:06:14] Spherical object flying in the sky [Visual, 1:06:15] Triangular craft in a white vortex, with text overlay: “OPERATIONS & SUPPORT SAP” [Visual, 1:06:20] Earth view from space [Narrator, 1:06:20] The sources and methods that justified the craft in the first place, recover non-human technology that was deemed to be exploitable, would be protected by an intelligence SAP. [Visual, 1:06:21] Satellite orbiting the Earth [Visual, 1:06:23] Re-entry capsule [Visual, 1:06:24] The dome craft in a hangar with text overlay “INTELLIGENCE SAP” [Visual, 1:06:28] Hangar doors opening in the desert, text overlay: “INTELLIGENCE SAP” [Visual, 1:06:31] Orange triangular craft flying at sunset with text overlay [Narrator, 1:06:31] For our Hidden Wing electrogravitic triangle, acquisition SAPs protect how the craft is built, OS SAPs protect how and where it’s used, and intelligence SAPs protect how we know what we know. [Visual, 1:06:45] Text glitch transition [Visual, 1:06:46] Green code lines on a black screen [Visual, 1:06:47] Aerial shot of the Pentagon with text overlay: “SAP PROTECTION LEVELS” [Narrator, 1:06:47] Okay, now is where we must get ultra-specific to speak on the protection levels of SAPs: acknowledged, unacknowledged, and waived. [Visual, 1:06:52] Bullet list of SAP protection levels on Pentagon diagram [Visual, 1:06:56] Glitch transition back to the younger man in a brown hoodie speaking [Narrator, 1:06:57] You will hear me often speak on WU-SAPs, or waived unacknowledged special access programs, as the container for UFO legacy activities, as these are the apex of secrecy for SAPs. [Visual, 1:06:58] Text overlay of WU SAP terms [Visual, 1:07:01] Dome craft flying in a white vortex [Visual, 1:07:08] Glitch transition [Visual, 1:07:09] Night view of the US Capitol dome [Narrator, 1:07:09] Although all SAPs are closely guarded national programs, there are SAPs whose very existence is a core secret and thus more closely guarded with enhanced protection levels. [Visual, 1:07:15] Dark industrial room [Visual, 1:07:21] F-35 fighter jet flying with text overlay: “ACKNOWLEDGED SAP” [Narrator, 1:07:21] An acknowledged SAP’s existence can be openly recognized, although details of the program such as materials and techniques remain classified. [Visual, 1:07:24] Cockpit camera view [Visual, 1:07:27] Pilot view banking over land [Visual, 1:07:29] Background of hundred-dollar bills, with text box on acknowledged SAPs [Narrator, 1:07:29] The funding for such acknowledged SAPs is often unclassified. [Visual, 1:07:35] Aerial view of the Capitol building [Narrator, 1:07:35] Acknowledged SAPs undergo full reporting to Congressional defense and intelligence committees, essentially broad SAP oversight, while still retaining need-to-know access for clear program personnel. [Visual, 1:07:41] Industrial facility structures [Visual, 1:07:42] Robotic arm working [Visual, 1:07:43] Aircraft sensor turret rotating [Visual, 1:07:44] B-2 bomber taxiing [Visual, 1:07:47] Glitch transition [Visual, 1:07:48] Hangar interior with two B-2 bombers, text overlay: “UNACKNOWLEDGED SAP” [Narrator, 1:07:48] On the other hand, unacknowledged SAPs, or U-SAPs, are even more closely guarded secrets, with the mere existence and purpose of the U-SAP being protected. [Visual, 1:07:56] Pickup truck driving in front of B-2 bomber inside hangar [Visual, 1:07:58] Stealth drone flying in clouds, with text box on unacknowledged SAPs [Narrator, 1:07:58] Indeed, U-SAP program funding is often classified, unacknowledged, hidden within the federal budget, or not directly linked to the program. [Visual, 1:08:08] Soldiers in hazmat suits and gas masks dressing [Narrator, 1:08:08] U-SAPs are built to conceal program existence from all unauthorized individuals, including most US government officials and congressional committees. [Visual, 1:08:16] Glitch transition [Visual, 1:08:17] F-35 jet inside hangar [Narrator, 1:08:17] For U-SAPs, need-to-know access far transcends traditional SAPs, with cleared personnel often requiring additional indoctrination beyond top secret clearance with sensitive compartmented information, or TS/SCI. [Visual, 1:08:18] Silhouette of three people in front of security center screen [Visual, 1:08:20] Close-up of F-35 pilot [Visual, 1:08:21] F-35 takeoff from carrier with yellow-jacket crew, with text overlay: “GREATER PROGRAM INDOCTRINATION THAN STANDARD TS/SCI” [Visual, 1:08:24] Radar display graphics [Visual, 1:08:26] Blue triangles over military ship graphics [Visual, 1:08:27] Code screen [Visual, 1:08:28] Sikorsky Raider helicopter flying [Visual, 1:08:32] Glitch transition to book pages with yellow text: “YELLOW FRUIT” [Narrator, 1:08:32] Yellow Fruit, as we discussed in part one of this project, was indeed a U-SAP, with a possible waived status. [Visual, 1:08:39] Highlighted text in the book starting with: “The top Army leadership…” [Narrator, 1:08:39] Recall how Army Chief of Staff John Wickham at the time claimed he was never briefed about the black operations run by the Army Special Operations Division, SOD. [Visual, 1:08:49] Glitch transition [Visual, 1:08:50] Title page of 1994 Joint Security Commission report: “REDEFINING SECURITY” [Narrator, 1:08:50] According to the Joint Security Commission’s 1994 report titled “Redefining Security,” unacknowledged SAPs run roughly three to ten times the security costs of acknowledged SAPs. [Visual, 1:08:55] Highlighted pages from the report “REDEFINING SECURITY” [Visual, 1:09:03] Glitch transition [Visual, 1:09:04] Close-up of highlighted text from the report [Narrator, 1:09:04] Indeed, the report states that estimated security costs for U-SAPs can be as high as 40 percent of total operating costs for unacknowledged programs. [Visual, 1:09:14] Glitch transition to elderly man with glasses speaking [Narrator, 1:09:14] This may initially seem at odds with what’s presented in the Wilson Davis notes, where Wilson states that General Mike Kostelnik stated the security budget for the legacy activities hidden within a special subset of unacknowledged carve-out waived national programs was two to three times the actual program budget, but in the past reached as high as six to seven times the program budget. [Visual, 1:09:16] Wilson-Davis notes document scrolling on the left [Visual, 1:09:19] NASA C-SPAN footage with Wilson-Davis notes overlayed on the left [Visual, 1:09:37] Glitch transition to the younger man in the blue suit [Narrator, 1:09:38] But coming up soon, I’m actually going to make a counter-argument that we will expand on and state that this comment allegedly by Kostelnik makes perfect sense. [Visual, 1:09:40] Text box overlay from Wilson-Davis notes [Visual, 1:09:47] Yellow highlights over Wilson-Davis notes page [Narrator, 1:09:48] Recall how the legacy program records within the OUSDAT, now USD (A&S), contained zero budget info. [Visual, 1:09:55] Presidential Seal of the United States with text overlay: “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL LOOPHOLE” [Narrator, 1:09:55] There is a very specific loophole that National Security Council spearheaded… [Visual, 1:10:00] Title screen showing “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL LOOPHOLE” over the presidential seal. [Narrator, 1:10:00] programs, have enjoyed to waive budgetary and further reporting requirements. [Visual, 1:10:01] Text “BUDGETARY/REPORTING REQUIREMENTS” appears, crossed out in red. [Visual, 1:10:05] Text “MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS” appears under the title with Capitol Hill in the background. [Narrator, 1:10:05] in conjunction with myriad funding schemes, including misappropriation of funds, haircuts across multiple programs, and self-fund. [Visual, 1:10:13] Close-up of a tape reel spinning. [Narrator, 1:10:13] Put a pin in this budget topic once more. We will return to this most crucial topic soon. [Visual, 1:10:19] Digital glitch transition. [Visual, 1:10:20] Tech blueprint diagram of a rocket structure. [Narrator, 1:10:20] A secrecy layer even deeper is the final protection level of SAPs, waived. [Visual, 1:10:25] Rocket launch with text overlay “WAIVED SAP” and a document definition of Waived SAPs. [Narrator, 1:10:26] Waived, unacknowledged programs are created under extremely limited circumstances. [Visual, 1:10:32] A satellite orbiting Earth. [Narrator, 1:10:33] Waived programs have significantly more restrictive reporting requirements and access controls, literally waiving or getting rid of SAP reporting requirements detailed in Section 119, Title 10, U.S. Code. [Visual, 1:10:46] Globe wireframe graphic. [Visual, 1:10:47] White text “W/USAP” appears in front of the digital globe. [Narrator, 1:10:47] Woo-saps as we call them, have far more strict carve-out and reporting requirements than even You-saps. [Visual, 1:10:54] Document page “But What About Those Waived-Unacknowledged SAPs?” with highlighted text. [Narrator, 1:10:54] According to the War Zone and DOD Directive 5205.07, the Access Approval Authority for Woo-saps consists solely of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, special Under Secretaries of Defense, or an amorphous component head with, quote, “cognizant authority”. [Visual, 1:11:12] DoD Instruction 5205.11 document page titled “MANAGEMENT, ADMINISTRATION, AND OVERSIGHT OF DoD SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM”. [Narrator, 1:11:12] Waived programs here are still supposed to be reported to the Congressional Gang of Eight, which includes the majority and minority leaders of the House and Senate, and chairs and ranking members of the intelligence committees. [Visual, 1:11:17] Cover of “STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE 3 COVERT ACTION” book and text page with yellow highlighting. [Visual, 1:11:24] Capitol dome at sunset. [Narrator, 1:11:24] But alas, we will discuss loopholes that waives even this reporting requirement, as the Gang of Eight has clearly not been briefed on the legacy portfolio. [Visual, 1:11:34] David Grusch speaking with headphones in front of a red curtain. [David Grusch, 1:11:34] And I met with Senator Harry Reid, but nine months before he died. And, of course, he’s a private citizen now, and I wanted to brief him on the topic, and I wanted to get his kind of thought leadership on it because, you know, he was a Gang of Eight member, right? You know, which is the top, most cleared senators and congressmen. He was the majority leader, for God’s sake, of the Senate. And I knew, you know, he helped sponsor the AAWSAP program that I mentioned, and where they looked at Skinwalker Ranch and some other things. And I wanted to understand like what does Harry Reid actually know, like why did he, you know, give 21 million dollars to DIA and Bigelow Aerospace for this? So, I’m sitting there in Harry Reid’s living room, you know, right next to him, with some other witnesses that were there with me, and he straight up says, he’s like, “Yeah, I knew we had UFO material, I was denied access for decades.” [Visual, 1:12:31] Earth from space with text overlay “TS//SAR-PID//NOFORN”. [Narrator, 1:12:31] And just like the NOFORN, or Not Releasable to Foreign National control marker, a waived, unacknowledged SAP can also feature the informal control marker of Bigoted. And I cannot think of anyone to explain this better than David Grusch. So, let’s expand on what he said in the intro. [Visual, 1:12:42] Text overlay “BIGOTED” appears below “TS//SAR-PID//NOFORN”. [Visual, 1:12:43] David Grusch in an office, speaking. [Visual, 1:12:50] David Grusch speaking with headphones in front of a red curtain. [David Grusch, 1:12:50] One of the most serious SAPs you can ask for, what they call a bigoted, waived, special access program. So waived means it’s limited congressional reporting, um, that is a class of special access programs. And bigoted means it’s like by name… [Visual, 1:13:06] Glitch transition. [Visual, 1:13:07] David Grusch in an office speaking. [David Grusch, 1:13:07] You have to remember, so, here’s one of the loopholes they use, right? So, there’s, there’s White House Special Access Programs. Uh, there is something called covert access programs, 50 U.S. Code 3093, those are the programs reported to the Gang of Eight, Gang of Four, you know, that’s like assassination stuff, etc., you know, other things the government doesn’t acknowledge. But there is a, you know, a way to develop a White House SAP that is non-covert action, you know, White House Special Access Program. If you look in the law, there are no reporting carve-outs or requirements to tell like the Speaker or the majority leader or anything like that. [Visual, 1:13:45] Aerial view of the Pentagon. [Narrator, 1:13:45] Okay, we have really started to dive into oversight and authority of SAPs, and like David Grusch has stated, UFO legacy activity national programs are structured in such a way to even avoid waived bigoted reporting. [Visual, 1:13:49] David Grusch walking into a room with flashing cameras. [Visual, 1:13:51] Black triangle shape inside a white sphere. [Visual, 1:13:59] Close-up of a tape deck button “REW” being pressed. [Narrator, 1:13:59] So, before we discuss those loopholes I mentioned earlier, let’s first briefly discuss the SAP oversight and governance structure in more detail. [Visual, 1:14:02] Document pages showing DoD Directive 5205.07. [Visual, 1:14:07] Moving up metal steps. [Visual, 1:14:14] Graphic of a neural network with text overlay “SAP ENTERPRISE”. [Narrator, 1:14:08] Because indeed, if elements of covert UFO programs operate within SAPs, which I will put any amount of money on that they do, surely special access programs must have an internal system of governance and gatekeeping to maintain total secrecy and make unauthorized access to the program portfolio impossible. [Visual, 1:14:21] American flag sticker reflected on metallic surface. [Visual, 1:14:28] Document page showing Section 119 “Special access programs: congressional oversight”. [Narrator, 1:14:28] Title 10 U.S. Code 119 outlines reporting requirements for SAPs. [Visual, 1:14:33] Ronald Reagan speaking at a podium. [Narrator, 1:14:33] And funny enough, such strict oversight actually arose from the Yellow Fruit fiasco in 1983, as we discussed in part one. [Visual, 1:14:40] Capitol dome with text “10 U.S. CODE § 119” crossed out in red. [Visual, 1:14:44] Tunnel/hangar entrance in dry landscape. [Narrator, 1:14:40] But such discussion is trivial at best because, as we know, UFO legacy programs are not reported to congressional elements, bar a few Congress people here and there on the payroll of legacy programs. Mike Turner is likely one of these thug enforcers. [Visual, 1:14:48] CBS interview clip with Representative Mike Turner. [Visual, 1:14:57] Glitch lines transition. [Visual, 1:14:58] Document page showing “Table 1. AAAs” from DoDI 5205.11. [Narrator, 1:14:58] Internal SAP governance is broken up into several clearly defined roles and layers to ensure the SAP enterprise runs smoothly, maintains appropriate access, and enforces security protocols. [Visual, 1:15:10] Pentagon aerial view. [Visual, 1:15:11] Pentagon view with labels pointing to SAPOC, SRG, and SAPCO. [Narrator, 1:15:11] The SAP governance structure is top-down comprised of the SAPOC, SRG, and SAPCO. And the SAP governance process relies upon personnel making the determination that the need for a SAP exists. [Visual, 1:15:25] Checkbox list with “COMPONENT SAPCO” selected. [Narrator, 1:15:25] The lowest rung of the totem pole here is component-level Special Access Program Central Offices, or SAPCOs. [Visual, 1:15:28] Document page “2. Component-Level SAP Central Office”. [Visual, 1:15:32] Gray Navy drone flying over water. [Visual, 1:15:33] Overlaid military branch seals. [Narrator, 1:15:33] Each branch of the armed forces, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, DARPA, and the Missile Defense Agency possess a component-level SAPCO, which is responsible for all SAPs under their purview. [Visual, 1:15:35] Joint Chiefs of Staff seal overlay. [Visual, 1:15:36] DARPA logo overlay. [Visual, 1:15:37] Missile Defense Agency seal overlay. [Visual, 1:15:44] Audio spectrum graphic. [Visual, 1:15:47] Two F-35 fighter jets flying. [Narrator, 1:15:45] This here is a bit of a quandary. I am aware of individuals within component-level SAPCOs, like William E. MacLure of the Air Force’s SAF/AAZ, or the Director of Security, Special Programs Oversight and Information Protection, who they and their offices operate key positions in legacy activity architecture. [Visual, 1:15:51] Portrait of William E. MacLure with text “AAZ SAF”. [Visual, 1:16:00] Saucer UFO 3D model with silhouette. [Visual, 1:16:06] Triangular UFO flying at night. [Narrator, 1:16:06] But I am also aware of instances in which component-level SAPCOs are bypassed by the legacy programs, like when Edward C. Aldridge stuffed likely Joint Air Force and NRO activities, called, quote, “outside activities” under SAF/AA, bypassing the AAZ I just mentioned. [Visual, 1:16:13] Portrait of Edward C. Aldridge with document pages. [Visual, 1:16:25] Saucer UFO in grass at night. [Narrator, 1:16:25] I believe the determination on if a component-level SAPCO is read into legacy activities depends completely on the director and their history in the programs. [Visual, 1:16:36] Glitch transition. [Visual, 1:16:37] Checkbox list with “OSD SAPCO” selected. [Narrator, 1:16:37] Above component-level SAPCO sit OSD, or Office of the Secretary of Defense level SAPCOs. [Visual, 1:16:40] Document page “3. OSD-Level SAP Central Office”. [Visual, 1:16:43] Pentagon with seals for USD(I&S), USD(A&S), and USD(R&E). [Narrator, 1:16:43] We discussed this in relation to USD(I&S), USD(A&S), and USD(R&E) earlier. [Visual, 1:16:50] Washington D.C. skyline at sunset with checkbox list. [Narrator, 1:16:50] Above OSD SAPCO sits DoD SAPCO, whose director has often historically been the USD(A&S). [Visual, 1:16:52] Document page “1. DoD SAP Central Office”. [Visual, 1:16:56] USD(A&S) seal overlay. [Visual, 1:16:59] Military compilation cuts. [Narrator, 1:16:59] Former directors of DoD SAPCO that have almost certainly been legacy program personnel include General Dawn Dunlap and General H. Marshall Ward. [Visual, 1:17:04] Portrait of General Dawn Dunlap. [Visual, 1:17:06] Portraits of General Dawn Dunlap and General H. Marshall Ward. [Visual, 1:17:09] Document page “THE SAPCO”. [Narrator, 1:17:09] DoD SAPCO serves as the primary staff support to something called the SAPOC. [Visual, 1:17:15] Donald Trump speaking at a podium. [Narrator, 1:17:15] The SAP Central Office also serves as the primary point of contact with Congress, the National Security Council, and other government agencies/services. [Visual, 1:17:26] Podcast studio with host speaking. [Narrator, 1:17:26] So yeah, I bet I know what you’re thinking here. The SAPCO and SAPOC above it, which we will speak on momentarily here, are two of the critical gatekeeping fixtures within the SAP enterprise that get to decide who and what services access the legacy program portfolio. [Visual, 1:17:29] Text “SAPCO” appears. [Visual, 1:17:34] American flag reflection with text “SAPOC SAPCO”. [Visual, 1:17:44] DoDI 5205.11 Section 7 page. [Narrator, 1:17:44] The DoD SAPCO is supposed to complete PAR, or Program Access Requests, and facilitate general access for Congress requiring access to a SAP. [Visual, 1:17:54] Capitol dome. [Narrator, 1:17:54] However, just as we discussed the amorphous access approval authority behind waived SAPs, the DoD SAPCO makes a staunch exemption to this congressional access for waived SAPs and waived subcomponents. [Visual, 1:17:59] Document Section 7.2. [Visual, 1:18:07] Glitch transition. [Visual, 1:18:08] Hangar with saucer UFO, checkbox list shows “SAPOC”. [Narrator, 1:18:08] But moving up the totem pole, let’s now focus on the real meat and potatoes. [Visual, 1:18:13] Document “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE INFORMATION BULLETIN”. [Narrator, 1:18:13] The established in 1994, Special Access Program Oversight Committee, or SAPOC, chaired by the Deputy Secretary of Defense, like John M. Deutch and Bill Perry. [Visual, 1:18:24] Pilot walking in front of an aircraft, document “SAPOC FUNCTIONS”. [Narrator, 1:18:24] SAPOC has access to all DoD SAPs to provide DoD-wide departmental oversight and management, and was built to, quote, “ensure compliance with law, regulations, policies, and procedures, and ensure required information is provided to the Congress,” end quote. [Visual, 1:18:41] Pentagon aerial view with “SAPOC” pointing to “WAIVED SAPS”. [Narrator, 1:18:41] SAPOC has oversight over all waived DoD SAPs to determine if there is a continued need for waived status. [Visual, 1:18:50] Circuit graphic, checkbox list shows “SAPOC SRG”. [Narrator, 1:18:50] SAPOC is supported by the SRG, or Senior Review Group, which is really the apex of our totem pole here. [Visual, 1:18:52] Radar dishes array. [Visual, 1:18:57] Document “THE SRG”. [Narrator, 1:18:57] To learn more about many individuals within SAPOC and SRG, like Mike Kostelnik, Lynn Wells, Paul Kaminski, etc., I do highly recommend referencing my NRO project, but I want to focus more on the structure here. [Visual, 1:19:05] Title “NRO NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE”. [Visual, 1:19:11] Document “4. Senior Review Group (SRG)“. [Narrator, 1:19:11] SRG, again, Senior Review Group, is comprised of a cadre of senior executive service-level individuals to operate as the principal support to the SAPOC, and ensure SAPs aren’t duplicated across various SAP categories. [Visual, 1:19:26] David Grusch at congressional hearing. [Narrator, 1:19:26] Hmm. Senior executive officials. I wonder what kind of people Dave Grusch had said serve as gatekeepers for the legacy apparatus. [Visual, 1:19:29] Split screen of Representative Mace and David Grusch. [Visual, 1:19:34] Representative Burchett speaking. Tag: “MR. BURCHETT”. [Representative Burchett, 1:19:34] So who gets to decide this, in your opinion, in the past? [Visual, 1:19:39] David Grusch. Tag: “Mr. Grusch”. [David Grusch, 1:19:39] Uh, it’s a group of career, uh, senior executive officials. [Representative Burchett, 1:19:44] Okay, are they government officials? [David Grusch, 1:19:47] Both in and outs. [Representative Burchett, 1:19:48] Do what? [David Grusch, 1:19:48] Both in and outs of government. And that’s about as far as… [Representative Burchett, 1:19:52] I got you. All right. Well, that’s, it leads to my next question. [Visual, 1:19:55] Admiral Thomas Wilson speaking at the Pentagon, label “SRG” appears. [Narrator, 1:19:56] Within the Wilson-Davis notes, the Senior Review Group is labeled as the… [Visual, 1:20:00] A military officer in uniform standing at a Pentagon podium. [Narrator, 1:20:00] …gatekeeping structure for the UFO portfolio, with SRG members blocking Wilson from accessing the programs. Quote: [Visual, 1:20:08] A document snippet with the heading “TW: Before last week of June (‘97)” and highlighted text: “it didn’t fall within my oversight, etc.” [Narrator, 1:20:08] “I was to immediately drop the matter and let it go—forget about it as I do not have purview over their project, it didn’t fall within my oversight, etc.” End quote. [Visual, 1:20:19] Video of Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson speaking at a C-SPAN hearing. [Narrator, 1:20:19] I vehemently agree with these statements allegedly made by Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson. [Visual, 1:20:25] A document titled “SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE INFORMATION BULLETIN - NOVEMBER 1994”. [Narrator, 1:20:25] Indeed, I am aware the SAPOC SRG, established in 1994 by then Deputy Secretary of Defense Bill Perry, was tasked, alongside its many oversight duties, to gatekeep authoritative access to the legacy program portfolio. [Visual, 1:20:39] A large concrete wall structure. [Visual, 1:20:41] A man in a blue suit speaking in an interview studio with the caption “SHORT & NARROW CHAIN OF COMMAND”. [Narrator, 1:20:41] Short and narrow chains of command, as I always say. [Visual, 1:20:45] An abstract glowing light circle animation. [Narrator, 1:20:45] You see, as I understand, after the entire Manhattan Project 2.0 schism that occurred in the 1980s with NSDD-159, EO 12356, and Yellow Fruit as we spoke on in part one, [Visual, 1:20:48] A document snippet with a red “RESTRICTED” label. [Visual, 1:20:50] Ronald Reagan speaking at a podium. [Narrator, 1:20:58] …the disclosure appetite of Clinton was the final straw for the ever-crumbling legacy structure to permanently vest itself outside of fully contained executive branch oversight. [Visual, 1:20:59] Bill Clinton speaking at a podium. [Visual, 1:21:06] A camera filming the White House seal on a screen. [Visual, 1:21:10] Three men sitting around a podcast table. [Narrator, 1:21:10] So again, as I’ve stated so many times throughout this project because this is so critical to remember. [Visual, 1:21:17] Bill Clinton speaking at a press conference with other officials. [Narrator, 1:21:17] As I understand, in 1994, legacy programs permanently transferred full oversight of the many legacy program silos to a quasi-industry and government body of slightly over two dozen people. [Visual, 1:21:20] View of a hangar bay opening to a runway. [Visual, 1:21:21] A reflection of a hangar opening on large agricultural silos. [Visual, 1:21:26] Night view of the US Capitol and Washington Monument with text “INDUSTRY / US GOV CONTROL GROUP OF 27”. [Narrator, 1:21:30] …and the SAPOC SRG was deputized as the access approval authority to gatekeep even directors of intelligence agencies and general and flag officers who did not possess relevant need-to-know