UFOpedia

jonstewart-michael-l-2023-lockheed-claims

10 min read

“Michael L” emails to Jon Stewart — December 2023 Lockheed UAP-retrieval claims

A 25-page PDF circulating in UAP-discourse circles in May 2026 showing iPhone screenshots of email and iMessage correspondence between Jon Stewart (comedian, jonalanstewart@aol.com) and “Michael L” (thyaweg@gmail.com) from December 4-21, 2023. Michael L claims to be a former USMC + DIA intelligence analyst turned Lockheed Martin security program manager, currently at Battelle Seattle, who was “read into the UAP program” and shares specific second-hand claims about a Lockheed-internal NHI craft retrieval team and a fatal 2004 firefight between JSOC and Lockheed teams in the US southwest.

The PDF appears to have been compiled and circulated by Jon Stewart himself (red handwritten annotations on a LinkedIn page, screenshots from Jon’s own iPhone, references to “Jon’s AOL Sent Mailbox”).

Michael L’s claimed credentials

  • Served in USMC as an intelligence analyst
  • Then Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) as an intelligence analyst
  • Then Lockheed Martin as a security program manager
  • Currently Battelle (Seattle, WA satellite office at 1100 Dexter Ave. North, Suite 400)
  • Claims to be Asian-American
  • States he was “read into the general UAP program” but not the specific “in-house recovery team”

None of these credentials are independently verified within the document. Jon Stewart’s annotated LinkedIn search (page 22) appears to have found a different Michael L (Lockheed Martin Orlando) who is annotated as NOT the correct person.

Substantive claims

About Lockheed’s UAP program

  1. Lockheed has had an in-house NHI craft recovery and storage team since the 1970s
  2. Lockheed amassed crashed and intact UAPs at a Palmdale, CA facility
  3. Lockheed successfully reverse-engineered an NHI craft in the mid-1980s and obfuscated this success from the US government
  4. Lockheed periodically relinquished some original NHI craft to USG as a deception (“whoops, we can’t figure it out, here have it back”)
  5. Schumer’s UAP bill targets Lockheed specifically; congress now wants the ARVs returned
  6. Lockheed used “psychics” or “telepath(s)” in their NHI work (heard second-hand “water-cooler” only — Michael L flags this as unverifiable rumor)
  7. USG was the original NHI recovery team; USG contracted Lockheed for reverse engineering; Lockheed then built its own internal recovery team using Lockheed-supplied air assets
  8. Members of an “unofficial casual task-force” across IC reached out to monasteries and Catholic priests because many IC professionals took a fundamentalist view of UAP as demonic

About the 2004 incident

  1. Date: 2004, location southwest US
  2. One of Lockheed’s own reverse-engineered ARVs crashed
  3. USG (thinking it was a genuine NHI craft) sent a JSOC recovery team
  4. The Lockheed recovery team was already on scene
  5. Violent altercation: “square off and full-on firefight along with an actual disarmed execution (murder) of one airman”
  6. JSOC initially thought the Lockheed team were terrorists; JSOC fired first; Lockheed fired back; Lockheed took a JSOC airman prisoner, taunted him, and executed him
  7. 2 deaths total — both JSOC airmen, both of Asian descent
  8. Lockheed escaped in their own dual-rotor helicopters; JSOC tracked the helicopters to a Lockheed facility, identifying the group
  9. “Blue on blue” — neither USG team had awareness of the other
  10. Michael L claims this is the incident David Grusch is referring to when he says “people have been killed to keep this UAP secret”
  11. The JSOC NHI-retrieval team is named: COBRA-SIMS-TEAM (SIMS = Special Intelligence Mission Section)

Disclosed contacts / network

  • Michael L states he has also been in contact with Ross Coulthart on the same subject matter
  • Michael L claims Coulthart confirmed awareness of the 2004 incident
  • A Coulthart email is referenced in the PDF (“screenshot below”) but is not visibly included in the available 25-page set
  • Jon Stewart attempts to forward to Dr. Michael Salla (Exopolitics) on Dec 12, 2023

Subsequent events (per iMessage screenshots, page 24-25)

  • Jon Stewart kept receiving more UAP emails after the initial exchange
  • Filed a police report with Deerfield Police Department (case #24-462, Officer Barry Schwartz, 850 Waukegan Road, Deerfield IL 60015)
  • Received a phone call from a “gentleman with an accent” warning Jon to “be very careful,” described as a “spooky character in a scene from a 60’s B Horror Movie”

What makes this notable

Pre-dates Barber by 13 months

The Michael L correspondence is dated December 4-5, 2023 — over a year before Jake Barber’s January 23, 2025 public surfacing on Coulthart’s NewsNation interview. Yet the substantive content overlaps remarkably:

ClaimMichael L (Dec 2023)Barber (Jan 2025)
ARV crash incident2004, southwest US”south of New Mexico possibly in Mexico,” date not explicit
Deaths2 (both Asian airmen, one executed)2 men killed
CounterpartyJSOC vs Lockheed in-house teamPrivate aerospace contractor team vs intercepting US military
Psychic/psionic component”psychics” / “telepath” rumored”psionic” component, summoning, consciousness
Palmdalenamed explicitlySkywatcher event in Palmdale, CA (per LegacyProgramVP critique)
Specific employerLockheed Martin”Grumman” per Sheehan slip
ChannelDirect email to Stewart, claims Coulthart contactCoulthart NewsNation interview

The employer specifically named in Michael L is Lockheed, but Sheehan later names Grumman as Barber’s employer (see redpandakoala-barber-northrop-grumman-20250221). The two narratives are not exactly the same, but they describe the same generic pattern: a private aerospace contractor running a parallel NHI recovery program, with a 2004 fatal contractor-vs-JSOC incident.