from accessing the programs. [Visual, 1:21:31] The US Capitol night view with text: “SAPOC SRG - LEGACY AAA (ACCESS APPROVAL AUTHORITY)“. [Visual, 1:21:36] Close up of Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson at the C-SPAN hearing. [Visual, 1:21:45] Close up of a cassette tape rotating inside a player. [Narrator, 1:21:46] So just to be clear here, SAPOC and its SRG are the skeleton gatekeeping structure and access approval authority for USG access into the legacy programs. [Visual, 1:21:48] X-ray of a spine with diagram pointing from “USG” to “SAPOC SRG” to “UFO”. [Visual, 1:21:56] Group of military and political figures with text “SAPOC SRG” crossed out by a red “X” and an arrow pointing to “MAJ12”. [Narrator, 1:21:57] SAPOC SRG is not the bogeyman remnants of the Maj 12 or Majestic 12 entity that existed in Eisenhower’s 5412 committee special group or Nixon’s 303 committee, [Visual, 1:22:08] Older man with glasses sitting in a room with text “SAPOC SRG”. [Narrator, 1:22:08] …nor is it the stalwart titan that protects inside access to an insidious and amorphous control group that exists as a pitiful shell of a once-mighty effort. [Visual, 1:22:18] A document titled “4. Senior Review Group (SRG)“. [Narrator, 1:22:18] I additionally understand, whilst SRG is tasked to ensure there is no duplication of SAPs across the entire DoD, these actions are not taken with legacy operations. [Visual, 1:22:26] A dark hangar showing a saucer-shaped UFO object. [Narrator, 1:22:29] The UFO portfolio is so fractured and siloed, there is no way SRG can enforce program redundancies across the wider USG, like similar exploitation efforts across the army and navy, for example. [Visual, 1:22:30] A grid layout of multiple saucer-shaped spacecraft inside hangars. [Visual, 1:22:39] Multiple seals of the “Army Test and Evaluation Command” with the motto “TRUTH”. [Visual, 1:22:42] 3D rendered coins with text “Office of Naval Research”. [Visual, 1:22:44] Saturn with rings in space. [Visual, 1:22:46] The dark hangar with the saucer-shaped craft again. [Narrator, 1:22:46] The loopholes of SAPs enjoyed to further obfuscate legacy activities. This is both my favorite part of the entire video and, in my opinion, the most important. [Visual, 1:22:51] Animation of a triangular craft floating inside a glowing bubble. [Visual, 1:22:58] David Grusch speaking with framed diplomas behind him. [Narrator, 1:22:58] David Grusch’s recent Judicial Watch interview was absolutely brilliant. Like any Grusch interview, if you really listen closely and distill what Grusch is saying, there are veins of gold to mine. Let’s listen in on Grusch speaking about some of the tricks of the trade, so to speak. [David Grusch, 1:23:16] You have to remember, so, here’s one of the loopholes they use, right? So there’s White House Special Access Programs. There are something called Covert Action Programs, 50 US Code 3093. Those are the programs reported to the Gang of Eight, Gang of Four, you know, that’s like assassination stuff, etc., you know, other things the government doesn’t acknowledge. But there’s, you know, a way to develop a White House SAP that is non-covert action. You know, White House Special Access Program. If you look in the law, there are no reporting carve-outs or requirements to tell like the Speaker or the Majority Leader or anything like that. And so, that was one of the tricks of the trade: burying it over in the Department of Energy, but also keeping it in these non-covert action programs that like, you know, five people on the NSC know about, and the President at one time, and, you know, it has custodianship over across the Potomac and McLean. [Visual, 1:24:11] The dark hangar with the saucer-shaped craft and two floodlights. [Narrator, 1:24:11] Wow. Guys, this is incredibly valuable. [Visual, 1:24:14] Close up of David Grusch speaking at a congressional hearing. [Narrator, 1:24:14] Basically what David Grusch is saying here is that historically, a loophole White House/National Security Council-derived legacy operations have utilized was creating a White House-controlled Special Access Program. [Visual, 1:24:17] Night view of the US Capitol with text “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL”. [Visual, 1:24:22] Night view of the US Capitol with text “SAP”. [Visual, 1:24:24] Night view of the US Capitol with text “WHITE HOUSE SAP”. [Narrator, 1:24:27] Specifically, a non-covert action program, which completely removes any reporting and carve-out requirements. [Visual, 1:24:28] Night view of the US Capitol with text “NON-COVERT ACTION PROGRAM”. [Visual, 1:24:35] Close-up of the Seal of the President of the United States. [Narrator, 1:24:35] Let’s really break this down and see how this can be done. [Visual, 1:24:39] A document showing “TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE” Section 3093. [Narrator, 1:24:39] As Grusch stated, covert action programs are defined by 50 US Code 3093, and detail programs or activities of the US government pertaining to assassination, clandestine operations, and covert activities of which the US government does not want to acknowledge their involvement. [Visual, 1:24:57] A cassette tape player rotating. [Narrator, 1:24:57] Covert action programs feature several similarities and differences to SAPs. [Visual, 1:25:02] Aerial view of the Pentagon with text list comparing Covert Action Programs (50 USC 3093) and Special Access Programs (10 USC 119). [Narrator, 1:25:02] Both systems harness compartmentalization and security controls beyond Top Secret. Both systems are supposed to have congressional briefing channels, and both operate with third-party and cover mechanisms. [Narrator, 1:25:15] However, covert action programs and SAPs differ greatly on purpose and authority. [Visual, 1:25:22] A red circle highlighting “50 USC § 3093” on the screen. [Narrator, 1:25:22] Of course, covert action programs operate under 50 US Code 3093, and SAPs operate under Executive Order 13526 and 10 US Code Section 119. [Visual, 1:25:27] A red circle highlighting “10 USC § 119” on the screen. [Visual, 1:25:31] View of Earth from space, with text diagram of “SAP TYPES” showing “ACQUISITION”, “INTELLIGENCE”, and “OPERATIONS & SUPPORT”. [Narrator, 1:25:31] As we stated, SAPs operate under three categories: acquisition, intelligence, and operations and support, [Visual, 1:25:39] A dark background with text: “COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS”. [Narrator, 1:25:39] …while covert action programs are almost always a specific category of activity authorized under Title 50. [Narrator, 1:25:46] Although a covert action program will almost always be protected as a SAP or under SAP-like components. [Visual, 1:25:46] Under “COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” text, bullet points appear: “ALMOST ALL COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS PROTECTED BY SAP OR SAP-LIKE STRUCTURES” and “MOST SAPS ARE NOT COVERT” (crossed out). [Visual, 1:25:53] Archival photo of Dwight D. Eisenhower taking the oath of office. [Narrator, 1:25:53] Perhaps it should really come as no shock, but I argued incessantly in part one that Eisenhower relegated the UFO control group, literally once called the Maj 12, within the 5412 committee special group, which operated from 1954 to 1964. [Visual, 1:26:01] Eisenhower oath photo with text “MAJ12” overlay. [Visual, 1:26:03] Eisenhower oath photo with text “5412 COMMITTEE” overlay. [Visual, 1:26:09] Diagram showing “5412” pointing to “303”. [Narrator, 1:26:10] This control group then translated onto Nixon’s 303 committee from 1964 to 1970, then 1970 onward a bit of an unknown until about 1994. [Visual, 1:26:16] Night view of the US Capitol dome. [Visual, 1:26:20] Photo of Eisenhower’s inauguration with text: “BRIEFING DOCUMENT: OPERATION MAJESTIC 12”. [Narrator, 1:26:20] But yes, I am literally stating the Maj 12 existed within the National Security Council’s 5412 committee special group. [Visual, 1:26:30] A document passage about the NSC 5412/2 Special Group with highlighted text. [Narrator, 1:26:28] So perhaps it should come as no surprise, covert action approval was housed within the National Security Council’s subcommittee on covert action, the 5412 special group, 303 committee, and further iterations. [Visual, 1:26:40] Glitch transition back to a night view of the White House. [Narrator, 1:26:40] Because at this time, up until the mid-1970s, covert action approval was an entirely executive branch process governed by NSC activities. [Visual, 1:26:52] Night view of the Capitol building dome with text: “COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS”. [Narrator, 1:26:52] So, covert action programs are still supposed to be reported to Congress, at least the Gang of Eight or Gang of Four. [Visual, 1:26:55] A white arrow pointing down from “COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS” to text: “CONGRESS (GANG OF 8?)“. [Visual, 1:26:59] David Grusch speaking at the congressional hearing, with graphics overlay. [Narrator, 1:26:59] But David Grusch states these programs can be made non-covert, [Visual, 1:27:01] A red “X” appears over the “COVERT” part of the text, changing it to “NON-COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS”. [Visual, 1:27:04] White House briefing room screen, with text “WHITE HOUSE SAP”. [Narrator, 1:27:04] …essentially becoming a White House-controlled Special Access Program with no reporting requirements. [Visual, 1:27:06] Bullet points under “WHITE HOUSE SAP”: “WAIVED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS” and “WAIVED BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS”. [Visual, 1:27:10] The host in the studio with headphones and microphone. [Narrator, 1:27:10] And before we unpack this, I get it. Why so much discussion of the White House, National Security Council, etc.? [Visual, 1:27:18] Donald Trump speaking at a desk. [Narrator, 1:27:18] Aren’t programs held from Presidents’ administrations? [Visual, 1:27:22] A President speaking. [Narrator, 1:27:23] Yes, they are indeed. [Visual, 1:27:23] Barack Obama speaking in an interview. [Visual, 1:27:25] Black and white footage of Harry S. Truman speaking. [Narrator, 1:27:25] But the framework and very skeleton for the legacy architecture, as we discussed in part one, was formed by Truman and, more consequentially, Eisenhower. [Visual, 1:27:31] Black and white footage of Dwight D. Eisenhower speaking. [Visual, 1:27:35] Close up of a document with the stamp “TOP SECRET”. [Narrator, 1:27:35] Indeed, through a series of classified presidential executive orders, Truman and Eisenhower vested legacy program management within the National Security Council, [Visual, 1:27:39] Blurry close up of the Seal of the President. [Visual, 1:27:44] An archival photo of a sign reading “EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER”. [Narrator, 1:27:44] …with support from major elements of the US intelligence community and armed forces, [Visual, 1:27:48] Black and white video of Vannevar Bush. [Narrator, 1:27:48] …premier scientific institutions like Vannevar Bush’s Research and Development Board (RDB), [Visual, 1:27:53] Logo of the “ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” with text overlay: “GUARDIAN OF THE ATOM”. [Narrator, 1:27:53] …and Atomic Energy Commission National Laboratories. [Visual, 1:27:57] Bill Clinton and others standing at a press conference. [Narrator, 1:27:57] Over the epochs, climaxing and ending in 1994 when the programs completely wrestled the control group out of the US government into a quasi-government and industry control group, the legacy program portfolio was primarily always a White House, specifically National Security Council-run activity. [Visual, 1:28:08] A CGI rendering of a saucer-shaped UFO in a dark hangar. [Visual, 1:28:09] The Seal of the President of the United States overlaying the UFO hangar visual. [Visual, 1:28:15] Archival footage of a crowd of politicians/military officers. [Narrator, 1:28:15] So power for the legacy programs has almost always been vested in the White House, and at one time under presidential control. [Visual, 1:28:24] Close-up of a rotating saucer-shaped craft. [Narrator, 1:28:24] And that is one of the most major concerns with the legacy programs. [Visual, 1:28:29] Black and white footage of a military helicopter flying. [Narrator, 1:28:29] Sure, these activities conduct white and blue-collar crimes extensively. [Visual, 1:28:34] Night view of the US Capitol dome and Washington Monument in black and white. [Narrator, 1:28:34] But perhaps the very existence of these programs are not illegal, but protected by ironclad statute. [Visual, 1:28:43] Static transition back to the cassette player. [Visual, 1:28:44] Night scene of individuals in hazmat suits near a landed saucer UFO. [Narrator, 1:28:44] Anyways, rant here over. How are covert action programs transformed into White House-controlled SAP non-covert action programs? [Visual, 1:28:47] On-screen list: “1. COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS”, “2. ???”, “3. NON-COVERT ACTION WHITE HOUSE SAPS”. [Visual, 1:28:54] An American flag flying atop the White House roof. [Narrator, 1:28:54] White House SAPs are not unheard of. A well-known example here is Yankee White. [Visual, 1:28:58] Text snippet explaining “Yankee White” security clearance over a background of the White House. [Narrator, 1:28:58] …a single-scope background investigation required for direct support for the White House. But Yankee White was indeed properly reported to Congress. [Visual, 1:29:09] Camera shot of the White House briefing room screen, with text “WH SAP”. [Narrator, 1:29:09] So, let’s say you have a White House SAP similar to Yankee White, but is handled by the National Security Council, and deals with what 50 US Code 3093 might consider “covert action.” [Visual, 1:29:16] A military operator in a gas mask, transitioning to personnel in hazmat suits packing gear. [Visual, 1:29:22] A satellite orbiting Earth, with text “WH SAP”, “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL DIRECTED”, “50 USC § 3093”, and a box labeled “NON-COVERT ACTION”. [Narrator, 1:29:22] If the SAP is given the non-covert action designation as defined by 50 US Code 3093, [Visual, 1:29:28] Satellite over Earth at night, with text box: “WAIVES ALL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS”. [Narrator, 1:29:28] …this completely removes any presidential finding/reporting requirements to Congress and intelligence committees. [Visual, 1:29:34] A satellite dish structure in space. [Visual, 1:29:36] Inside a hangar with a UFO, showing text diagram: “WH SAP” pointing to “SAP TYPES”. [Narrator, 1:29:36] The activity is then treated as a sensitive, but non-covert acquisition, intelligence research, or operation activity. [Visual, 1:29:45] Earth globe animation with text “WH SAP”, “50 USC § 3093”, and a box “NON-COVERT ACTION”. [Narrator, 1:29:46] Because the activity is not generated as a DoD SAP, it falls outside of 10 US Code 119, and thus is not subject to Title 10 requirements. [Visual, 1:29:50] The Earth globe animation, with text “10 USC § 119” inside a red circle with a red “X” over it. [Visual, 1:29:57] Night aerial shot of the Pentagon. [Narrator, 1:29:57] The White House SAP then exists in a gray area… [Visual, 1:29:59] Venn diagram of “50 USC § 3093” and “10 USC § 119” intersecting in a red “gray area” section. [Visual, 1:30:00] Venn diagram of 50 USC § 3093 and 10 USC § 119 over the Pentagon [Narrator, 1:30:00] area between 50 US Code 3093 and 10 US Code 119, with, and write this down because this is critical, no statutory reporting obligations, yet still answers directly to the National Security Council or cognizant executive authority. [Visual, 1:30:19] Black and white footage of Harry S. Truman with “UNITARY EXECUTIVE THEORY” overlay [Narrator, 1:30:19] One of the concerns of how this has been historically accomplished is the wielding of unitary executive theory by Presidents Eisenhower and Truman, essentially leveraging and exploiting the executive body’s inherent authority over classification and national security operations. [Visual, 1:30:27] Black and white footage of Dwight D. Eisenhower [Visual, 1:30:35] CGI of a black triangular UFO hovering over red terrain [Narrator, 1:30:35] But for a more tangible and concrete method here, this is really the most important part of the video. [Visual, 1:30:42] Black and white shot of a car windshield with American flag sticker and text overlay “CONTENT ONLY SAPS” [Narrator, 1:30:42] The loophole here is to harness content-only special access programs. [Visual, 1:30:49] Nuclear explosion with “SECRET” text overlay [Visual, 1:30:51] Washington D.C. skyline at dusk with “CONTENT ONLY SAP” list overlay [Narrator, 1:30:51] A content-only special access program is defined as a highly restrictive security protocol used within the US government to protect extremely sensitive information or intelligence, rather than an entire product or acquisition. Thus, content-only. [Visual, 1:31:09] US Capitol dome with “SAP” hierarchy chart overlay [Narrator, 1:31:08] Unlike acknowledged, unacknowledged, and waived, content-only is not a protection level. Here’s the kicker: it is a budgetary slash structural tier and an administrative designation. [Visual, 1:31:22] Montage of military forces with “CRITICAL PROGRAM INFORMATION (CPI)” overlay [Narrator, 1:31:22] Content-only SAPs hold protected information, but they are technically unfunded. The SAP either has no funding at all, or funding is rolled into normal executive armed forces or intelligence budgets. [Visual, 1:31:37] B-2 stealth bomber and military operations montage [Narrator, 1:31:37] Because content-only is unfunded, these SAPs carry zero reporting requirements. Doesn’t matter if it’s Title 10, Title 50, none. [Visual, 1:31:47] Low-resolution footage of a triangular UFO flying over trees [Narrator, 1:31:47] Content-only is an extremely niche designation, spoken about extremely infrequently. [Visual, 1:31:53] Close-up of a cassette tape running [Narrator, 1:31:53] Indeed, two of the only major discussions you will find on content-only SAPs exist within AFI 16-701, which describes the designation as, quote, “a descriptive term used to describe a SAP, or any sub-element, that contains information only and either has no funding associated with it or its funding is managed as part of the Air Force corporate budget process,” end quote… [Visual, 1:31:59] AFI 16-701 document pages with “Content-only” definition highlighted [Visual, 1:32:20] DoDI 5205.11 document pages with “content-only SAP” definition highlighted [Narrator, 1:32:19] …as well as DoDI 5205.11, which describes content SAPs as, quote, “a SAP that protects discrete CPI,” end quote. CPI of course, is critical program information. [Visual, 1:32:33] Desk with UFO magazines, a photograph, and a UAP Task Force seal [Narrator, 1:32:33] So, let’s think this through here. [Visual, 1:32:36] CGI of a flying saucer in a military hangar with flow chart overlays [Narrator, 1:32:36] Early UFO legacy program activities are conducted out of the 5412 Committee Special Group. Thus, retrieval, exploitation, and storage of non-human technical vehicles are inherently covert action. [Visual, 1:32:48] Black and white footage of President Eisenhower signing documents [Narrator, 1:32:48] Bonus points because POTUS at the time, Eisenhower, most certainly did not want national acknowledgment of the UFO issue. [Visual, 1:32:57] Black and white photo of Eisenhower’s cabinet, transitioning to Ronald Reagan speaking [Narrator, 1:32:56] Various classified presidential executive orders cemented program coordination within NSC’s 5412 Committee and successor groups, and up until the Reagan administration, legacy programs did whatever they wanted, the wild wild West days. [Visual, 1:33:12] Old television displaying Edward Aldridge speaking [Narrator, 1:33:12] Major SAP crackdowns forced the legacy structure to start leveraging cover offices and programs to stay hidden, effectively siloing the programs. [Visual, 1:33:21] Bill Clinton speaking, transitioning to a stealth jet hangar, then James Clapper [Narrator, 1:33:21] 1994 saw the programs’ best management outside of the US government into a quasi-government and industry control group that still features statutory controls and involvement by the National Security Council. Clapper, I’m looking at you. [Visual, 1:33:37] Glass laboratory with flying saucer, text overlays for 50 USC and 10 USC [Narrator, 1:33:36] The introduction of 50 US Code 3093 in the early 1990s and 10 US Code 119 in the late 1980s forced legacy to get creative again. [Visual, 1:33:48] Dark hangar view of a flying saucer, transitioning to a Presidential Seal on carpet [Narrator, 1:33:48] Historically covert UFO activities have been run out of the White House and National Security Council. [Visual, 1:33:54] Washington D.C. skyline at dusk, transitioning to a UFO model with code overlays and red Xs [Narrator, 1:33:54] But with all of these US government-wide oversight mechanisms, how does one make covert action programs and special access programs that waive Title 10 and Title 50 reporting requirements? You do this by making the covert action White House SAP non-covert. [Visual, 1:34:12] US Capitol dome at night with “CONTENT ONLY SAP” list overlay [Narrator, 1:34:12] So the solution here is to make covert UFO SAPs content-only, and thus all carve-out and reporting requirements are hidden and waived. [Visual, 1:34:22] Black and white view of the Pentagon, transitioning to night footage of a crashed saucer UFO with flashlights [Narrator, 1:34:22] The actual SAP program record contains critical program information, CPI, only, and actual craft retrieval, storage, and exploitation is not inherently conducted under the SAP, akin to standard SAP umbrellas. [Visual, 1:34:38] Washington D.C. skyline at night reflected in water [Narrator, 1:34:38] The program structure can harness dual-hatted roles, something I talk about often… [Visual, 1:34:44] USAF and NASIC emblems, transitioning to a soldier in night vision, then Edwards 412th Test Wing sign [Narrator, 1:34:44] …like the night shift guy at NASIC, a parallel Tier 1 element for retrievals, or a hidden wing under the Edwards 412th Test Wing to harness elements of the defense industrial base for these covert mission directives, whilst maintaining a short yet narrow chain of command. [Visual, 1:34:58] James Clapper sitting in a living room [Visual, 1:35:02] Whiteboard animation detailing FFRDCs (Federally Funded Research & Development Centers) [Narrator, 1:35:02] Of course, the program structure can use the subject matter experts and R&D aces, FFRDCs, which exist as GOCO, government-owned, contractor-operated… [Visual, 1:35:13] Close-up of a saucer UFO, transitioning to a digital globe network with “MITRE” text [Narrator, 1:35:13] …to keep program materials, activities, deliverables, reports, etc. in a quasi-government and industry state. Wink, wink, MITRE. [Visual, 1:35:23] Black and white $100 bills grid with a timeline overlay showing “NSC” to “COCO/FFRDC”, transitioning to Pentagon aerial view [Narrator, 1:35:23] And most importantly here, this SAP activity carries zero budget. The budget is rolled into standard USG budgets. [Visual, 1:35:33] Pilot in cockpit, transitioning to a hovering triangular UFO, then the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force logo [Narrator, 1:35:33] Think to when I talked about witness Ed, a lieutenant colonel within the hidden wing and a senior figure within SAF/AQ or Air Force Acquisition. [Visual, 1:35:41] Blurry CRT television screen displaying blue static [Narrator, 1:35:41] Ed stated money was just pulled off the books of the Air Force budget into black holes before any sort of review by SAF/FM or financial management. [Visual, 1:35:51] Footprint on the moon’s surface [Narrator, 1:35:51] With no dedicated budget, carries little to no monetary footprint. [Visual, 1:35:56] Admiral Wilson speaking, transitioning to a document of “Wilson Davis Notes” [Narrator, 1:35:56] Now think back to the Wilson-Davis notes. Remember what Wilson stated, that the legacy program record within the OUSDAT contained zero budget. That budget was kept in separate records for, quote, “audit purposes.” [Visual, 1:36:13] View of Earth from space with text overlay “NON-COVERT ACTION PROGRAMS CONTENT ONLY SAPS W/USAPS”, transitioning to spacecraft in orbit [Narrator, 1:36:12] This is one of the premier loopholes legacy uses alongside USAPs to completely hide and obfuscate UFO legacy programs, content-only SAPs. [Visual, 1:36:24] Image of Saturn, transitioning to the CIA seal on a floor with text overlay [Narrator, 1:36:26] Now, of course, similar systems exist within intelligence community controlled access programs, CAPs, and DOE SAPs. [Visual, 1:36:34] Distant view of the Pentagon with helicopters on the lawn [Narrator, 1:36:34] But I really wanted to take an extended top-down overview of how sensitive national programs and how the executive branch specifically has manipulated SAP structure to hide the legacy programs. [Visual, 1:36:42] Camera moving down a dark hallway [Visual, 1:36:46] Split-screen interview from Judicial Watch, transitioning to close-up of the interviewee [Guest, 1:36:46] And you have to remember the president has original classification authority over what they call classified national security information under Executive Order 13526. The issue is some of this is under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the president does not have unilateral classification authority… [Host, 1:36:53] Sure. [Visual, 1:37:05] Man in a podcast studio, transitioning to a CGI triangular UFO with yellow lights, then Department of Energy seal and flag [Narrator, 1:37:05] Of course, I must mention and we must spend some time discussing a nearly uncrackable system similar to White House non-covert action SAPs. These are Department of Energy SAPs. DOE SAPs get very spooky very fast. [Visual, 1:37:20] Document of DOE O 470.4B, transitioning to cartoon animations of reading and atomic symbols [Narrator, 1:37:20] DOE SAP authority is given from both Executive Order 13526, same as DOD SAPs, but also the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. We discussed at length in part one, the statutory authority born from the 1954 Atomic Energy agreement. [Visual, 1:37:37] Diagram of “TRACK 1” and “TRACK 2” classification systems, transitioning to a CGI hangar with a saucer UFO [Narrator, 1:37:36] In short, the classification system for the Department of Energy and its precursor Atomic Energy Commission system is very different to the standard executive order-based classification system. Concepts like restricted data, formerly restricted data, and broad interpretations of special nuclear materials as we know from David Grush are inappropriately draped over the UFO topic to maintain airtight secrecy. [Visual, 1:38:02] Table of Contents of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 document [Narrator, 1:38:01] Such systems born from the 1954 Atomic Energy Act are covered by statute and thus not responsive to magic executive orders and the standard DOD classification and declassification processes. [Visual, 1:38:15] David Grusch speaking in an interview on a podcast [David Grusch, 1:38:15] They’re basically treating this as nuclear secrets because it gives off, you know, nuclear radiation. Because if you look at the ultra-vague definition of special nuclear material, which is Section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, it says: anything that gives off a sizable amount of atomic energy. Literally that’s what it says. Well, what’s sizable, and what legal gymnastics are you saying this stuff, which is obviously not a—well, who knows, maybe it is—nuclear weapon, and you’re saying this is a US nuclear secret, you’re trans-classifying it into a nuclear secret, which I understand maybe at first why they did that… [Visual, 1:39:01] Aerial view of the Pentagon at night with classification system diagrams overlay [Narrator, 1:39:01] So DOE SAPs can operate under DOE SAP guidelines or the DOE’s own classification standard, whose authority is the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. [Visual, 1:39:12] Logos of Department of Energy and NNSA, transitioning to firefighters and a crashed saucer UFO [Narrator, 1:39:12] This second option here allows legacy elements within the Department of Energy and its semi-autonomous subordinate agency, the NNSA, National Nuclear Security Administration, to really deep-six and hide their SAPs under the guise and liberal interpretations of, quote, “nuclear secrets.” [Visual, 1:39:32] Podcast host speaking, with a “UFO LEGACY PROGRAMS” pyramid diagram overlay [Narrator, 1:39:31] This is why I have stated on several occasions the Department of Energy is figuratively baked into every single layer of the UFO legacy program pyramid… [Visual, 1:39:42] Hangar with saucer UFO transitioning to the Department of Energy seal, then Edwards 412th Test Wing sign and AFTC seal [Narrator, 1:39:41] …relegating program materials, reports, deliverables, etc. under DOE controls are incredibly airtight. An example here is actually the hidden wing again. Witness Ed stated from day-to-day operations with the AFTC or Air Force Test Center on the Edwards 412th… [Visual, 1:40:00] Map of California highlighting Edwards AFB and the 412th Test Wing. [Narrator, 1:40:00] …test wing, all the way up to Air Force acquisition. [Visual, 1:40:01] Assistant Secretary of the Air Force logo. [Narrator, 1:40:02] The Department of Energy was intimately involved with every layer of the program. [Visual, 1:40:03] “U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY” text overlay on a lab scene. [Visual, 1:40:08] Lue Elizondo walking in a hallway. [Narrator, 1:40:08] So no, Lue Elizondo, your false legacy program outline is inaccurate. [Visual, 1:40:10] Lue Elizondo speaking alongside text listing CIA, Air Force, Dept. of Energy, and contractors. [Visual, 1:40:13] Diagram illustrating “THE LEGACY PROGRAM” structure. [Narrator, 1:40:13] The Department of Energy is not an equal player with the Air Force and defense industrial base prime contractors. [Visual, 1:40:20] Department of Energy seal over a flag with energy dominance text. [Narrator, 1:40:20] Of course, in the future, I will do a full DOE investigation. [Visual, 1:40:24] Animation of Saturn and a circular reactor design. [Visual, 1:40:26] The White House at night with a list of SAP types. [Narrator, 1:40:26] Lastly, on our SAP section here, we have taken a top-down overview of SAPs, USAPs, WSAPs, covert and non-covert action programs, CAPs, DOE SAPs, and National Special Access Programs, or NSAPs. [Narrator, 1:40:40] But how can we translate these security protocols onto day-to-day operations of UFO legacy programs at defense industrial base locations? [Visual, 1:40:46] Military agency seals on a US map. [Visual, 1:40:49] Dugway Proving Ground logo. [Narrator, 1:40:49] From Dugway Proving Ground to the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane, I have not held back on locations that I am supremely confident engage with covert UFO retrieval and RDT&E. [Visual, 1:40:51] NAVSEA Crane logo. [Visual, 1:40:53] Airport control tower. [Visual, 1:40:55] F-16 fighter jets under a hangar canopy. [Visual, 1:41:00] Map showing major test facility bases across the US. [Narrator, 1:41:00] Indeed, I often state MRTFBs, or Major Range and Test Facility Bases, are the paramount critical physical cores to such operations. [Visual, 1:41:11] Black-and-white footage of a soldier at West Desert Test Center. [Narrator, 1:41:11] Places like Dugway, [Visual, 1:41:12] Clip of a pilot in a flight simulator or cockpit. [Narrator, 1:41:12] the Nevada Test and Training Range, [Visual, 1:41:14] Black-and-white footage of a fighter jet flying. [Narrator, 1:41:14] Utah Test and Training Range, [Visual, 1:41:15] Black-and-white clip of researchers in a control room. [Narrator, 1:41:15] China Lake, [Visual, 1:41:16] Black-and-white footage of a jet flight. [Narrator, 1:41:16] Edwards 412th Test Wing, [Visual, 1:41:18] Underwater clip of divers. [Narrator, 1:41:18] Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center, etc. [Visual, 1:41:22] Close-up of cassette tape reels turning. [Narrator, 1:41:22] But to get real specific here in reference to SAPs, [Visual, 1:41:25] Airport runway and buildings at sunset. [Narrator, 1:41:25] day-to-day handling of SAP material and physical access to SAP information must be confined to SCIFs, [Visual, 1:41:31] Drone silhouette at sunset with SCIF text. [Narrator, 1:41:31] or Secure Compartmented Information Facilities, or accredited Special Access Program facilities (SAPFs), which are permanent locations. [Visual, 1:41:35] Silhouette of an aircraft front profile. [Visual, 1:41:36] 3D architectural rendering of a secure facility structure. [Visual, 1:41:39] Large rocket engine firing on a test stand. [Narrator, 1:41:40] Alongside permanent accredited SAPFs, SAP activities involving the processing, handling, and/or storage of classified information can occur within several other facilities. [Visual, 1:41:40] Sleek drone aircraft inside a hangar. [Visual, 1:41:43] Pair of unmanned stealth aircraft in a hangar. [Visual, 1:41:44] Technicians in cleanroom suits working on aerospace equipment. [Visual, 1:41:48] Vehicle platform labeled “184K402TXB UNIT 1”. [Visual, 1:41:49] Soldier looking through binoculars or a scope next to a radar unit. [Visual, 1:41:50] Missile launch from a mobile platform. [Visual, 1:41:52] Document screenshot showing SAP security policies. [Narrator, 1:41:52] These include temporary SAPFs, or T-SAPFs, which are limited to 12 months operations, [Narrator, 1:41:58] SAP Compartmented Areas, SAPCAs, [Narrator, 1:42:01] SAP Working Areas for processing and discussion without storage of CPI, SAPWAs, [Narrator, 1:42:07] and SAP Temporary Security Working Areas limited to 40 hours per month, also called SAPTSWAs. [Visual, 1:42:14] Red wall panels slowly sliding open. [Narrator, 1:42:14] SAPFs can be placed anywhere that meet or exceed SCIF standards, permanently placed on contractor facilities within defense industrial base infrastructure, [Visual, 1:42:15] Glowing red room with circular Air Force logo. [Visual, 1:42:20] Close-up of a pilot in a red-lit cockpit. [Visual, 1:42:22] Skunk Works logo fading on screen. [Narrator, 1:42:22] and employ extensive physical, electronic, visual, etc., safeguards to ensure the sanctity of SAP materials. [Visual, 1:42:24] Security guards patrolling near a white truck. [Visual, 1:42:27] Two military helicopters flying over water. [Visual, 1:42:30] F-22 Raptor inside a hangar silhouette. [Visual, 1:42:31] Aerial footage of the Pentagon building. [Narrator, 1:42:31] Day-to-day operations of SAPs rely on both government and contractor personnel. [Visual, 1:42:38] Government Program Manager description box overlay. [Narrator, 1:42:38] Such a roster here includes a Government Program Manager, or GPM, who is a senior government program official, the Government Program Manager is responsible for all aspects of the SAP. [Visual, 1:42:47] Contractor Program Manager description box overlay with B-2 bomber. [Narrator, 1:42:47] A Contractor Program Manager, or CPM, who is the industry equivalent to the GPM and is responsible for the program’s overall management within the contractor facility, and is responsible for executing all contractual obligations. [Visual, 1:43:01] Program Security Officer description box overlay on a Top Secret document. [Narrator, 1:43:01] A Program Security Officer, or PSO, who is responsible for full spectrum program security, [Visual, 1:43:07] Government SAP Security Office description box overlay. [Narrator, 1:43:07] government SAP security officers, or GSSOs, under the PSO, [Visual, 1:43:11] Contractor Program Security Officer description box overlay. [Narrator, 1:43:11] and a Contractor Program Security Officer, or CPSO. [Visual, 1:43:15] Oscilloscope waveform showing signals. [Narrator, 1:43:15] This here is a perfect bridge into our next section, [Visual, 1:43:16] Small rocket soaring in the sky. [Visual, 1:43:18] DARPA logo. [Narrator, 1:43:18] program protection agencies who often live within the program security channels, [Visual, 1:43:24] Metal object spinning inside laboratory apparatus. [Narrator, 1:43:24] deputized by elements of the legacy programs to neutralize program exposure and insider and outsider threats. [Visual, 1:43:33] Text “PROGRAM PROTECTION” on a black screen. [Visual, 1:43:39] Mr. David Grusch testifying at a congressional hearing. [Mr. Grusch, 1:43:39] Uh, but I, I do have knowledge of, um, active planned, uh, reprisal activity against myself and other colleagues, and it’s very, very upsetting to me. [Visual, 1:43:48] Representative Jamie Raskin questioning. [Mr. Raskin, 1:43:48] Coming from where? [Mr. Grusch, 1:43:49] Uh, certain senior leadership at previous agencies I was associated with, and that’s all I’ll say publicly, but I can provide more details in a closed environment. [Mr. Grusch, 1:43:59] Yeah, there were certain colleagues of mine that were brutally administratively attacked, and it, you know, actually makes me very upset, uh, as a leader, to see that happen to other co-workers, and actually, superiors of mine over the last three years. [Mr. Raskin, 1:44:11] How do you account for that response? That, that seems like a bizarre response. [Mr. Grusch, 1:44:15] Uh, I call it administrative terrorism. That’s their, their quiver, their tool in the toolbox, uh, to silence people, especially, you know, a career government service cares about their career, cares about their clearance, uh, their reputation, to climb the ladder, and when you threaten that, uh, flow, career path, uh, uh, a lot of people back off. [Mr. Grusch, 1:44:35] Um, but I’m here to represent those people. [Visual, 1:44:38] Radar screen animation tracking targets. [Narrator, 1:44:38] Let us now move down the onion and identify program exposure management and protection agencies, elements of specific US agencies/services that are deputized to enforce insider and outsider threat protection, all to enforce total security surrounding UFO legacy programs. [Visual, 1:44:53] CGI of a disc-shaped UFO flying. [Visual, 1:44:55] CGI of the UFO exploding and crashing. [Visual, 1:44:58] Close-up of slicing a red onion. [Narrator, 1:44:58] If we have the core onion protected by layers of exploited Special Access Program protocols, which are in turn protected by the SAPOC SRG, think of program protection agencies as the antibodies that swarm to neutralize threats to the core of legacy. [Visual, 1:45:06] 3D animation of red strands swarming a spherical core. [Visual, 1:45:14] Aerial view of the Pentagon with SAP structure checklist. [Narrator, 1:45:14] Of course, program protection and program exposure management are inherent to the SAP structure, and we discussed as such in our SAP section with defining Component, USD, and DoD level SAPCOs, SAPOC, and the SRG. [Visual, 1:45:29] Soldiers walking down a blue-lit hallway. [Narrator, 1:45:29] There is nothing nefarious about program protection. Indeed, the concept is critical to maintaining a healthy SAP enterprise. [Visual, 1:45:31] B-2 bomber in a hangar with green lasers. [Visual, 1:45:37] Podcast host speaking into a microphone. [Narrator, 1:45:37] I am stating that under, or better phrased here, within the SAP ecosystem, exists several agencies, offices, or services that are deputized to protect and neutralize threats towards high risk waived National Special Access Programs regarding covert UFO action. [Visual, 1:45:47] CGI of a black triangular UFO hovering at night. [Visual, 1:45:54] Capitol building at dusk. [Narrator, 1:45:55] Unlike other program protection elements that exist outside the SAPCO, SAPOC, and SRG DoD pyramid, like the ISOO, or the Information Security Oversight Office, and DCSA, Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, [Visual, 1:46:02] Information Security Oversight Office seal. [Visual, 1:46:05] Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency seal. [Visual, 1:46:09] Aerial view of the Pentagon. [Narrator, 1:46:09] the select agencies we will speak on exist within the very same agencies and departments within the Armed Forces, Intelligence Community, and DoD that operate on UFO legacy activities. [Visual, 1:46:19] Large circular object in a warehouse facility. [Narrator, 1:46:18] And I have spoken about one such agency extensively in my video on the Air Force Hidden Wing Program. This being the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, Office of Special Projects, or AFOSI/PJ. [Visual, 1:46:21] Finger pressing play button on a tape deck. [Visual, 1:46:24] Night-vision view of the sea. [Visual, 1:46:28] AFOSI/PJ logo. [Visual, 1:46:34] Slide about the Office of Special Projects with photo. [Narrator, 1:46:35] Indeed, this office, PJ, is tasked with safeguarding the US Air Force’s most sensitive and secretive Special Access Programs. [Visual, 1:46:44] Slide titled “PJ On The Case” with helicopter photo. [Narrator, 1:46:44] I really don’t want to spend too much time on PJ, but once again, I will bring up two names attached to PJ that I am aware are paramount gatekeepers to the UFO topic. [Visual, 1:46:54] Unmanned aircraft flying in the clouds. [Narrator, 1:46:54] And these include former AFOSI/PJ Executive Director and department-wide Air Force SAP Security Director, now Vice President of Security at Northrop Grumman, former Senior Executive Service, Mr. Terry Phillips. [Visual, 1:47:04] Photo portrait of Terry W. Phillips. [Narrator, 1:47:08] I am aware that before his retirement from federal service in 2021, Phillips operated as an enforcer for the UFO activity and administrative structure, leveraging administrative terrorism and much worse against prospective whistleblowers. [Visual, 1:47:25] CGI of a drone swimming underwater. [Narrator, 1:47:25] Indeed, I understand Phillips continues similar work within Northrop Grumman to this day. [Visual, 1:47:28] Northrop Grumman logo. [Visual, 1:47:31] Side-by-side photos of Terry W. Phillips and Lee M. Russ. [Narrator, 1:47:31] Phillips’ successor in AFOSI/PJ and the Air Force SAP Security Enterprise is a man named Mr. Lee M. Russ. [Visual, 1:47:38] CGI of a triangular spacecraft in orbit. [Narrator, 1:47:39] Similar to Phillips, I understand Mr. Russ picked up right where Phillips left off within federal service. Let’s just say I would not be surprised if documents are ever released that directly state Russ has been involved in UFO narrative shaping. [Visual, 1:47:44] Cockpit of a fighter jet. [Visual, 1:47:54] Podcast host talking. [Narrator, 1:47:54] Phillips and Russ are critical names, but alas, I have covered these two in great detail before, so let’s move on to new things here. [Visual, 1:48:02] DARPA logo. [Narrator, 1:48:02] I would like to now move on to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Security and Intelligence Directorate (SID). [Visual, 1:48:08] DARPA Security & Intelligence Directorate logo. [Visual, 1:48:12] Person walking into a hangar at sunset. [Speaker 1, 1:48:12] Coming to DARPA is like grabbing the nose cone of a rocket and holding on for dear life. [Visual, 1:48:13] DARPA sign on a wall. [Visual, 1:48:14] Crowd of people looking at the sky. [Visual, 1:48:15] Time-lapse of star movements. [Visual, 1:48:16] Blueprint circuit animation. [Visual, 1:48:17] Scientist holding glowing fiber optic strands. [Visual, 1:48:18] Close-up of typing on a keyboard. [Speaker 2, 1:48:18] DARPA’s a place where, if you don’t invent the internet, you only get a ‘B’. [Visual, 1:48:21] View of ocean waves from above. [Visual, 1:48:23] Flying over clouds. [Speaker 3, 1:48:22] A DARPA program manager, quite literally, invents tomorrow. [Visual, 1:48:24] Earth from space. [Visual, 1:48:26] 3D animation of firing neurons. [Speaker 4, 1:48:26] We are thinking about innovation unconstrained. Where can we go? [Visual, 1:48:30] Soldiers in forest training with purple smoke. [Speaker 5, 1:48:30] predict what is emerging as threats. [Visual, 1:48:32] Soldier aiming a shoulder-launched weapon. [Visual, 1:48:33] Walkway in a data center. [Speaker 6, 1:48:33] We’re looking for the applications that seem impossible. [Visual, 1:48:35] Microscopic molecular animation. [Visual, 1:48:36] Technicians in white bunny suits. [Visual, 1:48:37] Pilot having mask adjusted. [Speaker 7, 1:48:36] that passion will be saving lives 5, 10, 15 years from now. [Visual, 1:48:38] Group of military officers. [Visual, 1:48:39] Busy city street crossing. [Visual, 1:48:41] Silhouettes in a glass office building. [Speaker 8, 1:48:41] Coming to work every day and being humbled by that. [Visual, 1:48:42] US flag waving. [Visual, 1:48:44] DARPA logo. [Narrator, 1:48:44] Real fast, what exactly is DARPA? [Visual, 1:48:46] Wireframe of an F-35 fighter jet. [Narrator, 1:48:46] DARPA is the DoD R&D, research and development, agency reporting to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering that is tasked with development of emerging and advanced technologies for military use. [Visual, 1:48:49] Rendered fighter jet with components highlighted. [Visual, 1:48:50] Virtual matrix animation. [Visual, 1:49:00] Slide showing Economist article titled “A growing number of governments hope to clone America’s DARPA”. [Narrator, 1:48:59] As the agency that, quote-unquote, “shaped the modern world,” DARPA is the tip of the spear for advanced asymmetrical advantages in national security-related technology. [Visual, 1:49:10] Glowing signals moving along lines. [Narrator, 1:49:10] DARPA is well worth an enormous exploration into possible involvement with recovered non-human materials, craft, and bodies, as DARPA is strangely and largely missing from most UFO legacy program conversations. [Visual, 1:49:16] Spherical constellation of data nodes. [Visual, 1:49:22] Animation of moving cubes. [Visual, 1:49:24] Classified document files and UFO magazine on a table. [Narrator, 1:49:25] And do not fret, one day, I will undertake this effort. [Visual, 1:49:29] Slide showing DARPA organization chart. [Narrator, 1:49:29] The DARPA SID, or again, Security and Intelligence Directorate, is a critical support component within DARPA. [Narrator, 1:49:36] SID works to ensure protection of DARPA’s high-risk R&D programs that involve highly sensitive technologies critical to US national security. [Narrator, 1:49:46] SID safeguards against insider threats, foreign influence, espionage, and a wide swath of protection protocols to ensure US technological dominance. [Narrator, 1:49:56] DARPA SID is the premier program protection element… [Visual, 1:50:00] Fighter jets flying in formation [Narrator, 1:50:00] DARPA agency-wide and inner-agency SID activity. Quote, [Visual, 1:50:04] Document titled “We share the mission” with highlighted text [Narrator, 1:50:05] planning, executing, and directing the information, personnel, industrial, information assurance, and physical security programs at DARPA, and at specific contractor sites, end quote. [Visual, 1:50:16] “REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT” red warning tags hanging in a dark room [Narrator, 1:50:16] Indeed, SID’s expressed mission is to, quote, [Visual, 1:50:20] Document section “1.3. SID’s mission is to develop, manage and implement…” [Narrator, 1:50:20] develop, manage, and implement programs that facilitate the secure and successful accomplishment of DARPA’s mission, while protecting DARPA technical and administrative personnel, information, property, and ensuring business continuity, end quote. [Narrator, 1:50:35] In an almost comical statement, DARPA SID’s PSRs, or program security representatives, quote, [Visual, 1:50:35] Helicopter landing on tarmac seen from inside a cockpit [Visual, 1:50:42] Document section on “The DARPA PSR is unparalleled…” [Narrator, 1:50:42] analyze and create protection strategies and tactics, frequently for technologies that exist nowhere else, end quote. [Visual, 1:50:51] Glitchy satellite view transition [Narrator, 1:50:51] DARPA SID is incredibly unique as an office, because its security representatives are not stovepiped into specific types of program security support. Example being, just collateral, just SAP or SCI, or just CUI. [Visual, 1:50:54] F-22 fighter jet with text “DRIVEN BY SPEED” [Visual, 1:51:02] Soldiers at a table with text “GROUNDED IN SAFETY” [Narrator, 1:51:07] Instead, SID’s PSRs are, quote, [Visual, 1:51:10] Document text showing “support (i.e., just collateral…” [Narrator, 1:51:10] responsible for providing expert security support to a program portfolio that may include fundamental research, controlled unclassified, collateral, SAP, SCI, and other compartmented information activities, end quote. [Narrator, 1:51:24] And another quote, quote, they are the tip of the spear for execution of SID’s primary function, enabling the secure development of DARPA technologies, end quote. [Visual, 1:51:26] Document text highlighting “tip of the spear” [Visual, 1:51:34] Night view of the Pentagon and Washington Monument in the distance [Narrator, 1:51:35] Now apply this hands-on SID approach to some of the day-to-day SAP operations we just spoke of. [Visual, 1:51:41] Document routing sheet: “ROUTING FOR DARPA IPTO BAA 03-XX 30 LifeLog” [Narrator, 1:51:42] As best as I can tell, the SID was founded by at least 2003, when the first mention of SID I can find is a routing line for a DARPA Information Processing Techniques Office document. [Visual, 1:51:52] Two round seals side-by-side: “SID” and “ACCESS CONTROL SPECIALIST” [Narrator, 1:51:53] I wonder what office would ostensibly function as, quote-unquote, “antibodies” if someone posed a security risk to the most covert, deep-six’d, inner-agency waved USAP portfolio in existence. [Visual, 1:51:58] A man speaking at a congressional hearing with the two seals superimposed [Visual, 1:52:02] A large circular metallic object in a hangar with the two seals superimposed [Narrator, 1:52:06] I will go so far as to say, I’m aware of former directors within DARPA SID that have engaged in serious crimes to silence whistleblowers and prevent program exposure. These include, but are not limited to, wetworks operations. [Visual, 1:52:07] A young man with headphones speaking into a podcast microphone [Visual, 1:52:18] Soldiers in black tactical gear aiming rifles under bright lights [Visual, 1:52:23] Blue static glitch transition [Narrator, 1:52:23] I would encourage Congress to immediately construct interrogatories directed at DARPA SID and its SSO Support Services office. I would leverage questions towards former SID directors under penalty of prosecution if questions are not answered truthfully. [Visual, 1:52:24] Night view of the US Capitol dome [Narrator, 1:52:40] I genuinely hope this does happen. [Visual, 1:52:41] Metal structure transition [Visual, 1:52:43] Globe view of Earth from space at night showing city lights [Narrator, 1:52:44] Now, believe it or not, I do have some sense of self-preservation, so I will not be naming this individual. But it would not be a good video without names. [Visual, 1:52:51] Glitchy close-up of a handshake in black and white [Visual, 1:52:55] White honeycomb pattern with DARPA logo appearing [Narrator, 