Independently corroborates the SOE fiction

The fictional “SOE_By_Alva_Douglas” PDF (see soe-by-alva-douglas-fiction) narrates the same 2004 Coyame Mexico ARV retrieval with similar specifics: JSOC special-mission unit, contractor team in dual-rotor helicopters with sling-loaded container, multiple casualties from a “black on black” friendly-fire situation, contractor escape to a subterranean base. This three-way pattern (Michael L emails, SOE fiction, Barber transcript) suggests a single internally-consistent narrative being seeded across multiple media channels with deliberately varying specifics (employer name, casualty count, location precision).

Stewart’s actual response is preserved

The thread preserves Jon Stewart’s authentic reaction chain:

  • “Mike. This is absolutely incredible!”
  • “Mike. Will you authorize me (without [name])”
  • “No Palmdale, whew, thank you for telling [me to redact that]”
  • “Understood. When are you free? Jon…”
  • “Hello?” (Dec 11, follow-up)
  • “Re Connecting” — “Michael, buddy, I am worried; are you all right?” (Dec 21)
  • Attempted forwarding to Salla / Exopolitics (Dec 12)

This is consistent with someone who received unsolicited claims, took them seriously, attempted to verify (LinkedIn search, contacting Exopolitics), and then went silent when the source disappeared.

The COBRA-SIMS-TEAM name

This is the most specific and falsifiable claim in the document. SIMS as “Special Intelligence Mission Section” is a plausible-sounding US military acronym, but no public reference to a JSOC “COBRA-SIMS” element is currently in the open record. If real, would be findable in FOIA-released documents or in DoD organizational charts. If fabricated, would be a clean disqualification of the document’s reliability.

The Deerfield police report (case 24-462) is concretely verifiable

A FOIA or public-records request to the Deerfield, IL Police Department for case #24-462 filed with Officer Barry Schwartz would confirm or deny that Jon Stewart filed a report. This is the most operationally verifiable element of the entire document.

Credibility framework position

Net credibility rating: ~25 (low). The substantive claims are entirely second-hand (“read into the program,” water-cooler-level), the sender’s identity and bio are unverifiable (the file’s own “what would change this” list is almost entirely unmet), and none of the checkable specifics (COBRA-SIMS-TEAM identifier, Deerfield PD case #24-462, the 2004 casualty records) have been confirmed. The two credibility-positive features — the pre-Barber timing (Dec 2023, over a year before the public version) and Stewart treating it seriously enough to apparently file a police report — keep it off the floor, but the document does not internally resolve between “real disclosure attempt,” “coordinated narrative-seeding,” and “sincere conspiracy-belief lone source.” An anonymous, uncorroborated, second-hand source rates low by construction. Below Barber (~30) and Brown (~33) because Michael L is not even a publicly named figure putting his reputation on the line — he is a screenshotted email handle.

The Michael L correspondence sits in an unusual credibility category: claims that are detailed and internally consistent, that pre-date the public version of the same claims by over a year, that go to a mainstream-comedian rather than to UAP-specialty media, and that the recipient (Stewart) appears to have treated as serious enough to file a police report about.

Three readings are possible:

  1. Real disclosure attempt. Michael L is who he says he is and the claims are substantively true. The pre-Barber timing supports this — disclosure-stage narratives wouldn’t typically pre-leak to a comedian by a year.

  2. Coordinated narrative-seeding operation. The Michael L message, the SOE fiction, and the Barber surfacing are stages of a single coordinated narrative being pushed across multiple channels for community-acceptance and media-uptake. The “Lockheed” naming in 2023 → “Grumman” naming in 2025 may be deliberate variability to seed multiple alternative-employer claims that can be denied selectively.

  3. Sincere conspiracy-belief lone-source contact. Michael L is a real person with a security clearance who genuinely believes water-cooler rumors he heard at Lockheed, packaged them sincerely, and reached out to a high-trust public figure. The narrative similarity to Barber’s later surfacing reflects that both draw from a shared body of UAP-community lore.

The document does not internally resolve between these three.

What would change this assessment

Toward higher credibility:

  • Verification of Michael L’s identity matching the claimed bio (Battelle Seattle employment, prior Lockheed security manager role, prior DIA + USMC intelligence career, Asian-American)
  • FOIA confirms Deerfield case #24-462 exists with Officer Barry Schwartz
  • The COBRA-SIMS-TEAM identifier appears in any verifiable JSOC or DoD document
  • The two “Asian airmen killed in 2004” specifics can be matched to actual military casualty records
  • Stewart confirms publicly that he authored and circulated the PDF

Toward lower credibility:

  • The COBRA-SIMS-TEAM identifier returns nothing across DoD, FOIA, or open-source records
  • The Battelle/Lockheed/DIA/USMC career path proves unverifiable
  • The Deerfield PD case does not exist
  • The PDF turns out to have been fabricated or modified before circulation (forensic image analysis of the screenshots would help)

What this means for the broader Barber narrative

Independently of Michael L’s actual identity, the document shifts the public-information state about the 2004 incident:

  • Specific identifying claims (Palmdale, COBRA-SIMS-TEAM, Asian airmen, Lockheed dual-rotor helicopters) are now public and falsifiable
  • The Coulthart connection is documented (Michael L claims Coulthart confirmed the 2004 incident in correspondence)
  • Stewart’s involvement is documented — a non-UAP figure who took the claims seriously enough to file a police report

The Barber-Coulthart axis (already documented in barber-noc-retrieval-claims) is now joined by a pre-existing Michael-L-Coulthart channel from 14 months earlier. Whether Barber’s later surfacing is independent of Michael L or downstream of the same network is the open question.

Cross-references

Graph View

Backlinks