1:52:55] DARPA reports through the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering directly to the USD(R&E). [Visual, 1:53:00] Seal of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USDR&E) [Visual, 1:53:02] Black and white photo of Vannevar Bush in front of a bookshelf [Narrator, 1:53:03] Recall from earlier, USD(R&E) is the evolution of Vannevar Bush’s Research and Development Board, RDB. And according to DoDI 5205.11, USD(R&E), quote, [Visual, 1:53:07] Title cover of “RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD” [Visual, 1:53:09] Document title “DOD INSTRUCTION 5205.11 MANAGEMENT, ADMINISTRATION, AND OVERSIGHT OF DOD SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAMS” [Narrator, 1:53:13] identifies and cultivates cutting edge technology developments, technology transition, developmental prototyping, experimentation, and developmental testing activities and programs requiring SAP protection to ensure continued U.S. warfighting advantage, end quote. [Visual, 1:53:15] Document pages of DoDI 5205.11 with highlighted sections [Visual, 1:53:30] Organizational chart of DARPA showing SID’s position [Narrator, 1:53:30] Since SID is a support directorate directly under the DARPA Director, SID’s direct administrative line of accountability traces directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. [Visual, 1:53:35] Flowchart: “DARPA SID → DARPA DIR. → DUSD(R&E) → USD(R&E)” superimposed over scenes of office and laboratory work [Visual, 1:53:43] A bald man with glasses in a suit walking onto a stage with flags behind him [Narrator, 1:53:43] So, let’s name a man within this chain of command that I know to be legacy program: Dr. Peter Highnam. [Visual, 1:53:47] Close-up of the bald man speaking at a podium labeled “quantum world congress” [Peter Highnam, 1:53:51] So DARPA works at the intersection of national security and science and technology. Our job is to avoid and to impose technological surprise, and we focus on the hardest problems. [Narrator, 1:54:03] Dr. Highnam currently serves as the principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for critical technologies, within the USD(R&E). [Visual, 1:54:04] Text overlay: “DR. PETER HIGHNAM - PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF WAR FOR CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES, OUSW(R&E)” [Narrator, 1:54:11] And by the way, critical technologies in high-level DoD positions is often an indicator of legacy exposure. [Visual, 1:54:12] UFO/flying saucer in a glass enclosure/hangar with scientists and military guards surrounding it [Visual, 1:54:20] Glitch transition [Narrator, 1:54:20] Prior to work within the OSD, Highnam operated as a DARPA program manager focused on electronic warfare and airborne communications. [Visual, 1:54:21] Document section: “From 1999 to 2003, Dr. Highnam was a DARPA program manager…” [Visual, 1:54:29] Document section: “Dr. Highnam was the director of research at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)…” [Narrator, 1:54:29] Served as director of ODNI’s Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, IARPA; director of research at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, NGA; then from 2018 to 2022, served as deputy director and acting director of DARPA. [Visual, 1:54:35] Seal of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) [Visual, 1:54:40] Document text overlay: “Before joining OUSW(R&E), Dr. Highnam was the Deputy Director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)…” [Visual, 1:54:47] Close-up photo of Dr. Peter Highnam with DARPA logo in background [Narrator, 1:54:47] If there is indeed an individual who has been integral to coordinating legacy efforts between DARPA and USD(R&E), and then don’t forget DARPA SID for program protection within the last eight-plus years, as I am directly alleging, it has been and continues to be Dr. Peter Highnam. [Visual, 1:55:05] Glitch transition [Narrator, 1:55:05] Since 2012, SID has maintained an intimate partnership with a company called System High. Indeed, since 2012, the two’s partnership has, quote, [Visual, 1:55:06] Webpage screenshot: “System High Awarded the DARPA Security and Intelligence Directorate (SID) Program Security Services Contract” [Visual, 1:55:15] Highlighted text in the webpage article [Narrator, 1:55:15] produced several novel advancements in security policies, enhanced methodologies and tools, end quote. [Visual, 1:55:22] Dark blue screen with a stylized blue and white “S” logo and “SYSTEM HIGH” [Narrator, 1:55:23] Indeed, in 2022, SID awarded a five-year contract to System High to, quote, [Visual, 1:55:24] Text overlay: “SYSTEM HIGH - Proactive Protection.” [Visual, 1:55:26] A military plane or helicopter on tarmac with overlay: “LIFECYCLE PROTECTION” [Visual, 1:55:29] Glitch transition showing highlighted press release text [Narrator, 1:55:29] provide multi-security services for our nation’s premier innovation engine responsible for developing and delivering breakthrough technologies critical to assuring U.S. technical dominance and overmatch, end quote. [Visual, 1:55:41] Dark blue screen with list of services under “SYSTEM HIGH PROACTIVE PROTECTION” [Narrator, 1:55:42] This 2022 contract was the third consecutive awarded to System High by SID. Founded in 2005, an important year to contractor breakaway legacy programs, [Visual, 1:55:54] System High website homepage [Narrator, 1:55:54] System High, quote, delivers the most advanced protection and secrecy solutions to secure and strengthen critical missions, programs, operations, and intelligence activities, end quote. [Visual, 1:56:06] Glitch transition [Visual, 1:56:07] Cloud background with text: “STRENGTHENING SECRECY” [Narrator, 1:56:07] The mission of System High is to be the only choice when the mission must be protected, to set the bar high and exceed it by working together to continuously improve and strengthen the protection landscape, and deliver for our customers at a level no one else is capable of. [Visual, 1:56:23] Blue screen with static glitch [Narrator, 1:56:23] Outside of DARPA SID here, System High currently has numerous contract vehicles, including IDIQ, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts, with the Navy, Missile Defense Agency, MDA, and other agencies/services. [Visual, 1:56:34] Document listing System High contracts (SHIELD, DASA-20A, MDA Trimode, SeaPort NxG) [Visual, 1:56:39] Glitch transition [Narrator, 1:56:39] System High has some rather intriguing individuals on its board, including former C-suite executive and president during our epoch of interest from 2019 to 2025, Rob Howe, who, prior to System High, was a manager for, quote-unquote, “special activities” at Northrop Grumman. [Visual, 1:56:46] Photo of Rob Howe with name “ROB HOWE” [Visual, 1:56:52] Career list for Rob Howe [Narrator, 1:57:08] A PSO, or program security officer, for SAF/AQ, again, Air Force Acquisition. And, of course, served in the Air Force at the AFFTC, all major elements within UFO legacy programs. [Visual, 1:57:09] Close-up of metallic circular craft with small red dot/light [Visual, 1:57:13] The two seals from earlier side-by-side: “SID” and “ACCESS CONTROL SPECIALIST” [Narrator, 1:57:13] DARPA SID is a very little-known element that safeguards the U.S. most innovative and secretive science and technology programs, and an office that engages in UFO legacy program exposure management and protection. [Visual, 1:57:28] Close up of Saturn’s rings from space [Visual, 1:57:30] Lt Gen Donna Shipton speaking to the camera [Lt Gen Donna Shipton, 1:57:30] To the uniformed and civilian airmen of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, our contractors, and the defense industrial base, thank you for being here, and thank you for all that you do to support our great nation during this time of consequence. [Visual, 1:57:44] Logo of the “AIR FORCE LCMC” [Visual, 1:57:48] Personnel standing in front of a B-2 stealth bomber in a hangar [Narrator, 1:57:48] Now on to a mouthful here, AFLCMC/IP, or the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s Information Protection Directorate. [Visual, 1:57:50] A B-2 bomber in a hangar with text “AFLCMC/IP AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER INFORMATION PROTECTION DIRECTORATE” [Visual, 1:57:58] Lt Gen Donna Shipton speaking to the camera [Narrator, 1:57:58] AFLCMC is currently directed by Lieutenant General Donna Shipton, a senior individual within Air Force UFO legacy activities that also formally served a senior position within SAF/AQ, [Visual, 1:58:00] Text overlay: “Lt Gen Donna Shipton AFLCMC COMMANDER” [Visual, 1:58:03] Diagram showing “TRIANGULAR AIRFRAME - DERIVED NHI PROPULSION” [Visual, 1:58:10] Seal of SAF/AQ [Narrator, 1:58:11] where Shipton was, quote, [Visual, 1:58:12] Biography page of Lt. Gen. Donna D. Shipton with highlighted sections [Narrator, 1:58:12] responsible for research and development, test, production, product support, and modernization of Air Force programs worth more than $60 billion annually, end quote. [Visual, 1:58:23] Six seals representing Air Force commands/labs side-by-side [Narrator, 1:58:23] AFLCMC is one of six major operational centers under Air Force Major Command, Air Force Materiel Command, AFMC, alongside AFTC we spoke about earlier, as well as AFRL, Air Force Research Lab. [Visual, 1:58:32] AFRL logo/shield in close-up [Visual, 1:58:38] Glitch transition showing the shields of AFMC [Narrator, 1:58:38] My hidden wing project painstakingly details the history and evolution of AFMC, and why this major command is one of the most critical to all of Air Force UFO activities. So I do strongly recommend viewing that if you haven’t already for some background. [Visual, 1:58:44] Four screens showing flight control rooms/simulators [Visual, 1:58:56] Sign “UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE” [Narrator, 1:58:56] Centered out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, the AFLCMC mission is to deliver affordable and sustainable war-winning capabilities to U.S. and international partners, on time, on cost, anywhere, anytime from cradle to grave. [Narrator, 1:59:12] AFLCMC is the single center responsible for total lifecycle management of all aircraft, engines, munitions, and electronic systems. [Visual, 1:59:21] Organizational chart of AFLCMC [Narrator, 1:59:21] AFLCMC’s portfolio includes Information Technology systems and networks, Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance systems, armaments, strategic systems, aerial platforms, plus installation and infrastructure management, advanced training capabilities, as well as combat readiness programs that focus on equipping the warfighter with the tools needed for protection in all environments. [Visual, 1:59:49] Glitch transition showing “AFLCMC/IP” and sunset horizon [Narrator, 1:59:49] AFLCMC/IP, or again, Information Protection Directorate, is the premier program protection element for Air Force acquisition and sustainment. Again, recall my hidden [Visual, 1:59:54] Document page: “INFORMATION PROTECTION - COMMON OCCUPATIONAL SERIES CODE: 0080” with logo of AFLCMC/IP [Visual, 2:00:00] Fighter jet canopy and Air Force acquisition seal [Narrator, 2:00:00] …wing project, where SAF/AQ under the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics is a major administrative element within the Air Force’s work on UFO RDT&E. [Visual, 2:00:13] AFLCMC Information Protection Support Directorate webpage [Narrator, 2:00:13] The AFLCMC IP, quote, “enhances the ability to acquire and support war-winning capabilities by providing a professional security workforce and risk-based processes to protect technology and information from unauthorized disclosure or compromise throughout a program’s life cycle,” end quote. [Visual, 2:00:33] Fighter jet taking off with afterburner at night [Narrator, 2:00:33] This protection of information and technology extends across the entire Air Force acquisition umbrella… [Visual, 2:00:40] Circular Air Force badges surrounding the AFMC seal, showing “ONE AFMC” [Narrator, 2:00:40] …involving work within AFMC’s other major operating areas, including AFTC and AFRL. [Narrator, 2:00:46] Air Force Test and Evaluation or AF/TE, specifically AF/TEZ Special Programs Division… [Visual, 2:00:47] AF/TE organizational chart and document page [Visual, 2:00:53] MRTFB National Treasures text screen [Narrator, 2:00:53] …and across all Air Force Major Range and Test Facility Bases, MRTFB. [Visual, 2:00:59] AFLCMC/IP to SAF/AAZ diagram over military planes silhouette [Narrator, 2:00:59] AFLCMC/IP also interfaces with the Air Force component level SAPCO, SAF/AAZ. [Visual, 2:01:06] Book pages with highlighted text under SAF/AA and “Outside Activities” [Narrator, 2:01:06] We know from part one SAF/AA has been bypassed for activities that I am highly confident are legacy operations, quote-unquote “outside activities” under Edward C. Aldridge. [Visual, 2:01:18] 3D model of a saucer-shaped craft and a photo of William E. MacLure [Narrator, 2:01:18] But specific SAF/AAZ heads have been senior legacy officials before, including William E. MacLure. [Visual, 2:01:25] Mr. Terrence L. Reynolds profile on the AFLCMC webpage [Narrator, 2:01:25] From studying the CV of the current director of IP, Mr. Terrence L. Reynolds… [Visual, 2:01:31] Fighter jets in flight with AFLCMC/IP logo [Narrator, 2:01:31] …we can learn a little more about how extensive IP’s program protection strategies reach across the entire Department of the Air Force. [Visual, 2:01:39] Bio document for Terrence L. Reynolds overlaid on an airfield hangar [Narrator, 2:01:39] Mr. Reynolds guides the IP on, quote, “information security, personnel security, industrial security, acquisition security, international program security, operations security, scientific and technical information program, and program protection planning,” end quote. [Visual, 2:01:56] Animated triangular craft flying over a runway hangar [Narrator, 2:01:56] I don’t want to spend too much time on IP here, but I did find such a directorate critical to mention as an addendum to my Air Force hidden wing project, where AFLCMC IP is critical to information program protection with administrative levels of the Air Force, specifically Air Force acquisition. [Visual, 2:02:14] White screen transition [Narrator, 2:02:15] Last program protection office to cover here. Just as we shifted our sights ever so briefly to the Department of Energy towards the end of our special access program section and commented on how the DOE, beholden to its own statutory authority, separate from standard Executive Order based classification systems, gets real spooky real fast… [Visual, 2:02:22] Department of Energy seal [Visual, 2:02:35] Animated circular craft with three lights at night under the text “W/USAP” and “1954 AEA” [Narrator, 2:02:35] …and operates as a perfect ecosystem for USAPs, with even tighter security protocols governed by the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. [Visual, 2:02:44] Document page outlining “Chapter 12 Special Access Programs” [Narrator, 2:02:45] The Department of Energy actually has its own SAPOC. Its SAPs are that sensitive. Not a component level SAPCO, but its very own SAPOC. [Visual, 2:02:55] Logos for AFLCMC/IP, AFOSI/PJ, DARPA, and Office of Special Projects appearing [Narrator, 2:02:55] Similar to how AFLCMC IP, AFOSI PJ and DARPA SID are specialized units that aid in the safeguarding of SAP ecosystems… [Visual, 2:03:04] DOE emblem with “Unleashing American ENERGY Dominance” text [Narrator, 2:03:04] …the DOE has their own very broad version of this as well, the DOE OICI, or Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence. And that’s right, the DOE has its own intelligence agency. [Visual, 2:03:08] DOE Forrestal Building in Washington, D.C. [Visual, 2:03:19] “DOE OICI” and “DOE-IN” text over space background [Narrator, 2:03:19] DOE OICI, sometimes referred to as DOE-IN, according to its mission statement, quote… [Visual, 2:03:25] Slide sequence of scientific, industrial, and financial images with mission text [Narrator, 2:03:25] …informs national security decision makers to mitigate threats to the DOE enterprise and the nation’s energy security by providing unique scientific and technical intelligence and expertise, end quote. [Visual, 2:03:37] Sheets of printed $100 bills [Narrator, 2:03:37] Though quite small in size, and maintaining a classified budget out of fiscal year 2026’s 81.9 billion dollar national intelligence program’s budget… [Visual, 2:03:47] Document titled “About the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (IN)” [Narrator, 2:03:47] …to say OICI is instrumental in DOE compartmented projects would be an egregious understatement. [Visual, 2:03:55] ODNI seal and organizational chart [Narrator, 2:03:55] Not only is OICI the DOE’s primary interface with ODNI and other intelligence agencies… [Visual, 2:04:02] People in hazmat suits in a desert terrain with OICI description text [Narrator, 2:04:02] …OICI specializes on insights into foreign nuclear capability and activities, counterintelligence including espionage and insider threats, nuclear material security, protects critical infrastructure, and support interactions with DOE’s national laboratories, and much, much more. [Visual, 2:04:20] “DEPARTMENTS” chart showing the Department of Energy seal and description [Narrator, 2:04:20] After all, ODNI states OICI’s mission is to, quote, “protect, enable, and represent the vast scientific brain trust resident in DOE’s laboratories and plants,” end quote. [Visual, 2:04:32] Document list from the Manhattan Project [Narrator, 2:04:32] Perhaps it should be no surprise, but OICI’s roots can be traced back to the Manhattan Project’s Alsos missions, which we discussed in great detail in part one. [Visual, 2:04:42] “THE BLACK BUDGET” title card over government seals [Narrator, 2:04:42] …basically the blueprint for a parallel intelligence apparatus for legacy activities completely removed from standard chains of command. [Visual, 2:04:50] “Program Tracks Nuclear Materials Worldwide” document [Narrator, 2:04:50] I am particularly interested in OICI’s Nuclear Materials Information Program, NMIP, established by NSPD-48/HSPD-17. [Visual, 2:05:02] Interview scene with a man in a blue suit [Narrator, 2:05:02] As we know from part one and my other previous works, as well as David Grusch… [Visual, 2:05:05] David Grusch testifying at a congressional hearing [Visual, 2:05:07] Text page for the “ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954” [Narrator, 2:05:07] …language from the 1954 Atomic Energy Agreement has been literally distorted to treat UFO activities as nuclear secrets. [Visual, 2:05:16] Chapter list of the Atomic Energy Act showing SNM, TFNI, and FI acronyms [Narrator, 2:05:17] Controls like special nuclear materials, trans-classified foreign nuclear information, TFNI, non-contract foreign intelligence information, are some of the tools of the trade here. [Visual, 2:05:26] 3D model of a saucer-shaped craft under a flashlight at night [Narrator, 2:05:27] I wager, beyond a shadow of a doubt, some of OICI’s nuclear programs also see engagement with the UFO portfolio. [Visual, 2:05:35] Armed personnel exiting SUVs with blue flashing lights in the desert [Narrator, 2:05:35] And of course, we will discuss this in much greater detail in my inevitable DOE project. [Visual, 2:05:41] Document highlighting key functions of the DOE OICI [Narrator, 2:05:41] But here, I am also particularly interested in OICI’s security offices and intelligence operations center. [Visual, 2:05:49] Document highlighting the DOE Intelligence Operations Center [Narrator, 2:05:49] These systems work closely with the larger IC and White House, whilst conducting counterintelligence and insider threat support to DOE SAPs and SCIF accreditation. [Visual, 2:06:00] Scientists working with laboratory equipment and cargo transportation montage [Narrator, 2:06:00] Indeed, OICI maintains 14 field intelligence elements, FIEs, at DOE labs, facilities, and sites, and 15 counterintelligence field offices at DOE facilities worldwide. [Visual, 2:06:15] Close-up of a red padlock with LANL text [Narrator, 2:06:15] Some of these FIE sites exist at Los Alamos National Lab, Sandia National Lab, Lawrence Livermore, and Oak Ridge. [Visual, 2:06:16] Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory [Visual, 2:06:19] Sandia National Laboratories logo [Visual, 2:06:20] Aerial view of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [Visual, 2:06:21] Graphic of an abstract branching structure [Visual, 2:06:22] Static screen transition [Visual, 2:06:23] Saucer-shaped craft rising from the ground [Narrator, 2:06:23] As we discussed in part one, specifically surrounding physical security translated from the Manhattan Project onto the Manhattan Project 2.0… [Visual, 2:06:25] Diagram showing Manhattan Project security translation categories [Narrator, 2:06:30] …we discussed a series of alleged classified presidential executive orders in 1948 under Truman that vested custody of recovered NHI vehicles within AEC national laboratories, like those listed above. [Visual, 2:06:31] Black and white photo of a presidential committee meeting [Visual, 2:06:38] Vintage Sandia Laboratory logo [Visual, 2:06:41] Sandia eagle emblem [Visual, 2:06:45] Green static transition [Visual, 2:06:46] Department of Energy seal fade-in [Narrator, 2:06:46] OICI really is still an emergent piece of the puzzle to me. One that, like DOE, is interwoven into the very fabric of UFO legacy activities, but also an element exceedingly difficult to crack. [Visual, 2:06:59] DOE OICI document page number 12 [Visual, 2:07:00] Animated black and white hangar interior showing a saucer-shaped craft [Narrator, 2:07:00] Please expect much more on OICI in a future Department of Energy project. [Visual, 2:07:07] Title card “NARRATIVE CONTROL / DISINFORMATION” over Washington, D.C. scene [Visual, 2:07:13] News interview footage with “nightline” logo [Interviewer, 2:07:13] You can say categorically you’ve seen no convincing, confirmable evidence of intact spacecraft kept by the US government? [Sean Kirkpatrick, 2:07:20] No. I have seen nothing that leads me to that conclusion. [Interviewer, 2:07:24] Is it possible there is some secret program that you’re just not aware of? [Sean Kirkpatrick, 2:07:28] I don’t think so. I have access to anything and everything I need. [Visual, 2:07:33] “THE LEGACY PROGRAM” title card [Lue Elizondo, 2:07:33] The main players in the legacy program have long been the Central Intelligence Agency, the United States Air Force, the Department of Energy, and major defense contractors. [Visual, 2:07:35] Lue Elizondo speaking with organization names overlay [Visual, 2:07:45] CGI scene of a military jet and a saucer-shaped craft flying in the sky [Narrator, 2:07:45] The subject of UFO has been rife with lies, disinformation, narrative control and bizarre limited hangouts since 1947, and I do not think that is a stretch or controversial statement to say. [Visual, 2:07:58] TV scanlines static transition [Visual, 2:07:59] Photo of Richard Doty, followed by Paul Bennewitz, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, and Matt Gaetz’s interview [Narrator, 2:07:59] When one says UFO disinformation, you may immediately think of Rick Doty and Paul Bennewitz, Project Blue Book, AARO and the disgraced Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick… [Matt Gaetz, 2:08:09] I mean, I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army… [Visual, 2:08:14] Ronald Moultrie speaking at a congressional hearing [Narrator, 2:08:14] …or a litany of other intriguing and disturbing examples. [Visual, 2:08:19] Radar screen animation displaying UFO project names [Narrator, 2:08:19] But disinformation and narrative control is a paramount outer layer of the onion that has been harnessed for decades by elements of the legacy infrastructure… [Visual, 2:08:28] CNN broadcast showing an alien figure at a press conference [Narrator, 2:08:28] …all to introduce stigma around the topic, warp narratives to expose the public to a narrow field of information, and keep the US populace and lawmakers in a constant state of disbelief and confusion within the topic. [Visual, 2:08:35] Aerial view of the U.S. Capitol building at dusk [Visual, 2:08:43] Vintage clip of a man with a film reel, followed by Barack Obama, and Lue Elizondo walking by a river [Narrator, 2:08:43] Like I said, this concept extends back decades. Knowledge is power, and that couldn’t be more true in the 21st century, where multiple campaigns have been waged from within the onion to shape and limit global perception on UFOs. And these include, but are not limited to, AARO and AATIP. [Visual, 2:09:02] Lue Elizondo sitting in a room [Lue Elizondo, 2:09:02] What else do you want to know? [Visual, 2:09:03] Project Sign cover sheet document [Narrator, 2:09:03] The Air Force was tasked in 1948 by the US government to conduct the first ever investigation into UFOs, an effort called Project Sign. [Visual, 2:09:12] Project Grudge report page [Narrator, 2:09:12] Sign quickly evolved into Project Grudge in 1949, which ran until 1951, where the infamous Project Blue Book took over and ran from 1952 to 1969. [Visual, 2:09:19] Project Blue Book document pages [Visual, 2:09:25] Fighter jets taxiing with “1953 ROBERTSON PANEL” text [Narrator, 2:09:25] A massive schism occurred in these quote-unquote “official” investigations into UFOs in 1953, the Robertson Panel. [Visual, 2:09:33] Radar screen display with rotating sweep [Narrator, 2:09:33] Prior to 1953, there did seem to be some sort of transparency on this topic, and this can be perfectly observed within the words of Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, who served as the director of Project Grudge and Blue Book. [Visual, 2:09:39] Vintage footage of three men in discussion [Visual, 2:09:44] Text displaying Captain Edward J. Ruppelt’s name [Visual, 2:09:48] Photo of Captain Ruppelt and his book “The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects” [Narrator, 2:09:48] Ruppelt would state in his 1956 book, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, that he observed a memo generated in 1948 from Project Sign. This memo stated UFOs… [Visual, 2:10:00] Book cover and page from “The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects” by Edward J. Ruppelt [Narrator, 2:10:00] were of quote-unquote interplanetary origin. This memo, according to Ruppelt, was ordered for destruction by General Hoyt Vandenberg, one of the original accused members of MJ-12. [Visual, 2:10:08] Top Secret Majestic-12 document showing a list of members including Gen. Hoyt S. Vandenberg [Visual, 2:10:12] Host speaking in front of a microphone [Narrator, 2:10:12] Ruppelt is especially poignant now that Representative Burlison has called out by name and file designation AF-8-ATIC-film-0352, a briefing on film by Ruppelt titled Flying Saucer Talk. This 1952 film is held at MIT Lincoln Lab of all places, an FFRDC that is the successor to Vannevar Bush’s MIT Radiation Lab. [Visual, 2:10:18] Letter from the Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, signed by Eric Burlison [Visual, 2:10:27] Close-up of a silicon microchip wafer [Visual, 2:10:28] Lincoln Laboratory logo and text [Visual, 2:10:32] Historic Radiation Laboratory logo showing radar sweeps [Visual, 2:10:38] Interior of an electronics laboratory [Narrator, 2:10:38] Why would MIT Lincoln Labs, that was established to spearhead one of the US’s first national air defense systems, be holding such a film? And why was this film never volunteered for mandatory NARA collection? Probably because this film and others at Lincoln Lab depict sensitive and classified briefings and materials regarding non-human technical vehicles. [Visual, 2:10:39] Satellite dish outdoors under clear sky [Visual, 2:10:40] Montage of technical images with years from 2022 counting down to 1951 [Visual, 2:10:48] Man writing equations on a transparent glass board [Visual, 2:10:49] Title card “SAGE” in red, block letters [Visual, 2:10:50] A military aircraft flying with “Air defense” overlay, then lights in the sky, radar dish with “Space surveillance” overlay [Visual, 2:10:58] Man in blue shirt with laptop and tripod antenna [Visual, 2:11:00] Film countdown leading to black and white clip of a bearded man with glasses speaking [Narrator, 2:11:00] Alas, 1953 observed the Robertson Panel again, a CIA review of the Air Force’s investigations into UFOs, at that time, Blue Book. [Visual, 2:11:11] Title page of “Report of Meetings of Scientific Advisory Panel on Unidentified Flying Objects” [Narrator, 2:11:11] Obviously, as I have covered previously, Robertson Panel was given prior mandates that the conclusions of the panel at the CIA’s behest were to reduce public concern on the topic, and state that UFOs could be explained as prosaic aerial phenomena. This same playbook was harnessed with Edward Condon’s 1969 Condon Committee, which marked the end of Project Blue Book. J. Allen Hynek himself directly stated the Condon Committee outright ignored key evidence. [Visual, 2:11:21] Graphic of a black disc-shaped UFO flying over snow-covered mountains [Visual, 2:11:26] Black and white photo of Edward U. Condon [Visual, 2:11:34] Book pages titled “Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects” [Visual, 2:11:37] Portrait of J. Allen Hynek [Visual, 2:11:40] Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick sitting at a Senate hearing table writing [Narrator, 2:11:40] This playbook was again harnessed in 2022 with the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office or AARO. What was once supposed to be a joint UFO study effort called the UAP JPO or Joint Program Office was distorted and twisted, likely by the USD(I&S) at the time, Ronald Moultrie, into the mangled AARO of today. Indeed, it was none other than Mr. Ronald Moultrie, former USD(I&S), and Sean Kirkpatrick’s good buddy, that played a major role in establishing AARO and provided oversight and direction to AARO including surveillance collection and reporting, system capabilities and design, intelligence operations and analysis, mitigation and defeat, governance, and finally science and technology. Moultrie is a seasoned deep state lifer and legacy senior. I must once again ask this man why his position on the MITRE Corporation was removed from his public CV and bio. [Visual, 2:11:46] The AARO logo superimposed on Dr. Kirkpatrick [Visual, 2:11:49] Text document highlighting proposed name changes for AARO [Visual, 2:11:59] Ronald Moultrie speaking with nameplate “RONALD MOULTRIE” [Visual, 2:12:06] Ronald Moultrie speaking on a stage with hand gestures [Visual, 2:12:18] DoD press release document titled “DoD Announces the Establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office” [Visual, 2:12:31] Ronald Moultrie speaking in front of a microphone [Visual, 2:12:36] Space shuttle orbiting Earth, then MITRE logo on a smoky background [Visual, 2:12:44] Close-up of a knife slicing a red onion [Narrator, 2:12:44] To this day, AARO has operated as an extension of the onion to exponentially increase the stigma around UFOs by constant dismissal of the topic, language crafting from Susan Gough about the non-existence presence of extra-terrestrials on this planet, and most importantly, operating as a honey pot for whistleblowers. [Visual, 2:12:51] Headshot of a man with glasses and a beard [Visual, 2:12:53] Senate hearing showing a witness speaking with live broadcast graphics [Visual, 2:13:00] Speaker at a podium pointing to the left [Visual, 2:13:04] David Grusch speaking in a video interview [David Grusch, 2:13:04] I’ve tried to help. I certainly met with AARO twice as a staff member about a year ago. I actually offered to depose hostile witnesses in front of AARO leadership. They have yet to take me up on that. [Narrator, 2:13:17] When the CIA squirmed out of answering lawful interrogatives, they directed Rep Burlison and Grusch to AARO. [Visual, 2:13:18] CIA logo on a tiled floor [Visual, 2:13:25] David Grusch speaking in a video interview [David Grusch, 2:13:25] But I did offer my services. I gave them leads, etc. And, uh, actually Congress has been sending interrogatories to cabinet agencies. Something I touched on on Megyn Kelly back in, uh, January. We actually got, um, we sent interrogatories to the CIA. And the response, uh, Comer’s committee got, was, uh, from the CIA was like, ‘we are not answering any of these questions, we’ll refer you to AARO.’ And I find that very curious. I don’t know if John Ratcliffe and Michael Ellis knew that that’s what CIA’s General Counsel said back, uh, but CIA is unwilling to answer detailed questions that were obviously informed by my experience [Visual, 2:14:06] Man with glasses and beard speaking with a headset microphone, then AARO Historical Report Vol. 1 title page [Narrator, 2:14:06] Indeed, AARO has outright lied through its teeth on numerous occasions. Several examples can be seen in AARO’s historical report volume 1, where thanks to obtaining Michael Herrera’s official AARO memorandum for record, we can observe AARO blatantly lied about Herrera’s testimony, falsely stating Herrera discussed an extraterrestrial spacecraft and US Special Forces. Disgraced former Deputy Director of AARO Tim Phillips and disgraced, coward, former Director of AARO Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick have, for years, engaged in wildly inappropriate behavior, often resorting to emotional outbursts on LinkedIn for Phillips, or sending unprofessional statements to Steven Greenstreet from Kirkpatrick. Both men have leveraged ad hominem attacks and false attacks to try and discredit David Grusch. Kirkpatrick even establishing a pitiful story to paint Grusch as a villain by stating he ghosted AARO for meetings. Gosh, I wonder why. And this goes without even mentioning the egregious falsehoods outlined in ‘The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology’ article by the Wall Street Journal, in which Kirkpatrick outright lied that the whole impetus for claims around UFO legacy programs was an illegal Air Force hazing program called Yankee Blue. Hey Kirkpatrick, you told podcasters off air each branch of the Armed Forces had their own Yankee Blue equivalent. Why did you say this, and why was it never mentioned in the article or publicly? And somehow Steven Greenstreet got a copy of the Yankee Blue document, probably from Kirkpatrick, which features inaccurate security controls. So if this program was an illegal hazing ritual that tricked tens of thousands of Air Force officers for decades, there should be no problems in releasing the Yankee Blue document, right? If this is ever released, come back to this video and see whose signature is at the bottom of this report. [Visual, 2:14:15] Man in a suit with a red tie speaking at a microphone [Visual, 2:14:20] Dual page document comparison between AARO Historical Report Vol. 1 and Herrera AARO MFR [Visual, 2:14:30] A man in a black shirt speaking in front of a shelf in a room with a logo overlay “John Michael Godier’s Event Horizon” [Visual, 2:14:33] Photo of Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick with the AARO logo and American flag [Visual, 2:14:38] Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick speaking at a podium [Visual, 2:14:42] Screenshot of a LinkedIn post by Timothy Phillips [Visual, 2:14:46] Screenshot of a social media post showing Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Sean Kirkpatrick, with text “Luna and her Lunatics… It’s a disgrace to the Congress” [Visual, 2:14:51] Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick sitting at a Senate hearing table writing [Visual, 2:14:57] David Grusch testifying at a congressional hearing [Visual, 2:15:02] Split screen of Representative Mace and David Grusch testifying [Visual, 2:15:07] Wall Street Journal article titled “The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology” [Visual, 2:15:16] Close-up of hands typing on a keyboard [Visual, 2:15:17] Text of the Wall Street Journal article with highlights [Visual, 2:15:26] Man with headset microphone speaking [Visual, 2:15:38] Title slide reading “-UNACKNOWLEDGED- / YANKEE BLUE SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED” and text “ALLEGED SNIP OF YANKEE BLUE USAP DOC POSTED ON DISCORD BY STEVEN GREENSTREET” [Visual, 2:15:48] Sign welcoming visitors to Nellis Air Force Base [Visual, 2:15:50] Military vehicle firing in a desert, causing a huge explosion [Visual, 2:15:53] A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft flying in the sky [Visual, 2:15:56] Soldier aiming a machine gun from a helicopter, then close-up of a cassette tape playing [Visual, 2:16:06] Video static transition [Visual, 2:16:07] David Grusch sitting in front of a fence, speaking [Narrator, 2:16:07] On his Judicial Watch episode, David Grusch perfectly laid it out regarding Yankee Blue. [Visual, 2:16:13] Split screen of a Judicial Watch host and David Grusch speaking [David Grusch, 2:16:13] Oh yeah, and I certainly was worried about rumor and innuendo, you know, uh, hazing programs that tricked people. There’s a, you know, a narrative being spun in the media, Wall Street Journal, etc., about that kind of thing. I was well aware of hazing activities. I was guilty of said hazing activities earlier my career when I was a lieutenant and thought it was funny to make, you know, grease to freak out the the two-star general. Uh, and certainly I was already aware of that and I was calibrated to, you know, lore in the community, rumint, as we say in the intel community, [Host, 2:16:43] Right. [David Grusch, 2:16:44] and, you know, hazing activities. So the the evidentiary threshold was high, and the the people I brought to the ICIG, you know, were hands-on, they touched it, they were in the facilities, uh, and they, you know, they were well-cleared people and they they weren’t misconstruing a recovered adversarial aircraft for something else and some of that gaslighting that’s been going on, which I find, [Host, 2:17:08] Right. [David Grusch, 2:17:09] honestly amusing to see, uh, certain, you know, former career bureaucrats, you know, use the narrative that it was some Yankee Blue, uh, hazing, uh, program, and those were certainly not the code words I, you know, I provided to the ICIG and the intelligence communities. We know the right code words and we know, uh, which reported special access programs and controlled access programs were essentially covering it up and, uh, performing financial fraud, um, to hide that some of the paper trail, misappropriating funds and then taking haircuts across other black programs to funnel the money, um, uh, to to to those kind of activities to keep it off books. [Visual, 2:17:49] A young man with headphones speaking into a microphone [Narrator, 2:17:49] It is the expressed purpose of myself that deputy director of AARO following Kirkpatrick, Tim Phillips, was a quote-unquote useful idiot, and that during his tenure at AARO, Sean Kirkpatrick was partially briefed into the legacy portfolio to limit program exposure and defame David Grusch. Hey Sean, are your hands still tied? Perhaps Sean was rewarded for these un-American and illegal actions with his senior position at Oak Ridge as Chief Technology Officer for Defense and Intelligence Programs, after he fled AARO, that was mysteriously deleted from the internet. Perhaps he is continued to be rewarded now that his company, Nonlinear Solutions, LLC, is subcontracting under MITRE for US Spacecom. And Sean can’t seem to help himself but to stay engaged. To this day, emotionally lashing out using Greenstreet as a vessel whenever he gets his feelings hurt. [Visual, 2:17:51] Split screen showing two men in video calls [Visual, 2:17:58] Interview clip of two men, one in a suit, one with AARO logo [Visual, 2:18:11] Close-up of a glass plate with schematic engravings [Visual, 2:18:16] Screenshot of Sean M. Kirkpatrick’s bio at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, then a “Page Not Found” screen [Visual, 2:18:29] Website showing company information for “NONLINEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC” with a red arrow pointing to the name and a circle around “Sean M Kirkpatrick” [Visual, 2:18:32] SAM.gov website screenshots showing contract details [Visual, 2:18:36] Man with headset speaking in front of blue wall [Visual, 2:18:46] Ronald Moultrie speaking in front of microphone [Narrator, 2:18:46] We talk often about Moultrie and disgraced Kirkpatrick. But there is another culpable name here, the man who actually got Kirkpatrick employed at AARO, Mr. David M. Taylor. Taylor currently serves as the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, USD(I&S) of course, and has been in similar positions of government service for 44 years. Of all the people to choose for AARO, that was supposed to be the UAP JPO, and Taylor chose Kirkpatrick. I wonder if there are any legacy ties here. [Visual, 2:18:50] Aerial view of the Pentagon building [Visual, 2:18:56] Photo of David M. Taylor in front of the American flag [Visual, 2:18:59] Screenshot of David M. Taylor’s bio page [Visual, 2:19:10] Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick sitting at Senate hearing table [Visual, 2:19:21] Diagonal sweeping transition to a shot of a man walking near the Washington Monument [Lue Elizondo, 2:19:22] My name is Lue Elizondo. In 2009, my life changed forever. That’s when I was recruited to a highly sensitive government program that investigated unidentified aerial phenomenon, UAP, also commonly known as UFOs. [Visual, 2:19:26] Lue Elizondo speaking in a dark room with fireplace behind him, with name graphic “LUE ELIZONDO / DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICIAL (FMR.)” [Visual, 2:19:37] Aerial map view of a mountain range [Narrator, 2:19:37] Now, I must be extremely careful with the following section here. One because this is an extremely nuanced topic, and two because critics of Elizondo are often painted by the UFO community as enemies. Let me get something clear here. My mission to reveal and uncover UFO legacy programs, which have since 1947 operated [Visual, 2:19:45] Close-up of Lue Elizondo speaking [Visual, 2:19:51] Young man with headphones speaking into microphone [Visual, 2:19:57] A white cup on a dark table with steam rising in a dimly lit room [Visual, 2:20:00] A steaming cup in a dimly lit room. [Narrator, 2:20:00] in a coordinated capacity to retrieve, store and exploit non-human technical vehicles is stalwart. [Visual, 2:20:07] A profile shot of Jeremy Corbell sitting in a room with “WEAPONIZED” logo. [Narrator, 2:20:07] I stand with the whistleblower. I stand with Dylan Borland. [Visual, 2:20:11] A bearded man in a green shirt looking to the side. [Narrator, 2:20:11] I stand with Matthew Brown. And I stand with witnesses I speak, who will never go public. [Visual, 2:20:13] A black saucer-shaped craft in a hangar. [Narrator, 2:20:13] I stand with Ed. I stand with several figures that have appeared on my channel over the years [Visual, 2:20:16] Animation of a triangular craft with three glowing yellow lights. [Visual, 2:20:18] A young man wearing headphones in front of a microphone. [Narrator, 2:20:18] and most importantly of all, I stand with David Grusch. [Visual, 2:20:21] David Grusch testifying at a congressional hearing. [Narrator, 2:20:21] My entire philosophy, methodology, and approach to this topic is modeled after the bravery, courage, and leadership David Grusch has displayed since going public. [Visual, 2:20:26] NewsNation interview with David Grusch and Ross Coulthart. On-screen text reads: “WHISTLEBLOWER: ‘WE ARE NOT ALONE’“. [Visual, 2:20:35] Static noise and digital glitch screen. [Visual, 2:20:36] Two men walking down the steps of the US Capitol building at night. [Narrator, 2:20:36] But, and I need to be frank here, I do not stand with Elizondo, nor do I trust Elizondo. [Visual, 2:20:42] Lue Elizondo in an interview with NewsNation. [Narrator, 2:20:42] I believe Lue Elizondo has been a central figure for a legacy activity to speak about the onion outside of the onion, aka, a narrative control campaign. [Visual, 2:20:54] Close-up of a cassette tape playing. [Narrator, 2:20:54] And let me just say this: I am speculating here and theorizing for entertaining purposes. I don’t care to get sued, although counter-questioning would be rather intriguing. [Visual, 2:21:04] Lue Elizondo sitting in a room with wood paneling. On-screen text: “ADVANCED AEROSPACE THREAT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM” and “AATIP”. [Lue Elizondo, 2:21:04] The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, AATIP. [Visual, 2:21:10] Senator Harry Reid speaking at a podium. [Lue Elizondo, 2:21:10] The funding for this effort was sponsored by then Senate Majority Leader, Senator Harry Reid. [Visual, 2:21:14] Senator Harry Reid walking with President Barack Obama on an airfield. [Visual, 2:21:17] Profile view of Lue Elizondo. [Lue Elizondo, 2:21:17] And together, myself, Jay Stratton, and our team, for nearly a decade, investigated UAP incidents around the world. [Visual, 2:21:24] Lue Elizondo sitting in a chair in the wood-paneled room. [Narrator, 2:21:24] In 2025’s Age of Disclosure, film protagonist Elizondo lies incessantly about the structure of AAWSAP, the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Application Program, and AATIP. [Visual, 2:21:30] On-screen text: “AAWSAP” and “ADVANCED AEROSPACE WEAPONS SYSTEM APPLICATION PROGRAM”. [Visual, 2:21:35] On-screen text: “AATIP” and “ADVANCED AEROSPACE THREAT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM”. [Visual, 2:21:37] A modern glass office building, followed by the Defense Intelligence Agency flag. [Narrator, 2:21:37] AAWSAP out of the Defense Intelligence Agency, DIA, ran from 2008 to 2012, and did indeed have a budget of $22 million. [Visual, 2:21:43] Sign for the Defense Intelligence Agency. [Visual, 2:21:47] David Grusch on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast. [Narrator, 2:21:47] And as David Grusch stated on Rogan, one of the expressed missions of this program was to operate as the recipient of the Kona Blue DHS PSAP transfer, prospective special access program of UFO materials from Lockheed Martin. [Visual, 2:21:52] Declassified “KONA BLUE” document from Homeland Security. [Visual, 2:22:01] The US Capitol dome, with “AATIP” and “AAWSAP” separated by a red “X”. [Narrator, 2:22:01] AATIP is not AAWSAP. AATIP was nothing more than an informal working group that was unfunded. This is common knowledge, of course, but I will go a step further. [Visual, 2:22:04] Lue Elizondo sitting inside a subway car. [Visual, 2:22:07] Lue Elizondo walking in a modern glass hallway. [Visual, 2:22:13] The US Capitol building at night. [Narrator, 2:22:13] AATIP was an informal working group that was a literal cover for several National Security Council activities that wished to speak about the onion outside of the onion. And who gave this top cover? James Clapper. [Visual, 2:22:15] Seal of the Executive Office of the President of the United States. [Visual, 2:22:22] James Clapper speaking in an interview. [Visual, 2:22:25] Matt Ford sitting on the “Good Trouble Show” set. [Narrator, 2:22:25] And Matt Ford actually asked this to Lue on Matt’s show. Watch now how Lue dodges this question, and I do recommend watching this full interview by Matt. It’s really good. [Visual, 2:22:35] Split-screen interview between Matt Ford and Lue Elizondo. [Matt Ford, 2:22:35] So, so my understanding of it was that it was in, AATIP in a, in certain aspects of it were to essentially you had factions within the legacy program, factions that felt, you know, “We need to let some of this out.” And part of one of the elements of AATIP was to sort of peel away some of the, the, the layers of the onion. But this was done in coordination with the Obama administration. This was part of, part of a, something that came out of, out of the National Security Council and in particular, James, James Clapper. So, can you speak to that and, and again, were you ever or are you part of the legacy program? [Visual, 2:23:25] Lue Elizondo speaking in front of a studio microphone. [Lue Elizondo, 2:23:25] Well, I, I worked with Jim Clapper. Actually, I worked for Jim Clapper, as a lot of people know. Uh, when he was the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, after he was the director there at, at DIA, but before he was the Director of National Intelligence. Um, and I can’t speak for, for Jim. Um, he would have to answer that. But I will tell you, at least when he was, uh, when I spoke to him, he was very, uh, happy, um, and that we had a UAP program, um, in, in the department. Um, now, that doesn’t mean anything. If you ask him now, he may be, (chuckles) think otherwise. Um, but that’s certainly up to director, former Director Clapper to, to, to opine about. Um, as far as, where did this come from, from Obama, um, I never sat with Obama specifically about this topic, uh, or, or any other topic. I, my, my, my, my entrée point was through the National Security Council for the programs that I was running, um, in the special access world. Um, unfortunately, I probably wouldn’t be able to elaborate too much on how that relationship works. Um, there is an established channel of communication that was between my office and, and that office. Uh, but much beyond that, I wouldn’t be able to really provide any, any fidelity to. Um, you know, we, especially, not just with classified information, but special access programs. There’s a huge sensitivity there. And, especially when you’re talking about SAPs, in some cases, and by the way, I’m not saying this is one of them, um, if they’re unacknowledged, right? That’s, that’s even, that’s even more sensitive. So, um, boy, I don’t know how to answer that question. It’s a good question, um, [Visual, 2:25:04] A man with a white beard sitting in a dark room. [Narrator, 2:25:04] So in Age of Disclosure, when you listen to Stratton and Elizondo speak on AATIP, as if it were a real working program with appropriations, and see individuals like Puthoff and Davis labeled as AATIP scientists, this is brazen nonsense. [Visual, 2:25:09] A blurry shot of lights outside a window at night. [Visual, 2:25:12] Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis sitting in a library. On-screen text labels them as AATIP scientists. [Visual, 2:25:16] A gray metal door with a small window in a hallway. [Visual, 2:25:19] Lue Elizondo speaking in a NewsNation interview. [Narrator, 2:25:19] The primary operational years for AATIP were around 2009 to 2017, primarily when James Clapper was Director of National Intelligence, and Mr. Elizondo operated as the director of the National Programs Special Management Staff, NPMS. [Visual, 2:25:21] Ross Coulthart sitting in a chair. [Visual, 2:25:25] James Clapper speaking at a panel. On-screen text lists his titles. [Visual, 2:25:28] Lue Elizondo walking across the street in Washington, D.C. [Visual, 2:25:30] On-screen text reads: “DIRECTOR, NATIONAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL MANAGEMENT STAFF (2013-2017)“. [Visual, 2:25:35] Seal of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. [Narrator, 2:25:35] NPMS director operates under the USD(I) and S, of course, also Clapper’s former position from 2007 to 2010. I’m sure there’s no crossover here. And NPMS director runs coordination between National Security Council SAPs and the DoD/IC. [Visual, 2:25:47] Venn diagram showing the role of the NPMS Director coordinating between NSC SAPs and DoD/IC. [Visual, 2:25:54] A group of soldiers marching in a field. [Narrator, 2:25:54] As I stated earlier, the director of NPMS is usually the most cleared person in the entire DoD, besides the Secretary of Defense, even more cleared than the director of DoD SAPCO. [Visual, 2:25:55] A soldier aiming a machine gun in a forest. [Visual, 2:25:56] A stealth bomber flying in the clouds. [Visual, 2:25:57] Soldiers walking, viewed through a circular aperture. [Visual, 2:25:58] Close-up of jet engines firing. [Visual, 2:25:59] A soldier firing a heavy machine gun from a vehicle. [Visual, 2:26:00] A military helicopter landing on an aircraft carrier. [Visual, 2:26:01] A soldier running through a field with smoke. [Visual, 2:26:02] A fleet of naval ships in the ocean. [Visual, 2:26:03] Soldiers carrying a boat on a beach at night. [Visual, 2:26:04] A military jet flying in the sky. [Visual, 2:26:05] Soldiers riding in a speed boat on the water. [Visual, 2:26:06] A soldier in camouflage gear walking through the forest. [Visual, 2:26:07] On-screen text: “AATIP” and “ADVANCED AEROSPACE THREAT IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM”. [Narrator, 2:26:07] With this comes the baggage that even outside the AATIP NSC cover activity, Lue, either prior to NPMS position or during NPMS position, operated directly under or within the legacy programs. I, once again, echo this sentiment from Corbell. [Visual, 2:26:13] A figure in a hazmat suit inspecting a crashed saucer-shaped object at night. [Visual, 2:26:21] Jeremy Corbell sitting in his studio. [Visual, 2:26:25] Jeremy Corbell speaking in front of a safe. [Jeremy Corbell, 2:26:25] Yeah, so David Grusch talked again, and I was really glad he decided to because he’s not all over the media. I, I do think that he has a difference of opinion, and that’s for him to talk about, um, when it comes to this stuff. You know, he really thinks everybody should just open up and say what they know. For example, he thinks that if Lue Elizondo was part of the legacy UFO program, that he should just say it. Go out on the limb and just say it. [Visual, 2:26:52] James Clapper speaking at a podium. [Narrator, 2:26:52] But AATIP, although Clapper or his superior’s true motives for such an activity are unknown, well, AATIP sought to conduct a partial disclosure campaign and establish Hillary Clinton as the disclosure president. [Visual, 2:26:58] Hillary Clinton speaking at a podium. [Visual, 2:27:06] A view of Earth from space. [Narrator, 2:27:06] These disclosures would have seen a huge emphasis on UFOs existing as a national security threat, revelations of an amorphous non-human presence on this planet, and the general discussion that we are not alone on this planet. These disclosures, however, would not have featured crash retrieval, reverse engineering, exploitation, NHI taxonomy, and of course, the revelations of the legacy programs. [Visual, 2:27:12] Blurry footage of a small dark object flying through clouds. [Visual, 2:27:20] A metallic saucer-shaped craft inside a hangar. [Visual, 2:27:32] David Grusch testifying. [Narrator, 2:27:32] Indeed, prior to David Grusch coming forward, Elizondo would essentially only discuss crash retrievals in reference to Roswell, which of course at this point is a cultural zeitgeist event and a well-known cover-up. No harm, I guess, in discussing one single crash retrieval event 70 years ago at the time, especially if you never mention the custodianship of the wreckage. [Visual, 2:27:35] Lue Elizondo sitting in a room. [Visual, 2:27:39] Newspaper clipping about the Roswell incident. [Visual, 2:27:42] Newspaper clipping about the Roswell weather balloon explanation. [Visual, 2:27:45] Newspaper clipping with General Ramey’s statement. [Visual, 2:27:50] Newspaper clipping text: “DISK PROVES AIR DEVICE”. [Visual, 2:27:52] Newspaper clipping mentioning Major Jesse Marcel. [Visual, 2:27:55] A presenter speaking at an SCU conference with a slide titled “AATIP SESSION FOCUS”. [Narrator, 2:27:55] Indeed, after Dave Grusch went public in full kimono, Lue’s crew was forced to reposture and discuss crash retrieval events and the legacy programs. This is extremely evident in the 2024 UAP hearings where Elizondo seems rather caught off guard and nervous, compared to his usual interviews in which he can talk circles around really answering questions. [Visual, 2:28:04] Lue Elizondo testifying at a congressional hearing. [Visual, 2:28:17] Representative Nancy Mace speaking at a congressional hearing. [Representative Nancy Mace, 2:28:17] Okay, Mr. Elizondo, you state in your testimony that, quote, “Advanced technologies not by our government, or any other government, are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe,” end quote. If these technologies are not made by any government, who’s making them? Private companies, or are you implying they are crafted by a non-human intelligence? [Visual, 2:28:38] Lue Elizondo testifying. [Lue Elizondo, 2:28:38] Well, ma’am, that’s precisely why we’re here. Uh, the problem is that temporally speaking over decades, not just the last 10 years, before, to put this in perspective, when we… [Representative Nancy Mace, 2:28:47] Are these private companies you’re implying, or is this a non-human intelligence? [Lue Elizondo, 2:28:51] It may be both. Uh, when it comes to blue force technologies, I would not be able to discuss that, ma’am, in this setting. [Representative Nancy Mace, 2:28:54] Okay. Are you read into secret UAP crash retrieval programs? [Lue Elizondo, 2:28:58] Um, we would have to have a conversation in a closed session, ma’am. I signed documentation three years ago that restricts my ability to discuss specifically crash retrievals. [Visual, 2:29:08] A finger pressing the rewind button on a cassette player. [Narrator, 2:29:08] But let’s quickly back up here, as Elizondo, Mellon, General Neil McCasland, John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, and others, used one specific vessel through which Lue executed AATIP’s mission. And this was through Tom DeLonge and To the Stars Academy. [Visual, 2:29:11] Close-up of Lue Elizondo. [Visual, 2:29:12] General Neil McCasland speaking at a podium. [Visual, 2:29:14] John Podesta appearing on Fox News Sunday. [Visual, 2:29:18] A dark saucer-shaped craft in a swirling field. [Visual, 2:29:23] Tom DeLonge speaking in front of city lights at night. [Visual, 2:29:26] The Jefferson Memorial at night. [Tom DeLonge, 2:29:27] I recognized that there were people in government that wanted to engage the public on topics that unfortunately had a stigma, even though they were based in scientific fact. At the time, there was no mechanism for them to do this. Through a series of meetings, I was soon connected to a large group of U.S. government officials, from the CIA, the Department of Defense, and Lockheed Martin Skunk Works. These guys were the ones involved in the secret of U.S. government programs that dealt with these subjects, and they have all taken tremendous risks to themselves and their reputations to do something that can benefit the world. They wanted to be a part of something special. [Visual, 2:29:28] A man holding a camera, filming the Lincoln Memorial. [Visual, 2:29:30] A film crew setting up an interview in a grand room. [Visual, 2:29:32] A man looking through a spotting scope in a mountainous area. [Visual, 2:29:33] Close-up of a fluted column. [Visual, 2:29:34] Reflection of the Lincoln Memorial in the reflecting pool. [Visual, 2:29:35] The US Capitol building dome at night. [Visual, 2:29:36] The White House at night. [Visual, 2:29:38] A silhouette of a man looking out a window at night. [Visual, 2:29:40] A man opening an old wooden door with an arched window. [Visual, 2:29:41] A man working at a computer in a dark room. [Visual, 2:29:43] Seal of the Central Intelligence Agency. [Visual, 2:29:44] Seal of the Department of Defense. [Visual, 2:29:45] Seal of Lockheed Martin Skunk Works. [Visual, 2:29:47] A panel of men sitting on a stage under a quote from Mark Twain. [Visual, 2:29:50] Tom DeLonge walking onto the stage to join the panel. [Visual, 2:29:52] Tom DeLonge speaking at a podium. [Visual, 2:29:54] Silhouette of a man opening window blinds. [Visual, 2:29:56] A man in a hat walking onto a cabin balcony. [Visual, 2:29:57] A man in a blue shirt talking on a cell phone on a balcony. [Visual, 2:29:58] A man in a suit walking in a dark room. [Visual, 2:29:59] A man in a suit walking past a computer screen. [Visual, 2:30:00] Luis Elizondo speaking on stage [Tom DeLonge, 2:30:00] to be a part of a company that could not only change the way we see ourselves, but also change the path humanity is on. [Visual, 2:30:01] CNN broadcast clip of a UFO video, titled “Intel official who ran gov’t’s secret UFO unit speaks out” [Visual, 2:30:04] Silhouette of a person looking at the sky at sunset [Visual, 2:30:07] Title graphic: “TO THE STARS… ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCE” [Narrator, 2:30:07] I have spoken at length about the quandary that is To The Stars Academy, in which DeLonge, Elizondo, Mellon, Podesta, Hal Puthoff, Major General Neil McCasland, Major General Michael Carey, Lockheed Skunk Works Executive Vice President Rob Weiss, all banded together for a slow disclosure campaign. [Visual, 2:30:11] Photos of Tom DeLonge, Luis Elizondo, Chris Mellon, John Podesta, Hal Puthoff, Neil McCasland, Michael Carey, and Rob Weiss [Visual, 2:30:22] CGI animation of a UFO flying and crashing into the hills [Visual, 2:30:25] Document pages titled “UAP/Project Forum in California” [Narrator, 2:30:25] I have also discussed several times how Elizondo’s AATIP direction of such an idea was likely an evolution of Project Forum, as outlined in the BAASS Ten Month Report, which was described as disclosure efforts through popular zeitgeist figures. [Visual, 2:30:33] Document cover page: “BAASS Ten Month Report” [Visual, 2:30:36] Report pages highlighting sections like “Sponsors of Disclosure” and “Collation of a database of Project Forum events” [Visual, 2:30:40] Video of Tom DeLonge in front of a bookshelf [Narrator, 2:30:40] And guys, this is not a knock at Tom. I personally love Tom. I believe Elizondo and others parasitically attached themselves to his curiosity on the topic. [Visual, 2:30:45] Silhouette of a person on a balcony at night [Visual, 2:30:46] Silhouette of a person walking in a room [Visual, 2:30:47] Luis Elizondo speaking on stage [Visual, 2:30:49] CNN clip of Luis Elizondo [Narrator, 2:30:51] Indeed in my NRO project, I theorized Elizondo even disclosed elements of the Immaculate Constellation USAP to DeLonge. Specifically surrounding episodic visits, and foreknowledge of UFO events, as outlined in the IMCON reports. [Visual, 2:30:51] Satellite in orbit over Earth [Visual, 2:30:57] Logo: “NRO National Reconnaissance Office” [Visual, 2:30:59] Document pages zooming in on “Section 3: Defense Human Intelligence Reporting” with highlights [Visual, 2:31:07] Tom DeLonge speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast [Tom DeLonge, 2:31:07] You know, you have people at the National Reconnaissance Office that have a perspective based on the satellite feeds they’re getting and these things are coming in and out of the atmosphere. Then you also have people from the agency that are worried about and collecting information of what’s going on with people in different countries and here. But then you also have, you know, engineers that have a perspective on how the technology is made and what that might mean because there’s a lot of consciousness stuff that falls in this category. [Visual, 2:31:34] Joe Rogan on his podcast [Joe Rogan, 2:31:33] Can I stop you right there? So, there’s satellites that track them coming in and out of the atmosphere? [Tom DeLonge, 2:31:38] Absolutely, yeah. Absolutely. [Joe Rogan, 2:31:40] What kind of satellites are these? [Tom DeLonge, 2:31:43] Uh, how would I, I don’t know, usually forward-looking infrared. But I don’t know what spectrum of the infrared they’re looking at. [Joe Rogan, 2:31:49] So, there’s some sort of a camera or some sort of a detection device that they have in the atmosphere just to check for UFOs? [Tom DeLonge, 2:31:57] I don’t know if it’s just for UFOs. They can pick up very, very specific heat signatures, and they have algorithms because what you have is a device… a satellite is a device that can pick up what you, what you program it to pick up. Now, you know, you put a sensor on there, but you got to tell the sensor what to do. [Joe Rogan, 2:32:16] Right. [Tom DeLonge, 2:32:16] So, if the sensor says, “Look, something traveling at this speed with this kind of heat,” you know, you got to record that, you got to focus on it, and that, that’s what we call an ICBM. But if something comes in and zigzags, stops, and turns left, and is traveling ten times faster than that, we need you to record that and focus in on that as well. But if something just is moving low and it’s only going 300 miles an hour and it has these big wings and a low whatever, they’re like, “That’s just a plane.” You know, so the, what it captures is based on, you know, how it’s programmed in the first place. But, yeah… [Joe Rogan, 2:32:46] So, it can differentiate between meteorites and space junk? [Tom DeLonge, 2:32:49] Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. So… [Joe Rogan, 2:32:51] So, how often are these things coming into our atmosphere? [Tom DeLonge, 2:32:54] Oh, I don’t know. But I, I’ve had quite a few discussions. Um, one of the people I, I’ve been, I’ve been in contact… uh, one, one of my advisors was from the National Reconnaissance Office, high up, high, high, high up. And, um, they call it episodic visits, that’s all I know. [Joe Rogan, 2:33:10] Episodic meaning like they have time periods where they, like… [Tom DeLonge, 2:33:14] There was, I saw a paper, uh, where they, semesters, I figured out, um, the Department of Defense figured out… a physicist there, an algorithm of how to compute when the things fly in and collect smaller ship. Like mother ships, small ships, what, what at what longitude and latitude, and, uh, and what essentially what orbit it would land at when it would collect these other machines. And, um, so they tested that, and all I know is it was successful. [Visual, 2:33:41] Hillary Clinton speaking at a podium [Narrator, 2:33:41] Ultimately, Hillary Clinton wasn’t elected. TTSA failed. McCasland got a slap on the wrist, and Lue was forced to reposture. [Visual, 2:33:44] Logo: To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science [Visual, 2:33:45] Neil McCasland speaking [Visual, 2:33:47] Luis Elizondo speaking on NewsNation [Narrator, 2:33:50] You would think after the failures of TTSA in the early 2020s, before which Lue actually quote-unquote “left” his position as director of AATIP to shortly join TTSA in 2017, that this limited disclosure effort would be disbanded. But seemingly, it is alive and thriving, but evolved and morphed. Enter Age of Disclosure. [Visual, 2:33:55] On-screen text: “2017 - ‘LEFT’ FEDERAL SERVICE” over the globe [Visual, 2:33:58] On-screen text: “OCTOBER 2017 - JOINED TTSA” [Visual, 2:34:01] Washington D.C. map with blue connection lines [Visual, 2:34:09] Title text: “THE AGE OF DISCLOSURE” [Visual, 2:34:12] Photo of a man in military gear in Afghanistan [Luis Elizondo, 2:34:12] And it was later in my career that I actually began running special access programs for the U.S. government, and in some cases reported directly to the White House and the National Security Council. [Visual, 2:34:13] Luis Elizondo profile [Visual, 2:34:17] The White House at night [Visual, 2:34:19] Luis Elizondo standing with an older man in a suit [Visual, 2:34:21] James Clapper speaking at a panel next to Luis Elizondo [Narrator, 2:34:21] The nerve to include Clapper in Age of Disclosure is one thing. But the documentary serving basically as an amnesty plea and misdirect on the legacy program structure is downright insulting to me. [Visual, 2:34:25] Close-up of a cassette tape playing [Visual, 2:34:32] Danny Jones podcast studio setup [Narrator, 2:34:32] And this isn’t a dig at Dan Farrah, the film’s director, or the quality of the documentary. But the staunch criticism towards Elizondo and Stratton, who are bizarrely still protecting Clapper, the National Security Council, and pushing for limited disclosures. [Visual, 2:34:38] Luis Elizondo walking with a man in a white shirt [Visual, 2:34:40] Jay Stratton sitting in an armchair [Visual, 2:34:47] David Grusch speaking in a video interview with certificates on the wall [David Grusch, 2:34:47] It is true. It does get a little lonely in, in, in this subject. Brings out a lot of charlatans, a lot of people who want attention, or a lot of people who want to generate certain narratives. I’m just here to do a job, and to get this information out to the American public. And I would love to go back to my normal life. I live in, in Colorado, and I rather just ATV and hike with my dogs, and not have to deal with this, you know, on the public stage. I never wanted to be a public personality, I have no book deal, unlike other people in this space, and I’ll write a book, I promise I’ll write a book [laughs] after this is all over. It’ll be my leadership meditations. [Visual, 2:35:23] Film countdown card showing number “12” and text “BE HERE” [Narrator, 2:35:23] My greatest critique of the film, as I have been oh so outspoken of, is the structure of the legacy program Elizondo and others portray. [Visual, 2:35:27] Organizational chart diagram titled “THE LEGACY PROGRAM” showing CIA, Department of Energy, Defense Contractors, and United States Air Force [Visual, 2:35:32] Entrance door of a concrete bunker facility at twilight [Narrator, 2:35:32] The film states the legacy program, singular, is spearheaded by the CIA DS&T or Directorate of Science & Technology, within which the DS&T deputy director is the big, bad, mob boss of the program. [Visual, 2:35:36] CIA Directorate of Science & Technology seal, labeled “DIRECTOR CIA DS&T” [Visual, 2:35:45] DS&T seal with lines connecting to DOE, DIB PRIMES, and Air Force seals [Narrator, 2:35:45] Below DS&T on equal playing fields sits the DOE, Air Force, and contractors. [Visual, 2:35:51] A red “X” overlays the legacy program chart [Narrator, 2:35:51] This is demonstrably false on so many levels, and you don’t have to get into the details as I do on here. [Visual, 2:35:54] Danny Jones sitting in a recording studio [Visual, 2:35:58] A flying saucer UFO inside a glass-walled hangar laboratory [Narrator, 2:35:57] But I will not for one second believe this outline was crafted to translate the legacy programs to a general audience. [Visual, 2:36:04] James Clapper speaking [Narrator, 2:36:04] No, I do believe such an organizational chart was generated to both protect Lue and Stratton’s legacy friends, and dictate who gets to catch the live hand grenade when and if disclosure comes. [Visual, 2:36:11] Entrance lobby floor with the seal of the Central Intelligence Agency [Visual, 2:36:17] A pyramid diagram showing DOD/IC Admin, FFRDC, Contractors [Narrator, 2:36:17] I won’t go into too much detail, but as we know here, the DOE is baked into every single layer of the legacy structure, not beholden to the agency. [Visual, 2:36:21] Seal of the US Department of Energy [Visual, 2:36:27] A stealth aircraft in a hangar [Narrator, 2:36:27] We know that defense industrial base prime contractors, besides the ones that broke free to use IRAD to start their own programs in 2005, are the lowest level of the totem pole. [Visual, 2:36:30] A man walking inside the hangar [Visual, 2:36:32] A man wearing sunglasses [Visual, 2:36:35] Labeled: “NORTHROP GRUMMAN” logo [Visual, 2:36:37] Legacy Program diagram showing “DEFENSE CONTRACTORS” at the bottom [Narrator, 2:36:37] Where is the Army? Where is the Navy? Where is the Office of Naval Intelligence, Jay Stratton? Where are five of the other big six intelligence agencies? Where’s the DIA? Where are the FFRDCs, national labs, and UARCs? [Visual, 2:36:52] A stealth plane model hanging in an office lobby [Narrator, 2:36:52] As it goes without saying, agency is not the UFO portfolio lead, though of course it has played a major, major role throughout history. [Visual, 2:37:03] David Grusch testifying in front of Congress, labeled “Mr. Grusch” [Narrator, 2:37:03] Indeed, the program activity lead, as David Grusch recently stated, has often rotated for program purposes. Where administrative components to legacy operations often exist in a flat hierarchy with a very fractured and loose top dog control group. [Visual, 2:37:09] Three grain silos at sunset [Visual, 2:37:18] Split-screen video showing Tom Fitton (left) and David Grusch (right) during a Judicial Watch interview [David Grusch, 2:37:18] That’s a part of their program protection strategy where they do, they do rotate things, and that’s the same thing with how they hide this program based on time epochs and who they trust, career civil servants, career senior executives in industry, they rotate it and it’s, there’s no, they randomized the schema too, it’s not like this one guy in this one DOD office always gets it. They spread it across and it’s just like rule by committee, flat hierarchy, and that’s how they bounce… And I’ve seen that in conventional programs that, that weren’t reported to Congress as well, it has nothing to do with the subject, the way they just will hide things and, and make a program that’s not technically a department. I will, I will tell you all that stuff. [Tom Fitton, 2:37:58] I will tell you all that stuff. [Visual, 2:38:00] Diagram adding “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL” above “CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY” [Narrator, 2:38:00] Why in this organizational chart is the National Security Council missing above the DS&T? Because this portfolio out of the US government is indeed run by the NSC. [Visual, 2:38:06] A black stealth aircraft in a hangar [Visual, 2:38:11] James Clapper speaking [Narrator, 2:38:10] Oh, that’s right, probably to protect Clapper and Lue’s old AATIP interests. [Visual, 2:38:17] Luis Elizondo sitting at a congressional hearing table, labeled “Mr. Elizondo” [Narrator, 2:38:17] Many, many questions still remain about Lue. What was his and Clapper’s motive for the AATIP cover program that served a partial disclosure campaign initiative? [Visual, 2:38:26] A flying saucer UFO inside a dark hangar [Narrator, 2:38:25] What is Lue’s true background within the legacy programs? [Visual, 2:38:29] Luis Elizondo looking to the side, labeled “THE LEGACY PROGRAM” [Narrator, 2:38:29] Why is Lue still protecting individuals and misleading in the Age of Disclosure? [Visual, 2:38:35] A knife slicing a red onion [Narrator, 2:38:35] Though it may not seem like it, both AARO and Elizondo through AATIP are two elements of the legacy program onion, systems to offer disinformation and egregious narrative control. [Visual, 2:38:42] Portrait of Sean Kirkpatrick, labeled “Sean Kirkpatrick, Director, All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO)” [Visual, 2:38:46] The narrator speaking in front of a wood paneled wall [Narrator, 2:38:46] And guys, although this section may have been harsh, I do need to state I am beholden to my mission of uncovering and exploring the legacy programs. Again, I stand with the whistleblower, but I do not trust Mr. Elizondo nor the AATIP initiative. [Visual, 2:38:56] David Grusch testifying in Congress [Visual, 2:38:58] Luis Elizondo sitting on steps outside a building with white columns [Visual, 2:39:03] Fading to black screen [Visual, 2:39:05] Text on black background: “UNRIVALED SECRECY” followed by a red circular radar sweep [Narrator, 2:39:10] As we begin to finally wrap up our investigation into the secrecy apparatus behind UFO legacy programs, we will end our discussion with the concept of unrivaled secrecy. [Visual, 2:39:21] CGI of a stealth jet flying alongside a large triangular spaceship with lights at night [Narrator, 2:39:21] Various methods, operations, activities, and systems that legacy programs utilize to stay hidden, that we could quantify as discrete or minor layers within our legacy onion. Critical secrecy mechanisms to discuss that won’t feature their own section, but tie in intimately to major disclosure points within our two-part investigation. [Visual, 2:39:32] CGI of a silver flying saucer hovering over a bright light on the ground [Visual, 2:39:41] CGI representation of a green glowing circuit board [Visual, 2:39:42] Night cityscape of Washington D.C. with blue connections [Narrator, 2:39:42] Obviously, as we discuss today, legacy programs utilize content-only SAPs to waive any and all carve-out reporting requirements. These SAPs contain CPI-only and feature no budget. Indeed, budget for such SAPs can be rolled into generic DOD… [Visual, 2:39:46] Bold text overlay: “CONTENT ONLY SAP: - SAP that protects discrete CPI, - Information only w/ no associated funding or generalized funding line” [Visual, 2:39:51] Piles of $100 bills moving on screen [Visual, 2:39:56] Document page titled “Government SAP Security Officer (GSSO)” highlighting the word “CARVEOUT” [Visual, 2:40:00] Document page titled “AFI16-701 18 FEBRUARY 2014” showing “Code Word” and “Content-only” definition highlighted in yellow. [Narrator, 2:40:00] … Armed Forces, its sector budgets. And we discussed as such with Air Force Acquisition SAF/AQ. [Visual, 2:40:06] Split screen of Judicial Watch interview with David Fitton and David Grusch. [David Grusch, 2:40:07] Because we know the right code words and we know, uh, which reported Special Access Programs and Controlled Access Programs were essentially covering it up in a, uh, performing financial fraud, um, to hide, uh, some of the paper trail, misappropriating funds and then taking haircuts across other black programs to funnel the money, um, uh, to, to those kind of activities to keep it off-books. [Visual, 2:40:32] Congressional hearing with David Grusch testifying. [Narrator, 2:40:32] Thanks to the sage counsel of David Grusch, alongside the practice of making a White House Special Access Program non-covert to waive reporting requirements with content-only SAP application, we know that legacy programs have harnessed several methods of misappropriation of funds to keep legacy program records off-books. [Visual, 2:40:34] CGI animation of a spacecraft orbiting Earth with text “50 USC § 3093 WH SAP” and lines indicating “WAIVES ALL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS”. [Visual, 2:40:43] Dollar values scrolling over a landscape. [Visual, 2:40:51] Narrator sitting in a podcast studio speaking to the camera. [Narrator, 2:40:51] My guesses, educated guesses might I add here, for programs that get such haircuts that funnel into legacy would include USFS, or US Forest Service, BLM, Bureau of Land Management, and other obscure offices one would not immediately expect. [Visual, 2:40:57] CGI of a disc-shaped UFO in a hangar, with logos of US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. [Visual, 2:41:09] Aerial view of a pine forest with a green dollar sign symbol, then showing an arrow from the USFS logo to a red X over a picture of a mountain lake, with text “LEGACY PORTFOLIO”. [Narrator, 2:41:09] A specific example here would be forest management money passing through USFS, but is ultimately diverted towards the crash retrieval portfolio. [Visual, 2:41:18] Hands cutting a blue fabric with scissors, then a control tower at sunset, then a drone with text “IRAD/IR&D - INDEPENDENT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT”. [Narrator, 2:41:18] Alongside program haircuts, we also know that IRAD, or Independent Research & Development, has been a method for legacy funding. [Visual, 2:41:27] Congressional hearing with Representative Moskowitz questioning David Grusch. [Rep. Moskowitz, 2:41:27] Well, so that had, I mean, I don’t want to cut you off, but how does a program like that get funded? [David Grusch, 2:41:32] I will give you generalities, I can get very specific in a closed session, uh, but misappropriation of funds and, uh, self-funding. [Rep. Moskowitz, 2:41:40] Does that mean, does that mean that there is money in the budget that is set to go to a program, but it doesn’t, and it goes to something else? [David Grusch, 2:41:46] Yes, I have specific knowledge of that, yep. [Rep. Moskowitz, 2:41:48] Do you think US corporations are overcharging for certain tech they’re selling to the US government, and that additional money is going to programs? [David Grusch, 2:41:56] Correct, through something called IRAD. [Visual, 2:41:58] Inside a military aircraft hangar filled with jets and drones. [Narrator, 2:41:58] Of course, one of the major investigations in my Northrop 2 project was exploring how Northrop and other contractors essentially began their own breakaway UFO retrieval and exploitation activities in 2005, that featured little to no reporting to their original government handler. [Visual, 2:42:01] A woman enters an elevator, looking back and smiling, elevator doors close showing “NORTHROP GRUMMAN” logo. [Visual, 2:42:05] A dark blue screen with yellow lights representing a triangular UFO, followed by the CIA seal. [Visual, 2:42:15] Two people shaking hands in a futuristic interface, then three pages of a document titled “Yellowfruit”. [Narrator, 2:42:15] Further covert funding mechanisms for legacy programs likely include self-funded cutout activities. And we’ve actually seen this in part one with the Yellowfruit Army SAP, in which Lieutenant Colonel Duncan staged his retirement from the US Army to operate Yellowfruit activities through a quote-unquote private consulting cutout called BSI. [Visual, 2:42:35] Vintage video showing “LTV Aerospace” logo and an older gentleman in a suit presenting a diagram. [Narrator, 2:42:35] Additionally, I have talked in that sense at length about LTV Aerospace and their involvement in legacy architecture. LTV would evolve into E-Systems, a CIA cutout. I’m sure there are several other covert funding schemes to hide legacy financial books, such as private capital and drug trafficking, but alas, the above mechanisms I do have specific knowledge on. [Visual, 2:42:48] Animation of dollar signs forming a sphere, then a CGI model of a triangular UFO flying over a desert at night. [Visual, 2:43:00] Fox News show “The Big Weekend Show” with a panel of hosts on the left and David Grusch on the right via video link. On-screen text reads “TRUTH IS OUT THERE / PENTAGON RELEASES NEW BATCH OF DECLASSIFIED UFO FILES”. [Fox News Host, 2:43:00] David, I want to ask you about recent allegations you’ve made accusing intel agencies of hiding billions of dollars in secret government spending from Congress. I mean, we know about, uh, Air America, you know, CIA’s done stuff like that, even Iran-Contra, so we’ve seen this happen before. It’s not, you know, it’s not aliens, it’s what our government does, but tell us what you know about that. [Visual, 2:43:03] Camera moves over the CIA seal on the floor of a lobby, with on-screen text “OFF THE BOOKS / WHISTLEBLOWER ACCUSES INTEL AGENCIES OF HIDING BILLIONS”. [David Grusch, 2:43:23] Yeah, certainly. Earlier in my career I was a counter-threat finance analyst. I actually worked in a special cell looking at arms trafficking and terrorist funding, so I have that background in, in counter-finance. And what I found was there were haircuts taken to classified black programs, uh, to fund this. There was also self-funding, uh, cutout companies, if you’re familiar, and you mentioned Iran-Contra, and they had cutout companies, um, self-funding some of the arms purchases, uh, for the Contras, uh, but also, uh, criminal enterprises, unfortunately, is kind of the third way I saw laundering money. And I actually bumped into a very serious criminal enterprise, and, and all that information was actually reported to, uh, Department of Justice, and it led to, um, some federal investigations and things I can’t mention now. But, uh, uh, the DOJ is actually handling that now because I bumped into a, uh, government-run, uh, criminal enterprise that was siphoning money, uh, for this topic as well to pay for kind of the, the crash retrieval operations off-books. [Visual, 2:43:25] David Grusch speaking in front of a mountain background backdrop, with overlay showing “DAVID GRUSCH | UAP WHISTLEBLOWER”. [Visual, 2:44:24] CGI of a silver saucer UFO taking off from a desert hangar and flying, then being lifted by a crane onto a flatbed truck at night. [Narrator, 2:44:24] And make no mistake, the secrecy behind funding legacy programs is not discrete or minor within our onion analogy. I am only briefly touching on this now because, of course, in the future, I would like to make a full project, who knows, maybe a two-parter, on the funding schemes and methods behind the legacy apparatus. [Visual, 2:44:32] The narrator speaking in a podcast studio with headphones on. [Visual, 2:44:45] CGI of a silver UFO in a hangar, with a glowing green shield and lock icon showing “PROGRAM PROTECTION”. [Narrator, 2:44:45] We talked so much about program protection and program exposure mitigation within the legacy programs, but let’s continue with a few specific examples. As we talked about with DARPA SID, there is, of course, the topic of wetworks. [Visual, 2:44:55] Logo of DARPA. [Visual, 2:45:00] Photograph of Air Force pilot Matthew “Quake” Sullivan in front of a fighter jet. [Narrator, 2:45:00] I can think of no better, possible, alleged example than the hero who is the late Matthew Sullivan. As we know from Representative Burlison, Matthew Sullivan was set to deliver protected disclosures on the topic of UFO legacy programs, whereas he mysteriously passed away from a quote-unquote accidental overdose just two weeks prior. [Visual, 2:45:07] Representative Eric Burlison speaking on camera, with overlay “ERIC BURLISON (R) | MISSOURI CONGRESSMAN / WH PROBING DISAPPEARANCES, DEATHS OF SCIENTISTS”. [Visual, 2:45:15] Article screenshot about Matthew James Sullivan, showing he died at his home in Falls Church, VA. [Visual, 2:45:22] Photographic portrait of Matthew Sullivan in pilot helmet, then group photo of soldiers in front of a sign “AFGHAN SPARKY RESTAURANT”, then logo of NASIC. [Narrator, 2:45:22] Sullivan was a decorated Air Force veteran who earned a Bronze Star for Valor in Operation Enduring Freedom, served within Air Force Intelligence, the National Security Agency, as well as the National Air and Space Intelligence Center, NASIC. [Visual, 2:45:37] CGI showing interior of a dark hangar with a UFO, camera panning. [Narrator, 2:45:37] Many have wondered if indeed Sullivan was part of the legacy program, and like swirling rumors suggested, had firsthand experience with recovered UFO craft. To answer that question, who do you think David Grusch is speaking about in this clip? [Visual, 2:45:47] David Grusch testifying in Congress. [Visual, 2:45:52] David Grusch speaking in a room with framed certificates on the wall. [David Grusch, 2:45:52] We should be leveraging, um, you know, national overhead enterprise and, and other parts of our national intelligence enterprise on this topic, but we use it, you know, in secret, on the down-low, the night job of a certain analyst at NASIC, who also works for the, the legacy program, that’s also analyzing this stuff, without telling his boss. That’s essentially, um, how the program has, um, you know, dealt with this over the time, and I just think that that’s a real travesty. [Visual, 2:46:21] Close-up of a cassette tape playing in a tape deck. [Narrator, 2:46:21] And again, let’s listen in to what David Grusch said recently on Fox News. [Visual, 2:46:26] Split screen of Fox News with David Grusch. [David Grusch, 2:46:26] And certainly recently, uh, my good Air Force friend, uh, Matthew, call sign Quake Sullivan, um, did, uh, pass away mysteriously before he was willing, uh, to come to the Hill to testify about his knowledge of these activities. And, and, uh, Quake was a Bronze Star recipient, uh, and an Air Force officer, intel officer friend of mine that I served with. And, you know, he was one of my, you know, sources in my investigation, and, you know, he, you know, he passed away mysteriously, and that is an ongoing FBI matter, so I won’t characterize it, and I’m open to, you know, different conclusions of what happened. Uh, but just, you know, to your point, there’s been a lot of anomalous things that have happened to people. [Visual, 2:47:05] Logo showing “WEAPONIZED WITH JEREMY CORBELL & GEORGE KNAPP”, then a scene showing three men sitting around a wooden table. [Narrator, 2:47:05] As we know from Grusch, Burlison, Brown, and others, administrative terrorism is another vehicle harnessed by program protection elements to make a whistleblower or prospective whistleblower’s life unbearable. [Visual, 2:47:19] Logo of DARPA. [Visual, 2:47:21] The narrator speaking in a podcast studio with headphones on. [Narrator, 2:47:21] Since we just referenced SID, and I speak often on Northrop, perhaps this Matt Brown quote is quite poignant here. [Visual, 2:47:27] Outdoor podcast set of “Weaponized” showing Jeremy Corbell, Matt Brown, and George Knapp. [Matt Brown, 2:47:27] Key players in the legacy security architecture lately or currently at Northrop Grumman, and his name is [Visual, 2:47:35] Black screen with the text “NAME REDACTED”. [Robotic Voice, 2:47:35] NAME REDACTED [Jeremy Corbell, 2:47:36] Show us a photo of that. [Matt Brown, 2:47:37] I have it right here. [Jeremy Corbell, 2:47:39] I know you do. Before we look at this photo, not only that, you could prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt in the court of law. And if anything were to happen to you or anybody, then it’ll all be put out anyway. [Matt Brown, 2:47:54] Yes, and it’s not just me. You know, in my last interview I said that it’s been a long, hard road to find allies. I have them now, and I do. And we are done taking punches and not punching back. [Robotic Voice, 2:48:12] NAME REDACTED [Matt Brown, 2:48:13] …is responsible… [Jeremy Corbell, 2:48:14] Okay, so, has been responsible for a lot of what you’re talking about current day. [Visual, 2:48:17] Black screen with the text “REDACTED”. [Matt Brown, 2:48:22] Current day as it relates to the UAP problem. He is a nexus point for legacy security, he is part of the dirty tricks department. People bring names that need to be handled to this individual, this person looks at those names, matches it to the capabilities to go achieve X, Y, Z objectives, and then the result is an ecosystem flooded with disinformation and psychological operations and targeted attacks against whistleblowers and their allies. [Jeremy Corbell, 2:48:46] How do you know? [Matt Brown, 2:48:48] So, I cannot reveal everything about this, because I am communicating it for others. [Jeremy Corbell, 2:48:57] And where, what is his current role in government, if any? [Matt Brown, 2:49:00] No role in government, but in the military-industrial complex he is, most recently at Northrop Grumman. [Jeremy Corbell, 2:49:08] Uh-huh. [Matt Brown, 2:49:10] And the little title he has here that people might find interesting is, uh, Deputy SAPCO for DARPA. [Visual, 2:49:20] Split screen of Judicial Watch interview with David Grusch. [Narrator, 2:49:20] Within the David Grusch Judicial Watch interview that we might have quoted a dozen times now and that keeps on giving, Grusch spoke on some administrative terrorism that was leveraged against him to destroy his career before, during, and after his public exposure. [Visual, 2:49:27] Aerial view of the Pentagon. [Visual, 2:49:36] David Grusch speaking in a room with framed certificates on the wall. [David Grusch, 2:49:36] And there was all these manufactured allegations against me, whether from a security perspective, which is kind of funny because of what I did for a living, uh, from personal conduct. All that was unfounded, and I maintain my, you know, TS/SCI clearance. Uh, but they, you know, went after several people I know, administratively, um, even, uh, right after I left NGA they went after my chief of staff, tried to revoke his clearance. They were… [Visual, 2:50:00] Jason Sands in front of framed certificates [Jason Sands, 2:50:00] …so to my boss’s clearance at the NRO, and they just say they started, like, well who was Dave’s enabler and who who you know who might have told Dave something? [Tom Fitton, 2:50:09] Right. [Jason Sands, 2:50:10] And so they started potshotting people, and that’s the insidious thing the security mafia will do. It’s, you know, your clearance is your livelihood, and, and your reputation, from a conduct perspective. And I just know so many people in my orbit, um, that they went after, either, you know, legally, administratively… [Tom Fitton, 2:50:29] Right. [Jason Sands, 2:50:30] …ruining people’s lives. I have friends of mine that have been out of work for three and a half years now. A very senior person in the, in the SAP community, uh, was taken out, and is still going through years of legal appeals. And even for my reprisal matter, you know, trying to prove my case on that, I’ve been seeking documents since 2022 on that matter. I’ve been denied B7A FOIA exemption, law enforcement records. Well, what’s going on? What, what investigation is going on… [Tom Fitton, 2:50:58] Right, right. [Visual, 2:50:59] Split screen of Tom Fitton and Jason Sands [Jason Sands, 2:51:00] …for that exemption? And I’m likely going to have to sue those law enforcement agencies like I’m doing EDVA, uh, with, with the Air Force complaint against myself, because that’s the only way I’m gonna, I’m gonna get production in a timely fashion. And the process, I feel, is the punishment for a lot of whistleblowers. So there’s this, uh, sophomoric analysis going around in the disclosure community, ‘Oh, well, they’ve never came after whistleblowers making classified disclosures to Congress.’ Well, that may be true literally on the books as a matter of legal record, but there’s all these admin terrorism techniques they can do to you, your family… [Visual, 2:51:36] Title card “UNRIVALED SECRECY” with a triangular aircraft [Narrator, 2:51:37] Unrivaled secrecy. We have spent at this point nearly seven hours exhaustively discussing systems, methods, and loopholes legacy programs have taken for decades to carry out the retrieval, exploitation, and derivation of non-human technical vehicles with total, impenetrable security. [Narrator, 2:51:57] And the thing is, we are just scratching the surface here. Such systems we have talked about include translating the secrecy apparatus of the Manhattan Project onto what I dubbed the Manhattan Project 2.0; establishing the National Security Council’s covert action 5412 Committee Special Group as the early overall program coordinator; taking custody of recovered vehicles to Atomic Energy Commission laboratories that would blossom to the current FFRDC GOCO infrastructure within legacy today; the 1954 Atomic Energy Act introducing a litany of further classification and security protocols protected by extreme statutory authority, breaking the programs into siloed containers, hidden within cover offices and programs to hide from then black budget oversight reforms during the Cold War; and permanently severing off the legacy program control group into a quasi-government and industry group of just over two dozen in 1994. [Visual, 2:52:11] “5412 COMMITTEE ‘SPECIAL GROUP’” flowchart over photo of President Eisenhower [Visual, 2:52:19] Atomic Energy Commission seal with title “GUARDIAN OF THE ATOM” [Visual, 2:52:28] Document page of the “Atomic Energy Act of 1954” [Visual, 2:52:39] Ronald Reagan speaking [Visual, 2:52:48] Bill Clinton speaking [Narrator, 2:52:57] We discussed legacy activities exploiting special access, controlled access, and non-covert action programs. Specifically, the White House creating non-covert action White House SAPs to completely waive any reporting requirements and budgetary information. [Visual, 2:53:00] Rocket launch tower with checklist overlay of programs [Visual, 2:53:08] White House at night with text “NON-COVERT ACTION WHITE HOUSE SAPS” [Narrator, 2:53:16] We analyzed the SAP world, to identify where gatekeeping structures are set up at the highest echelons of the SAP enterprise, to restrict even credentialed individuals from accessing the programs if they do not possess a relevant need to know. [Visual, 2:53:16] Aerial view of the Pentagon [Visual, 2:53:24] Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson testifying [Narrator, 2:53:32] We studied types and classifications of SAPs, and ultimately discussed examples of such legacy SAPs crossing over with three relevant OSD departments that are critical to legacy operations: USD(I&S), USD(R&E), and USD(A&S). [Visual, 2:53:33] Flowchart of SAP types over a disc-shaped craft [Narrator, 2:53:50] Indeed, we also discussed DOE SAPs, and their multifaceted authority from both EO 13526 and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. [Visual, 2:53:56] Aerial view of Los Alamos National Laboratory with checklist [Narrator, 2:54:00] We even analyzed misappropriation of funds used to funnel money to these programs, including haircuts across programs, IRAD, hidden budgets, self-fund, and possible illegal activity. [Visual, 2:54:07] Checklist of misappropriation funding sources [Narrator, 2:54:13] We identified several program protection agencies, deputized to enforce insider and outsider threat protection for the legacy infrastructure. These include DARPA SID, AFOSI PJ, AFLCMC IP, and DOE OICI. [Visual, 2:54:23] Logos of DARPA, Office of Special Projects, AFLCMC, and DOE [Narrator, 2:54:30] We even reviewed possible actions taken by these services, such as wet works and administrative terrorism. [Visual, 2:54:30] David Grusch and Karl Nell being sworn in at a hearing [Narrator, 2:54:37] Lastly, we have discussed disinformation and narrative management, highlighting a coordinated disinformation effort that has been in place since roughly 1953, with three major milestones: the Robertson Panel, Condon Committee, and AARO. [Visual, 2:54:50] Sean Kirkpatrick testifying with checklist [Narrator, 2:54:53] We studied a parallel effort to AARO, that while also operating as a narrative management campaign, originated from within a different section of the onion: Lou Elizondo and the AATIP cover program. [Visual, 2:55:03] Lou Elizondo photo [Narrator, 2:55:07] I’m sure I’ll get flak for such discussion of Lou, but it is critical to discuss this topic and the nuances behind why there has always been so much controversy behind Elizondo. Elizondo is not the champion of disclosure we humans deserve. Once again, if Lou Elizondo operated at the behest of legacy programs before, during, or after the fake AATIP program, he should just come out and say it. He still does have time to do the right thing. [Visual, 2:55:34] Blue screen transition [Visual, 2:55:35] Gerb wearing headphones speaking into a podcast microphone [Gerb, 2:55:35] And believe it or not, guys, there is still so much I haven’t gotten to that I feel like I’m missing out by not including in our investigation. But this is already such a robust and long project. Two specific examples parallel to the SAP enterprise come to mind: Managed Need-To-Know, MNTK, codewords and constructs, and alternative compensatory control measures, ACCMs. And, yeah, we’ll probably get to these in the future. [Visual, 2:55:50] Text “MANAGED NEED-TO-KNOW (MNTK) CODEWORDS & CONSTRUCTS” [Visual, 2:55:54] Text “ALTERNATIVE COMPENSATORY CONTROL MEASURES (ACCMS)” [Visual, 2:56:01] Pyramid diagram of “UFO LEGACY PROGRAMS” [Narrator, 2:56:01] So, as we’ve seen here, the outermost protective layer of my legacy program pyramid (security, secrecy, and program protection) is no small fish to tackle. I sincerely hope, over the course of this monolithic investigation, you have learned a thing or two as to how the legacy programs have maintained their covert, impenetrable nature. These programs are so secret and siloed, we as Americans are facing a severe national issue, where such legacy programs are a pitiful shell of themselves, rife with adversarial fiefdoms, subject to insane brain drain, and a system of enormous waste. [Visual, 2:56:12] Gerb in a blue suit speaking at a desk [Visual, 2:56:35] James Clapper speaking [Visual, 2:56:43] Screen fades to black [Visual, 2:56:45] Gerb speaking to the camera in front of bookshelves [Gerb, 2:56:45] What’s going on, guys? It’s Gerb, and I say this at the end of every single video, but I mean it especially now. If you’re still here with me, thank you from the bottom of my heart. It means the most that you would watch this, uh, two-part, at this point, about seven-hour investigation with me, learn with me, uh, research with me, discover with me. So, thank you so much. I appreciate it more than you can ever possibly understand. [Gerb, 2:57:10] Uh, this two-part investigation has, without a doubt, been my favorite work to date, uh, not only because this two-part has taken up so much of my life over the past couple of months—and that’s not even considering the editing on the videos, that has taken forever—but the writing of the script, um, the researching, getting my thoughts together, collecting these statements, uh, into a digestible format that I’ve collected over the years. I really loved this project. And when I started off, when I started off with this project, I thought it was going to be relatively simple like I do with every single video. [Gerb, 2:57:44] Uh, but as you could see, I could make a part two, uh, uh, this is a part two, I’m sorry, part three, part four, possibly even a part five. You know, even in the SAP discussions, I didn’t even get to Managed Need-To-Know constructs and codewords, as well as ACCMs, uh, accredited compensatory control measures, and, uh, there’s a lot more I would have loved to have talked about: more program protection strategies, more of the history that we talked about so much in part one. But, you know, if you’re new to my channel, well if you haven’t watched part one, go watch it now, because I’m about to say the same thing I said at the end of that. This is about the time, if you’re new, where I do my post-video rant. [Gerb, 2:58:21] For me, it’s kind of a celebratory way to get on camera and just talk, uh, without a script, without worrying about how I’m going to construct the next statement, construct the next argument, or lead into the next section. Uh, so it really is nice for me just to hop on here and talk with you guys and kind of share my thoughts at the end of the project without having to, uh, you know, go ahead and edit the footage, uh, etc. So, uh, let’s try and focus as much as we can here on part two today, because I’ve already done a part one debrief, and so on. [Gerb, 2:58:50] Uh, part two, as I stated so often, the most important part of this project, and I’m going to stress it again and maybe we’ll spend a good amount of time talking about it here, is the specifics that the legacy program, programs has used, uh, to kind of manipulate and massage special access, controlled access, and covert action programs. [Gerb, 2:59:14] As I stated throughout this project, much of the argument about UFO legacy programs is presidents, temporary employees, the vast majority of the Congress, and other, uh, appointed folks within the U.S. government, more often than not, are not read into these programs. And I maintain that is true. As I’ve argued, uh, throughout my previous videos, throughout the two-part investigation today, is that the very legal and statutory basis for the legacy programs was born out of the executive branch, specifically the White House, specifically the National Security Council, uh, specifically some stuff set up by Truman, and then more concretely, the 5412 Committee Special Group set up by Eisenhower. So, uh, since the 1950s, that would be 1954, 1955, for the NSC 54… [Narrator, 3:00:00] 12. Uh, the legacy program effort was concentrated out of the National Security Council, uh, up until about 1994, you know, there was frag- fragmentation of the programs, uh, throughout the Reagan administration, the ending of Top Secret Codeword access through Executive Order 12356, National Security Decision Memorandum 159, and so forth. Uh, but the controlling entity of the programs, for the overwhelming majority of the program’s lifespan, has been the National Security Council. [Narrator, 3:00:28] Now, as we talked about so much, in 1994, there was a quasi-industry and government control group of just over two dozen. I think if you watch back the video, you can find the exact number as I, uh, stated it visually several times. [Narrator, 3:00:43] Uh, control was vested out of the National Security Council. Uh, the primary reason here was, uh, fear over Clinton’s disclosures and, uh, John M. Deutch and, and William Perry, William Perry specifically, his SAPOC reforms, uh, kind of, it, it, it attempted to then serve as the primary gatekeeping structure. So, [Narrator, 3:01:02] before we talk about these specifics with content-only and non-covert action programs, uh, let’s talk about the hierarchy of SAPs again because I do think this is very important. And of course, we’ll talk about the types of SAPs, uh, the protection levels, and just kind of re-go over what we’ve spent so much time talking about here. [Narrator, 3:01:19] Uh, the hierarchy and governance of special access programs. You have your component-level SAPCOs, uh, SAP Central Offices. Each element of the Armed Forces, so six total, has their own component-level SAPCO. Um, and the, so does DARPA, so does the Missile Defense Agency, and so do the Joint Chiefs of Staff. And these component-level SAPCOs have, uh, kind of purview of all SAPs under their relevant departments. [Narrator, 3:01:46] And then you have USD. Now, USD W, I’m never going to call it the Department of War, it will always be the DOD for me. Uh, they have their own SAPCO, and then you have the DOD-level SAPCO, the Department of Defense-wide level SAPCO. Uh, the DOD SAPCO is kind of the interface and access approval authority, basically, for members of Congress. Uh, the DOD SAPCO also kind of governs SAP policy for all DOD-wide, uh, SAPs. Above that, you kind of have the Senior Review Group, which belongs to the SAPOC, the Oversight Committee of SAPs. [Narrator, 3:02:16] The Senior Review Group is a group of, uh, senior executive-level officials, Senior Executive Service individuals. Um, I think that when Dave Grusch in 2023 said, uh, senior executive officials instead of Senior Executive Service, um, this is because SES members, uh, it’s, it’s kind of more of a broad paintbrush. You know, we talk about SES individuals like William E. McClure, uh, Randall G. Walden, Harry Phillips, Liam Russ, etc. But there’s also DISES, Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service. This would be somebody like Jay Stratton while he was on ONI. So senior executive officials is just kind of a broad term for that, both in and out of government. [Narrator, 3:02:53] Uh, the Senior Review Group is supposed to prevent kind of duplication of SAPs across the DOD, and we know with legacy programs that this hasn’t been done. I do not mean it, uh, hyperbole when I talk about the Army and another branch of the Armed Forces, uh, kind of having, uh, duplicated special access programs on the exotic front, kind of crossing over, or doing the same thing, I mean to say, with no crossover of personnel, Program Security Officers, SAP Security Officers, uh, Contractor Security Officers, etc., uh, completely siloed projects. [Narrator, 3:03:27] And then you have the SAPOC, and kind of the SAPOC is where a lot of decision-making is made of special access programs. Uh, we also had the, it was the Senior SAP Working Group we didn’t really talk about, but the, the SAPOC is kind of the upper echelon here, and from what I understand from the Wilson Davis notes that this is indeed true, as in 1994, the SAPOC and the SAPOC’s SRG kind of got put in place as a gatekeeping structure, uh, for access into the legacy programs. This isn’t to be confused with something like the Majestic 12. [Narrator, 3:03:57] Uh, the Majestic 12 or modern day, it’s not the MJ-27, but a group of, uh, quasi-industry and government control group. These are not the gatekeeping structure for the programs, though they do involve. For example, if you have somebody like a DARPA-sent individual who’s in this new group of over two dozen who needs somebody gone, um, that would be something that would be made at that sort of executive-level position, and then your program protection agencies would deal with that person. [Narrator, 3:04:26] Uh, but the, the SAPOC and their SRG are just more of, of gatekeepers. Okay? They, they keep the gates, uh, for specifically cleared personnel and, uh, to access the programs and manage need to know. Uh, we know with Admiral Thomas Wilson that even though he was Deputy Director of the DIA at the time, he was denied access. I’m aware of another four-star general who had no idea the programs existed and was somehow able to use his credentials, and he had really good credentials after a period of time, to, uh, brute force his way into the programs, but, you know, if you want to talk about your Senior Review Group and, within the Wilson Davis notes, the Watch Committee, uh, the Watch Committee there would be directly connected, possibly even carryover members, uh, to that, uh, quasi-government and industry control group of, of just over two dozen. [Narrator, 3:05:16] So, uh, you know, that’s without even talking about the SAP Security Officers, PSOs, uh, even further access approval authorities, but, but that’s sort of the hierarchy and governance of SAPs and, at the SAPCO, but more importantly, SAPOC and SRG level, that’s where a lot of the gatekeeping into the programs are. [Narrator, 3:05:32] Uh, we talked about the types of SAPs. Types of SAPs being acquisition, which comprise about 75 to 80% of all SAPs, intelligence, and operations and support. And I gave what I thought was a pretty, a pretty good example of if you have a triangular airframe that incorporates several elements of, of non-human technology. An acquisition SAP, uh, you know, you… Remember, we have SAP umbrellas, but an acquisition SAP on this project would be how this airframe is built. If this airframe, in the example I used, used a, um, reverse-engineered propulsion system and electro-optic cloaking. Gosh, I talk about electro-optic cloaking stripped from craft quite a lot, don’t I? I hope some people have picked up on that. [Narrator, 3:06:12] Uh, the intelligence SAP would protect how we know what we know, um, kind of the intelligence behind that craft recovery and how those materials or those systems were deemed to be exploitable. And the operations and support SAP would support how and where this craft or vehicle is used. Um, maybe another example we could kind of chew through live would be the Immaculate Constellation activity. [Narrator, 3:06:37] Uh, recently Dave Grusch has talked about, which I’m, I’m so happy he has, because now I can kind of state it as fact, because I was also aware of this, uh, that the Immaculate Constellation activity was run out of the National Security Council, uh, established in about 2017. I reckon this was likely an intelligence SAP, uh, just as I reckon that the AATIP was kind of, uh, even though an informal working group, kind of disguised as, uh, an intelligence SAP, and I’ll, I’ll kind of say why there. [Narrator, 3:07:05] Uh, recently at his, uh, I think it was California show where Jeremy Corbell was on, Lue, Lue Elizondo was asked several questions about James Clapper and AAWSAP, AATIP, I apologize. My mind’s running right now, guys. I have a million thoughts going through my head, so if I’m tripping up, I’m so sorry. [Narrator, 3:07:22] Uh, Lue, I, I, I reckon he kind of dug himself into more hot waters by saying that AATIP was a sub-SAP to AAWSAP. Now, remember from the SAP umbrella, you have SAPs, you have the SAP umbrella, you have the subcompartments, and you have even further compartmentalization down to where similar CPI is grouped, and so forth. [Narrator, 3:07:43] Uh, this isn’t true. AATIP was an informal working group. So, uh, in my opinion, and I don’t think that’s my opinion, but, um, I don’t think that’s true, that AATIP was a sub-SAP to the AAWSAP. Uh, AATIP directly operated out of the National Security Council, uh, and was a cover for several National Security Council activities. And as Lue continues to dodge the question around Clapper, I wonder who gave, uh, cover for these activities that, uh, AATIP was kind of acting through, um, as a cover. So, there’s a lot of pieces to pick up there. And then the, the Immaculate Constellation activity, I also believe, was an intelligence SAP. [Narrator, 3:08:24] Uh, but let’s talk about the protection levels of SAPs because my brain wants to go right now into content-only and non-covert action programs, but I’m just trying to progress logically as we get there. We know that SAPs protection levels come in acknowledged, which generally has an unclassified budget and a lot of congressional members can get a read-in onto that; unacknowledged, which carry multitudes higher security budget than standard acknowledged SAPs, often time the budgets for unacknowledged SAPs are kind of rolled into generic budgets or they are completely classified; and then waived, which are the most serious SAPs possible where the SAPOC would kind of review the, the need and continued need for waived statuses because the SAPOC and its permanent members and its SRG are read into all waived USAPs throughout the entire US government, at least within the DOD. [Narrator, 3:09:19] Uh, waived USAPs are extremely serious, and a lot of the times, only the Gang of Eight or Gang of Four is supposed to be read into these projects. But as we know with the legacy programs, often times this is avoided, and, uh, there’s key Congress people put here and there who are read into such activities. Um, I would look at some senators or congressmen who were family or related to former presidents to kind of find out some, some people who might fit that bill. [Narrator, 3:09:46] And then we know there’s, there’s further, uh, kind of security, not classifications, but security protections that can be put on. We know bigoted, as Dave Grusch talked about, which is by name. Uh, we also of course know the more, much more state… [Visual, 3:10:00] A man with a mustache is speaking directly to the camera in front of a white wall with bookshelves. [Narrator, 3:10:00] under no foreign, not releasable to foreign nationals, and I mentioned no foreign because I’m specifically aware of programs that utilize the no foreign carb out, um, back in their heyday. Those programs have ended. I imagine their records and materials have been either destroyed or buried. Um, but I am confident that that selection of of specific programs, uh, not only existed, but uh, dealt with some pretty pretty wide, wide topics from reverse engineering to crash retrievals to the study of biologics. [Narrator, 3:10:30] So now let’s get finally to the real meat and potatoes and most interesting and most important part of this video, in my opinion, which is: how can legacy programs use special access programs to completely waive any carb out or reporting requirements and maintain total secrecy? Because this after all, if we’re studying the legacy programs in the modern day, is the whole crux and most important piece of this video. [Narrator, 3:10:55] Dave Grusch’s Judicial Watch interview is sublime. It’s probably the best interview I’ve ever seen on the topic, it’s fantastic. And Dave Grusch gave so many nuggets, not only to kind of shout out that the National Security Council’s 5412 Committee with five initial members was sort of the, uh, initial program coordinator for the legacy structure, but so much more. [Narrator, 3:11:15] Dave talked about some of the tricks of the trade that have been used by the programs, and that’s to take covert action programs, which are outlined by 50 U.S. Code 3093. Uh, these 3093 specifically was established in the late, uh, or sorry, early 1990s. Uh, but covert action goes way deeper. Covert action was born kind of officially out of the 1947 National Security Act, and then cemented in the 1954 policy on covert action by Eisenhower, which established the 5412 Committee and its special group. Uh, the 5412 Committee was established to have oversight and purview of covert actions. So inherently, as I stated, that if you have UFO legacy programs operating out of the National Security Council’s 5412 Committee Special Group, which is true, these activities would inherently be classified as covert action. [Narrator, 3:12:05] As the epochs evolved, these activities would be applicable under covert action programs as 50 U.S. Code 3093. So, as Dave Grusch said, these covert action programs were transitioned into non-covert action programs, White House SAPs, which effectively waived all reporting and carb out requirements. [Narrator, 3:12:25] Uh, the most important part of this video is: how do you take a White House SAP, a Title 10 U.S. Code 119, slash a covert action program, 30 U.S. Code, uh, 50 U.S. Code 3093, and how do you get this program to operate in the gray area between Title 10 and Title 50 with no reporting and no carb out requirements? There’s so many pieces that if you’ve watched any of my other videos, you can kind of pick up on this, but this is the application of content-only SAPs. [Narrator, 3:12:55] Content-only SAPs are not a type of SAP, nor protection level, but a budgetary tier slash administrative designation. Content-only SAPs contain CPI, critical program information, only, and do not have a budget, or do not have an applicable budget, because it is rolled into generic DoD, Armed Forces, or other defense-related budgets. This is critical. This is why one of the huge, one of the biggest talking points is how are these programs funded. There’s so much talk about misappropriation of funds. The legacy programs have had to get ultra-creative with funding schemes because the budget is outside of the program. [Narrator, 3:13:35] The budget is outside of the program. We know f- and, and these content-only SAPs can still operate within a SAP umbrella, or towards the top of a SAP umbrella, where other activities, compartments, etc., are below the content-only SAP. So, the actual crash retrieval operations, reverse engineering, are not done within the content-only SAP or content-only SAP umbrella, but are attributable to that SAP. [Narrator, 3:13:58] So, that’s why we have haircuts across programs. Uh, that’s why we have self-fund from agency cutout activities, formally like E-Systems. Uh, that’s why we have haircuts across the U.S. Forestry Service, Bureau of Land Management, etc. And that’s why, disturbingly, we have criminal enterprises that Dave Grusch spoke of on Fox News. I have had the displeasure of learning a little bit more about those and, uh, I, I really hope there is a continued federal investigation into some of the criminal enterprise activities around these projects. [Narrator, 3:14:31] And then, of course, we know from witness Ed, there’s large swaths of money that reach Air Force Acquisition before any sort of review from Air Force Financial Management, SAF/FM, are thrown away into some black hole pot that Ed kind of figured was a joint Air Force and NRO project. [Narrator, 3:14:49] So, content-only SAPs. This is one of the biggest tools of the trade. And guys, this speaks to something which is far more concerning. Uh, some of my contemporaries, I know Steven Greer does this quite a bit, states the legacy program apparatus is a cabal of illegal activity and are inherently unconstitutional, so everybody who signed a non-disclosure agreement at the behest of these, uh, special access projects, he calls them, uh, they’re not, the NDAs inherently aren’t real and you can violate them and there’s no legal ramifications. That is not true. [Narrator, 3:15:23] The biggest concern here is that the regulatory and statutory authority behind the legacy programs are absolutely legal. They exist in a gray area. They exist because of massaging of the special access program enterprise and control and governance structure, and they exist because of classified presidential executive orders back in the 40s and 50s. But the very SAPs themselves are not illegal. They’re not, they are unconstitutional, but not illegal. Now, the activities that these programs, special access programs, and activities do, those are highly illegal: the misappropriation of funds, uh, the possible blue-on-blue action that has been suffered in the past, the myriad white-and-blue collar crimes. Those are illegal. But the very existence of the programs themselves, those are not illegal because there has been purposefully sought-after gray areas in which to hide these programs. [Narrator, 3:16:16] These programs have matured for 80 plus years at this point. You’ve got to think there have been really crafty ways to hide this, these programs, and the statutory authority behind these programs, between Title 10, Title 50 authorities. So that even empowered investigators like Dave Grusch, when they find the programs, and they take their information to the Inspector General, it’s going to be really dang hard for individuals with appropriate access credentials to follow up on that information. [Narrator, 3:16:46] Uh, these programs have gotten great at secrecy. And like I talked about, even though over the time epochs, the programs have broken themselves apart from a once-centralized effort under NSC 5412 Special Group, into a quasi-industry government control group, the one thing that has gotten better is the secrecy apparatus of the programs. We face brain drain today. There’s no collaboration across compartments. Northrop Grumman’s doing their own thing, I mean, they’re still active in some NSC legacy activities, but for all in large, they’re doing their own thing. [Narrator, 3:17:17] We’re at risk of severe brain drain. Has progress stagnated? I’m not sure. Uh, if progress has stagnated, it would be post-2009, um, when Dick Cheney left office. But what needs to happen alongside disclosure is a complete reorganization of oversight and the legacy program hierarchy. Imagine the brain power behind this program set if it was completely constitutional, above board. Sure, still protected by waived SAPs, but still reported to appropriate Gang of Eight, Congressional intelligence committees, etc., and had presidential overview. This could be the dawn of a new age for U.S. science, technology, space programs. But these programs need to be back under traditional oversight channels, and it’s not impossible, but it’s very challenging. Because ever since, I mean, the dominoes were kind of put in place when the program was relegated to NSC 5412, but really since Reagan in the early 1980s, once Yellow Fruit was uncovered, these programs have been scattering, folding in on themselves. I like to kind of visualize this as there’s some string physicists who were creating objects, shapes to kind of represent the manifold of like an eleventh-dimensional space. I’m not sure who the physicist was, and I’m not sure where to find these objects, but that’s how I imagine the legacy structure: something infinitely more complex than a tesseract or a Möbius cube, consistently folding in on itself, expanding and contracting in various areas, where you might be able to look at the surface area of one part of the program, but it’s constantly evolving. And you know, I’ve done my best to try and capture that evolution throughout this throughout this series, but there’s still so much more to cover. [Narrator, 3:18:58] I’m going on long on my rant, guys. Uh, we haven’t even gotten to program protection agencies, but I’ve talked about those so much, especially the SID, or narrative slash disinformation control. I’m sure I’ll get some flak about Lue Elizondo, but I stand for transparency, partial disclosure due to protection of equities, or protection of co-workers, or bosses, or individuals that have worked within the legacy architecture for years. That’s not going to fly right now. That sort of push within the aid of disclosure, it’s not going to continue to work. This is why we need individuals like David Grusch, who are completely mission-oriented, open kimono, not holding back, besides not saying stuff to where he’s going to get prosecuted or go to jail, because he’s had to avoid that in the past, and I don’t blame the guy for not incriminating himself and subjecting himself to espionage or treason by stating this is exactly where the crafts and biologics that I’m aware of are buried. So, these partial disclosure campaigns that have been pushed since 2017, really back since the AATIP cover program was initiated, these won’t fly. And the, I, I… [Visual, 3:20:00] Narrator speaking in a room with a shelf, books, and framed pictures in the background. [Narrator, 3:20:00] …again. If Lou Elizondo was part of the legacy programs, he should just come out and say it. There’s still time to do the right thing. [Narrator, 3:20:07] Uh, but as he said on a recent show, history will remember him as a hero or one of the biggest villains. [Narrator, 3:20:13] I speak directly to you now, Mr. Elizondo. You have a chance to still be an American hero. [Narrator, 3:20:19] Uh, if there is information you are holding on to, individuals you are protecting, lies you are telling, you will go down as a villain. [Narrator, 3:20:25] And as an American, I, I hope the right choices can be made. That’s, that’s all I’ll say there because I don’t have, I can’t direct you on, on how to act, [Narrator, 3:20:35] but now is the time to, to push forward for disclosure and, and really open transparency, especially your knowledge and involvement within the, uh, program dataset. [Narrator, 3:20:44] So, that’s all I’ll say there. And, again, I still think there are worthy questions to be asked, [Narrator, 3:20:49] like did Mr. Elizondo expose Tom DeLonge, um, to elements of the Immaculate Constellation project back in 2017 when he left as director of AATIP [Narrator, 3:20:57] and joined TTSA where he was liaison to the NRO, NGA, and several other, uh, agencies and services. [Narrator, 3:21:03] I say this all allegedly. Uh, I’m a character, I play a character, and this is all for entertainment purposes. [Narrator, 3:21:10] But guys, thank you so much for joining me. From the bottom of my heart, it means the most. [Narrator, 3:21:15] I’m recording this on the 17th of June, 2026. The video is to be posted the 19th. [Narrator, 3:21:20] I got some awesome stuff coming up at the end of the month. I can’t wait for you guys to watch that. [Narrator, 3:21:25] Already on my whiteboard over here, I have the next three projects lined out. The next one I’m super excited to get to, it’s going to be a blast. [Narrator, 3:21:32] So thank you all so much for joining me. [Narrator, 3:21:34] Uh, remember I do have a Patreon. I don’t gatekeep content there, uh, so only support what you think the channel is worth. [Narrator, 3:21:40] Who knows, maybe in the future I can do like, uh, a live every other week for Patreon and YouTube members, because I have YouTube membership as well. [Narrator, 3:21:48] But right now, I, I’m just pushing so hard to make real change in this topic. Please, uh, forgive me if I can’t, uh, provide additional content right now for that, [Narrator, 3:21:57] but everybody who supports that, I thank you so much from the bottom of my heart. You allow me to do this, you allow me to buy that Panasonic Toughbook over the, over my shoulder over there. [Narrator, 3:22:05] But please also remember to like and subscribe. Uh, follow the Dreamland Motels, Xander Jones, he makes amazing music for this. [Narrator, 3:22:13] Follow Mr. Justin, who is a member of the Night Shift podcast. He is currently helping me make my website. He’s a wonderful man. He made that flux liner over my left shoulder. Incredible guy, follow him. [Narrator, 3:22:24] Follow Xander Jones, follow Rob Jones, follow Kermit, follow all my friends who are doing great stuff in this work. [Narrator, 3:22:30] Uh, support Dave Grusch, support Karl Nell, support Matt Radin, and, guys, thank you so much. [Narrator, 3:22:35] From the bottom of my heart, this endeavor has inspired me more than any other I’ve done. So thank you, guys, [Narrator, 3:22:40] and we will catch you all in the next project. And please look forward to that because I’m really darn excited for it. Bye.